Hi, The following seems like it is simple thing to address, but it doesn’t seem common. Here are my assumptions: 1) I have several computers configured in complicated ways that I’d like to keep under my physical control. 2) I have an ordinary residential type of internet connection with one public IP. 3) I use various other computers, and some of them have irritatingly restrictive network policies. I would like these computers to ask my computers to do things. But they won’t route traffic on unusual ports to the internet. So, for example, remapping ssh traffic to high ports and then using NAT to map them back on my end won’t work. They also will refuse to allow VPN traffic to be initiated from their end. I have looked at several VPN providers, but as far as I can tell all of them try as hard as possible to obfuscate the exit node. I don’t want to do that, I want to have public points of contact, esp. for
ssh that map directly back to me. I suppose I could go to Azure or AWS and make a node do whatever I wanted, but I was hoping there was a standard service for this. I don’t want to pay per-hour charges for compute that isn’t even compute.
Any ideas? Sorry for the pedestrian question. We all know how important it is to have the
best words. Marcus ============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove |
Markus, While not exactly virtualized IP, can you accomplish what you need via a dynamic DNS solution, ngrok.com or localtunnel.me and then manage routing on your internal network? On Wed, Aug 22, 2018, 7:45 AM Marcus Daniels <[hidden email]> wrote:
============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove |
In reply to this post by Marcus G. Daniels
I struggled for years with a proprietary product called Hamachi (http://vpn.net - a "zero config" "hole punching" VPN). It worked more or less well to connect computers behind restrictive firewalls, but the Linux version was in perpetual beta for years. Once the company and software were bought by Logmein, it seems to be pretty well abandoned. I found an actively developed, well supported open source alternative called Zero Tier (https://github.com/zerotier/ZeroTierOne). I don't know if it will suit you, but it works perfectly for my needs. On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 12:45 AM Marcus Daniels <[hidden email]> wrote:
============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove |
In reply to this post by Stephen Guerin-4
Thanks Stephen and Gary. Since what I’m doing at the moment is just with ssh, I can just use
ProxyJump. Good to know about the web-oriented ones too. ZeroTierOne will have to wait for a few more free cycles, but that does look ideal. Marcus From: Friam <[hidden email]> on behalf of Stephen Guerin <[hidden email]> Markus, While not exactly virtualized IP, can you accomplish what you need via a dynamic DNS solution,
ngrok.com or localtunnel.me and then manage routing on your internal network? On Wed, Aug 22, 2018, 7:45 AM Marcus Daniels <[hidden email]> wrote:
============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove |
In reply to this post by Stephen Guerin-4
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 11:44:14AM +0200, Stephen Guerin wrote:
> Markus, > > While not exactly virtualized IP, can you accomplish what you need via a > dynamic DNS solution, ngrok.com or localtunnel.me and then manage routing on > your internal network? dynamic DNS is not really important - ISTM that your solution is to move up the protocol stack. Markus's original problem was that the restrictive nature of his client network was such that he couldn't distinguish between requests at layer 3 (TCP). You're right that layering the requests on a layer 4 protocol like http allows you to distinguish requests by inserting the distinguishing label in a field in http request header - eg the Host field, which can contain a domain name and a port. ISTM, it is not necessary for the domain inserted into the Host field to be resolvable - if it is, then just distinguish on the port part - so dynamic DNS is not necessary. Cheers -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dr Russell Standish Phone 0425 253119 (mobile) Principal, High Performance Coders Visiting Senior Research Fellow [hidden email] Economics, Kingston University http://www.hpcoders.com.au ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |