The Lost Land

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
16 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

The Lost Land

Jochen Fromm-5
In the recent edition of National Geographic there
is an article about Native Americans named
"In the shadow of wounded knee"
http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2012/08/pine-ridge/fuller-text 

It contains a map ("the lost land") which shows
the shrinking land of the Indian reservation (esp. the
ones from the Sioux) during the 19th century. Once the
native Americans owned the whole country, from the
Apache in the south west to the Massachusett in the north
east. Then the British settlers and European colonists came,
and in the name of their god they occupied and invaded
the country. Now the Indians live in ever shrinking
reservations.
http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2012/08/pine-ridge/reservation-map

Somehow this reminded me of the shrinking land
of the Palestinian people. Palestinians are a bit
like the native Americans, they are the native
inhabitants of a countried occupied by foreign
settlers. Today they live in a small confined area.
http://sabbah.biz/mt/archives/2006/05/10/the-shrinking-map-of-palestine/

In both cases, the occupying force justify the
occupation with an higher entity which gave
them the right to live there. Expelled from
there original countries, the settlers (Puritans
in American, Jews in Palestine) came to stay.

In Australia, the native Australians ("Aborigines")
are confined in aboriginal reserves. Like the
native Americans, the indigenous Australians had
not developed a system of writing. Does this
lower cultural level justify an occupation?

-J.







============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: The Lost Land

Steve Smith
Jochen -

I appreciate this post.
> In the recent edition of National Geographic there
> is an article about Native Americans named
> "In the shadow of wounded knee"
> http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2012/08/pine-ridge/fuller-text
I am very sensitive to this issue because *I* literally own/live-on a
small piece of land that was expropriated from a Native tribe very
recently.    I also listen regularly to strong rhetoric against the
Israelis for their handling of the Palestinians while living amongst our
own Native Americans who have been treated (in past centuries) even more
brutally and in present times, perhaps less so, but still less than ideal.

Some on this list will perceive your post and my response perhaps as
"political"..  I try to remain relatively neutral in the politics, but I
believe this is a significant "humanitarian" issue.  And by humanitarian
I don't just mean the humanity of those being abused, I'm concerned for
the humanity of the abusers... roughly "us".   I am not religious so I
don't really think in terms of saved or lost "souls" but if I did, I'd
be much more worried about the souls of the occupiers than of the occupied.

And a simple answer to  simple question... NO, the cultural differences
(I'm reluctant to use the terms higher or lower) do not justify an
occupation.   And to this list we can add many more examples (e.g. South
Africa) and open questions such as the "Mongolian" occupation of much of
Eastern Europe and the middle east, or the Roman Occupation of north
africa, middle east, europe, or the Moorish occupation of Spain, or the
Native American (Asian?) occupation of North America (did they have a
big hand in the die-off of the megafauna of North America?).

My house is built on 1.5 acres among a section of 5.5 acres which Public
Service of NM took ownership for the purpose of building a natural gas
compression station.  I do not know their mechanism for this, it *may
have been* a trade, but it also may have been a simple request to the
State or Fed to "condemn" the parcel they wanted, literally taking it by
(legal) force from the San Ildefonso Pueblo, a very small "tribe" on a
very small "reservation", Perhaps a thousand  people on a few hundred
square miles.   Apparently PNM changed their minds and decided not to
complete the project but managed to hold on to the land and sell it to a
private (Anglo) individual who then subdivided and resold (to more
Anglos).   4 homes were built on these properties in the 1980's and in
2000 I bought mine from the original owner-builder.   Reviewing the
title search, I discovered the provenance.  It was a little
disturbing... the details I give here were not in the document, only the
record that PNM was the first "owner" after the pueblo itself.   The
rest I pieced together from other information.

So I am now, just like many of the Zionists in Israel, an occupier. I
feel somewhat innocent in my motivations, however i have to admit to
having coveted this location since before the homes were built 30 years
ago, knowing that it was "embedded" in the "reservation"... appreciating
it for it's location, including the proximity to this pueblo.
Romantically, I wanted to believe it was some small homestead from the
1800s which had been deeded to the family of the hispanic original
occupants when NM became a state in 1912.   Of course, the truth was not
nearly that romantic.

The Natives have a much less adversarial stance with the non-native here
than say in Palestine.  They were completely crushed into submission
centuries ago and have lived in relative peace with their "occupiers"
since then with only small abuses of the relationship such as the one
that lead to the expropriation of the piece of property that I live on.  
I have a number of Native friends from cultures distributed mostly
throughout the southwest of the US, and a few from farther north, but
really hardly any from the East.    I also work with the Institute of
American Indian Art in Santa Fe which puts me in contact with native
students and faculty from all over North America.  And I *should* put in
a plug for them... they accept students from anywhere, there is no
in/out state tuition... they are very affordable... many of their
students and studying there would be an amazing opportunity for anyone.  
www.iaia.org

New Mexico, as you may know, has the longest history of Native-European
interactions in the US.   The first incursion of the Spanish into what
is now the USA and the first permanent settlement happened about 30
miles from my house in the early 1500's well before the pilgrims or
Spanish settlements in Florida.  They were (as the Spanish did in those
times) looking for vast hoards of gold.  The Natives in the area
submitted somewhat willingly, being a relatively peace-loving people and
the Spanish were not brutal unless there was resistance to their
presence whereupon their horses and steel weapons and armor allowed them
to be crushingly brutal. Not long after their first settlement among the
Ohkay-Owinghe village, the Spanish Priests pulled rank on the Spanish
Noblemen and made them move the settlement to what is now Santa Fe...  
The priests, no matter what else you may think of them, apparently were
looking after the mortal as well as the immortal souls of the "children
of god" they had come here to "save"... they saw that the presence of
the Spaniards was causing the natives grave harm, even without overt
abuses... I'm sure there were individual abuses, but in general, it is
said that the Spanish "occupiers" were relatively not unkind in this
period, but the priests already recognized that their mere presence was
very disturbing to the natives well being.

As more Europeans arrived, things got worse of course and In the early
1600's the natives pulled together and managed a widespread rebellion
large enough to push the Spanish back south of what is modern day El
Paso, the entire occupied Rio Grande River Valley for nearly 400 miles
was expunged of these foreign devils.   A few years later, Juan de Onate
returned with a much more significant force and overwhelmed the natives
with their "modern weaponry", horses, and brutality.  A relatively small
but significant group held out against this force on top of a mesa
within view of my house... these native warriors were able to use thier
knowlege of the terrain and some help from their people now subjugated
in the region to remain at large for months.   Once they finally fell,
Onate and Spain "owned" the region again, and his first act to make the
point that rebellion would not be tolerated was to cut one foot off of
every able-bodied male of age to be a warrior as a preventative and a
reminder of his power (and intolerance).  It was nearly 300 years later
before the last of the Apache, a much more warlike nomadic people
closely related to the Navajo were finally subjugated in the region.  In
most if not all cases, subjugation of the native population in the
Americas was really near-extermination.  Both California and Texas, two
of our largest, richest States have almost NO indigenous people left...  
The bulk of the Native Americans *not* exterminated are in the
Southwest, concentrated in Arizona, New Mexico and Oklahoma.   This of
course, excludes the very large native Population in Alaska where their
remoteness protected them from abuse and exploitation somewhat until
modern technology and our thirst for oil caused us to overrun them as well.

I've lived among Natives all my life, meaning in regions where they
lived both on their own reservations and among the non-native
populations.   I've had several good friends who are native.   But I do
not pretend to understand the magnitude of what we did to them as a
population (even if I can pull the numbers and see the landscapes and
peoples).  One of my friends is Lakota Sioux and he grew up near Pine
Ridge and came of age (teenager) during the Wounded Knee debacle.   He
has spent his life becoming a very proud and capable artist and
craftsman but along the way he spent a great deal of it in the depths of
alcoholism and homelessness.  He has had a number of children, only a
few of whom he remains close to.   He is currently leading a large
effort/proposal among peers to win a grant to do an installation art
piece in South Dakota referencing not only the bad things that happened
to his people but also the good.  I have worked with him to develop a
digital maquette of an oversized pile of buffalo skulls to be
constructed next to I-70 in this area as well, a huge pyramid in
testimony to another travesty we perpetrated with our railroads and our
rifles.

But I do get queasy when our right-wing contingent supports Israel's
strong hawkish/occupational stances in Palestine and when some of our
left wing harsh attackers of Israel seem to forget our own (not that far
in the past) heritage as not just occupiers but exterminators,
perpetrators of genocide.   In many ways, our own brutality exceeded
anything that Israel has done by far.  This does not excuse the
Palestinian Occupation, but it should remind us that we have our own
wicked heritage which continues (as the stories in your links remind
us).   It is helpful to me in understanding the Israeli/Palestinian
problem to remind myself that I too am an occupier.  Anyone living in
the Americas are occupiers, etc.  My personal case is somewhat more
fresh, having been established as recently as the 1970's.

I'm not likely to deed over my "legal" property out of guilt, yet I
recognize that makes me little different than the Zionists who are
pushing back the borders of the Palestinians on a daily basis.   I came
to this location very respectful of the Natives, both intrinsically
because I've lived "among" them all my life, but also because I knew
that the land I was living on *was* expropriated from them at some point
in history.  While I like where I live very much, I would accept being
"relocated" to relieve my "occupation" of their territory...  I did
engage in the US real-estate market in good faith, and would expect
*someone* (US Govt, PNM?) to compensate me reasonably for this, but to
accept that my choice of "a good location" was misinformed and poorly
thought through and needed to be corrected.   If the bulk of my
financial security were not based in my home ownership, I might also
consider truly, simply returning the property to the tribe.  This of
course would be a drop in their bucket (1.5 acres out of a hundred
square miles) and a confrontation to my 3 neighbors who are in the same
circumstance, but perhaps spiritually a good gesture.

The region enjoys a colorful "tricultural" experience of Native,
Hispanic and Anglo and this is part of what I love about it, and perhaps
even the Natives themselves can appreciate (every pueblo has a catholic
church in it, most natives have hispanic surnames, and many enjoy the
lifestyles afforded by working the jobs provided by the "occupying
force").  But it is quite disorienting when a modern hispanic man (this
is a very coveted role in the region) rides his horse into the plaza in
Santa Fe each year during Fiesta decked in armor, sword in hand and the
entire population shouts "Onate!", celebrating his 'return' to Santa Fe.
   Nobody mentions the brutality of that moment, just the splendor.   A
friend of this list worked with Robert Mirabal (Taos Pueblo) last year
to help him produce an extremely moving production called "Poh Peh
Speaks", re-enacting the life and experience and perspective of the
Native Spirit starting with the experience of the Taos Pueblo Native who
instigated the uprising  nearly 400 years ago and leading up to the
present.  It is very moving.  He has even traveled to Spain this year to
present this performance.  I hope that he can continue to reach a wider
audience.

The problem of colonization and occupation is not an easy one.  It is
very hard to undo things that were done.   Things done centuries ago are
hard for one reason while things done today are hard for other reasons.

Good issue, IMO, but probably too rich for this lists blood.  We'll see.

- Steve

> It contains a map ("the lost land") which shows
> the shrinking land of the Indian reservation (esp. the ones from the
> Sioux) during the 19th century. Once the native Americans owned the
> whole country, from the Apache in the south west to the Massachusett
> in the north east. Then the British settlers and European colonists
> came, and in the name of their god they occupied and invaded the
> country. Now the Indians live in ever shrinking reservations.
> http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2012/08/pine-ridge/reservation-map
>
> Somehow this reminded me of the shrinking land
> of the Palestinian people. Palestinians are a bit
> like the native Americans, they are the native
> inhabitants of a countried occupied by foreign
> settlers. Today they live in a small confined area.
> http://sabbah.biz/mt/archives/2006/05/10/the-shrinking-map-of-palestine/
>
> In both cases, the occupying force justify the occupation with an
> higher entity which gave them the right to live there. Expelled from
> there original countries, the settlers (Puritans in American, Jews in
> Palestine) came to stay.
>
> In Australia, the native Australians ("Aborigines")
> are confined in aboriginal reserves. Like the
> native Americans, the indigenous Australians had not developed a
> system of writing. Does this
> lower cultural level justify an occupation?
>
> -J.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ============================================================
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
> lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org


============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: The Lost Land

Pamela McCorduck
Those of us who live in Santa Fe have what Steve has written thrust into our faces daily. He speaks of the indigenous people who have been colonized, with all the miseries that entails (and who had themselves, in some cases--e.g., the Diné--moved late into the land of others). He doesn't mention the Anglo takeover of Hispanic New Mexico, which is a sad tale in its own right. 

Steve is right; the subject is vexed. It gets even more vexed when the issues are about psychological colonization--of minorities, of ethnic groups, of women. I have no answers either. My privileged life is very different from the lives my forebears led as Irish immigrants in England, as colonized Irish in Ireland, as (it seems) conquerors of the Irish from Scotland. 

What is different is attitude: white Europeans believed in their divine right, even obligation, to do these things. The Israeli settlers in Palestine may also feel they have a divine right to their Biblical homeland, but few people in the world share this view any more.

Pamela



"Bounded Rationality,"  by Pamela McCorduck, the second novel in the series, Santa Fe Stories, Sunstone Press, is now available both as ink-on-paper and as an e-book.


“The person, be it gentleman or lady, who has not pleasure in a good novel, must be intolerably stupid.” 
― Jane Austen







============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: The Lost Land

Victoria Hughes
In reply to this post by Steve Smith
Great informative post, thanks, Steve. 

I suspect the link you mean is www.iaia.edu 
 although you are so eclectic, who knows.

Best-
Tory

On Aug 19, 2012, at 9:12 AM, Steve Smith wrote:

Jochen -

I appreciate this post.
In the recent edition of National Geographic there
is an article about Native Americans named
"In the shadow of wounded knee"
http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2012/08/pine-ridge/fuller-text
I am very sensitive to this issue because *I* literally own/live-on a small piece of land that was expropriated from a Native tribe very recently.    I also listen regularly to strong rhetoric against the Israelis for their handling of the Palestinians while living amongst our own Native Americans who have been treated (in past centuries) even more brutally and in present times, perhaps less so, but still less than ideal.

Some on this list will perceive your post and my response perhaps as "political"..  I try to remain relatively neutral in the politics, but I believe this is a significant "humanitarian" issue.  And by humanitarian I don't just mean the humanity of those being abused, I'm concerned for the humanity of the abusers... roughly "us".   I am not religious so I don't really think in terms of saved or lost "souls" but if I did, I'd be much more worried about the souls of the occupiers than of the occupied.

And a simple answer to  simple question... NO, the cultural differences (I'm reluctant to use the terms higher or lower) do not justify an occupation.   And to this list we can add many more examples (e.g. South Africa) and open questions such as the "Mongolian" occupation of much of Eastern Europe and the middle east, or the Roman Occupation of north africa, middle east, europe, or the Moorish occupation of Spain, or the Native American (Asian?) occupation of North America (did they have a big hand in the die-off of the megafauna of North America?).

My house is built on 1.5 acres among a section of 5.5 acres which Public Service of NM took ownership for the purpose of building a natural gas compression station.  I do not know their mechanism for this, it *may have been* a trade, but it also may have been a simple request to the State or Fed to "condemn" the parcel they wanted, literally taking it by (legal) force from the San Ildefonso Pueblo, a very small "tribe" on a very small "reservation", Perhaps a thousand  people on a few hundred square miles.   Apparently PNM changed their minds and decided not to complete the project but managed to hold on to the land and sell it to a private (Anglo) individual who then subdivided and resold (to more Anglos).   4 homes were built on these properties in the 1980's and in 2000 I bought mine from the original owner-builder.   Reviewing the title search, I discovered the provenance.  It was a little disturbing... the details I give here were not in the document, only the record that PNM was the first "owner" after the pueblo itself.   The rest I pieced together from other information.

So I am now, just like many of the Zionists in Israel, an occupier. I feel somewhat innocent in my motivations, however i have to admit to having coveted this location since before the homes were built 30 years ago, knowing that it was "embedded" in the "reservation"... appreciating it for it's location, including the proximity to this pueblo. Romantically, I wanted to believe it was some small homestead from the 1800s which had been deeded to the family of the hispanic original occupants when NM became a state in 1912.   Of course, the truth was not nearly that romantic.

The Natives have a much less adversarial stance with the non-native here than say in Palestine.  They were completely crushed into submission centuries ago and have lived in relative peace with their "occupiers" since then with only small abuses of the relationship such as the one that lead to the expropriation of the piece of property that I live on.  I have a number of Native friends from cultures distributed mostly throughout the southwest of the US, and a few from farther north, but really hardly any from the East.    I also work with the Institute of American Indian Art in Santa Fe which puts me in contact with native students and faculty from all over North America.  And I *should* put in a plug for them... they accept students from anywhere, there is no in/out state tuition... they are very affordable... many of their students and studying there would be an amazing opportunity for anyone.  www.iaia.org

New Mexico, as you may know, has the longest history of Native-European interactions in the US.   The first incursion of the Spanish into what is now the USA and the first permanent settlement happened about 30 miles from my house in the early 1500's well before the pilgrims or Spanish settlements in Florida.  They were (as the Spanish did in those times) looking for vast hoards of gold.  The Natives in the area submitted somewhat willingly, being a relatively peace-loving people and the Spanish were not brutal unless there was resistance to their presence whereupon their horses and steel weapons and armor allowed them to be crushingly brutal. Not long after their first settlement among the Ohkay-Owinghe village, the Spanish Priests pulled rank on the Spanish Noblemen and made them move the settlement to what is now Santa Fe...  The priests, no matter what else you may think of them, apparently were looking after the mortal as well as the immortal souls of the "children of god" they had come here to "save"... they saw that the presence of the Spaniards was causing the natives grave harm, even without overt abuses... I'm sure there were individual abuses, but in general, it is said that the Spanish "occupiers" were relatively not unkind in this period, but the priests already recognized that their mere presence was very disturbing to the natives well being.

As more Europeans arrived, things got worse of course and In the early 1600's the natives pulled together and managed a widespread rebellion large enough to push the Spanish back south of what is modern day El Paso, the entire occupied Rio Grande River Valley for nearly 400 miles was expunged of these foreign devils.   A few years later, Juan de Onate returned with a much more significant force and overwhelmed the natives with their "modern weaponry", horses, and brutality.  A relatively small but significant group held out against this force on top of a mesa within view of my house... these native warriors were able to use thier knowlege of the terrain and some help from their people now subjugated in the region to remain at large for months.   Once they finally fell, Onate and Spain "owned" the region again, and his first act to make the point that rebellion would not be tolerated was to cut one foot off of every able-bodied male of age to be a warrior as a preventative and a reminder of his power (and intolerance).  It was nearly 300 years later before the last of the Apache, a much more warlike nomadic people closely related to the Navajo were finally subjugated in the region.  In most if not all cases, subjugation of the native population in the Americas was really near-extermination.  Both California and Texas, two of our largest, richest States have almost NO indigenous people left...  The bulk of the Native Americans *not* exterminated are in the Southwest, concentrated in Arizona, New Mexico and Oklahoma.   This of course, excludes the very large native Population in Alaska where their remoteness protected them from abuse and exploitation somewhat until modern technology and our thirst for oil caused us to overrun them as well.

I've lived among Natives all my life, meaning in regions where they lived both on their own reservations and among the non-native populations.   I've had several good friends who are native.   But I do not pretend to understand the magnitude of what we did to them as a population (even if I can pull the numbers and see the landscapes and peoples).  One of my friends is Lakota Sioux and he grew up near Pine Ridge and came of age (teenager) during the Wounded Knee debacle.   He has spent his life becoming a very proud and capable artist and craftsman but along the way he spent a great deal of it in the depths of alcoholism and homelessness.  He has had a number of children, only a few of whom he remains close to.   He is currently leading a large effort/proposal among peers to win a grant to do an installation art piece in South Dakota referencing not only the bad things that happened to his people but also the good.  I have worked with him to develop a digital maquette of an oversized pile of buffalo skulls to be constructed next to I-70 in this area as well, a huge pyramid in testimony to another travesty we perpetrated with our railroads and our rifles.

But I do get queasy when our right-wing contingent supports Israel's strong hawkish/occupational stances in Palestine and when some of our left wing harsh attackers of Israel seem to forget our own (not that far in the past) heritage as not just occupiers but exterminators, perpetrators of genocide.   In many ways, our own brutality exceeded anything that Israel has done by far.  This does not excuse the Palestinian Occupation, but it should remind us that we have our own wicked heritage which continues (as the stories in your links remind us).   It is helpful to me in understanding the Israeli/Palestinian problem to remind myself that I too am an occupier.  Anyone living in the Americas are occupiers, etc.  My personal case is somewhat more fresh, having been established as recently as the 1970's.

I'm not likely to deed over my "legal" property out of guilt, yet I recognize that makes me little different than the Zionists who are pushing back the borders of the Palestinians on a daily basis.   I came to this location very respectful of the Natives, both intrinsically because I've lived "among" them all my life, but also because I knew that the land I was living on *was* expropriated from them at some point in history.  While I like where I live very much, I would accept being "relocated" to relieve my "occupation" of their territory...  I did engage in the US real-estate market in good faith, and would expect *someone* (US Govt, PNM?) to compensate me reasonably for this, but to accept that my choice of "a good location" was misinformed and poorly thought through and needed to be corrected.   If the bulk of my financial security were not based in my home ownership, I might also consider truly, simply returning the property to the tribe.  This of course would be a drop in their bucket (1.5 acres out of a hundred square miles) and a confrontation to my 3 neighbors who are in the same circumstance, but perhaps spiritually a good gesture.

The region enjoys a colorful "tricultural" experience of Native, Hispanic and Anglo and this is part of what I love about it, and perhaps even the Natives themselves can appreciate (every pueblo has a catholic church in it, most natives have hispanic surnames, and many enjoy the lifestyles afforded by working the jobs provided by the "occupying force").  But it is quite disorienting when a modern hispanic man (this is a very coveted role in the region) rides his horse into the plaza in Santa Fe each year during Fiesta decked in armor, sword in hand and the entire population shouts "Onate!", celebrating his 'return' to Santa Fe.   Nobody mentions the brutality of that moment, just the splendor.   A friend of this list worked with Robert Mirabal (Taos Pueblo) last year to help him produce an extremely moving production called "Poh Peh Speaks", re-enacting the life and experience and perspective of the Native Spirit starting with the experience of the Taos Pueblo Native who instigated the uprising  nearly 400 years ago and leading up to the present.  It is very moving.  He has even traveled to Spain this year to present this performance.  I hope that he can continue to reach a wider audience.

The problem of colonization and occupation is not an easy one.  It is very hard to undo things that were done.   Things done centuries ago are hard for one reason while things done today are hard for other reasons.

Good issue, IMO, but probably too rich for this lists blood.  We'll see.

- Steve
It contains a map ("the lost land") which shows
the shrinking land of the Indian reservation (esp. the ones from the Sioux) during the 19th century. Once the native Americans owned the whole country, from the Apache in the south west to the Massachusett in the north east. Then the British settlers and European colonists came, and in the name of their god they occupied and invaded the country. Now the Indians live in ever shrinking reservations.
http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2012/08/pine-ridge/reservation-map

Somehow this reminded me of the shrinking land
of the Palestinian people. Palestinians are a bit
like the native Americans, they are the native
inhabitants of a countried occupied by foreign
settlers. Today they live in a small confined area.
http://sabbah.biz/mt/archives/2006/05/10/the-shrinking-map-of-palestine/

In both cases, the occupying force justify the occupation with an higher entity which gave them the right to live there. Expelled from there original countries, the settlers (Puritans in American, Jews in Palestine) came to stay.

In Australia, the native Australians ("Aborigines")
are confined in aboriginal reserves. Like the
native Americans, the indigenous Australians had not developed a system of writing. Does this
lower cultural level justify an occupation?

-J.







============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org


============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org






============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: The Lost Land

Steve Smith
Yes Tory, thanks for the correction to iaia.edu !

And thanks also to Pamela for noting my omission of the Anglo takeover of Hispanic (but no longer Spanish, after the original colonists from Spain, now mixed with the indigenous population, asserted their own independence to form Mexico).   The Anglo takeover started with the establishment/expansion of the republic of Texas and then was completed when Texas joined the Union and the railroad came roaring into town.  And yes, every colonization, every expansion (as noted with the Dine...  Navajo/Apache who had "colonized" a large region near this area not long before the arrival of the Spanish) includes harm to those already there.  Ghengis Khan's depradations being perhaps the most extravagant or most noted example excepting that I'm not sure he and his were claiming to bring either civilization nor salvation, but perhaps they had that idea too?

I am not sure that "few people share this view anymore" regarding divine rights or maybe more to the point, "manifest destiny" or "might makes right".   I agree that in spirit most of us are on that page together, but in practice we may not be.

 We continue to this day colonizing through popular culture and multinational extractive interests in the third world, and each of us when we ask for more copper wiring for our houses, more teak furniture for our condos, more rare earth magnets for our wind turbines and electric vehicle motors are participating... or so my bleeding heart believes.   I intended not to get political and I think I'm still on the good side of that, but I know this is very near (or over) a line that many accept as an obvious and given humanitarian position.  Many do believe that *we* have some right to the resources of the world independent of the impact on those already living where those resources are.  It is an old plan we have lived on for millenia... and I don't have answers either (I liked Pamela's use of the word "vexed").

- Steve


Great informative post, thanks, Steve. 

I suspect the link you mean is www.iaia.edu 
 although you are so eclectic, who knows.

Best-
Tory

On Aug 19, 2012, at 9:12 AM, Steve Smith wrote:

Jochen -

I appreciate this post.
In the recent edition of National Geographic there
is an article about Native Americans named
"In the shadow of wounded knee"
http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2012/08/pine-ridge/fuller-text
I am very sensitive to this issue because *I* literally own/live-on a small piece of land that was expropriated from a Native tribe very recently.    I also listen regularly to strong rhetoric against the Israelis for their handling of the Palestinians while living amongst our own Native Americans who have been treated (in past centuries) even more brutally and in present times, perhaps less so, but still less than ideal.

Some on this list will perceive your post and my response perhaps as "political"..  I try to remain relatively neutral in the politics, but I believe this is a significant "humanitarian" issue.  And by humanitarian I don't just mean the humanity of those being abused, I'm concerned for the humanity of the abusers... roughly "us".   I am not religious so I don't really think in terms of saved or lost "souls" but if I did, I'd be much more worried about the souls of the occupiers than of the occupied.

And a simple answer to  simple question... NO, the cultural differences (I'm reluctant to use the terms higher or lower) do not justify an occupation.   And to this list we can add many more examples (e.g. South Africa) and open questions such as the "Mongolian" occupation of much of Eastern Europe and the middle east, or the Roman Occupation of north africa, middle east, europe, or the Moorish occupation of Spain, or the Native American (Asian?) occupation of North America (did they have a big hand in the die-off of the megafauna of North America?).

My house is built on 1.5 acres among a section of 5.5 acres which Public Service of NM took ownership for the purpose of building a natural gas compression station.  I do not know their mechanism for this, it *may have been* a trade, but it also may have been a simple request to the State or Fed to "condemn" the parcel they wanted, literally taking it by (legal) force from the San Ildefonso Pueblo, a very small "tribe" on a very small "reservation", Perhaps a thousand  people on a few hundred square miles.   Apparently PNM changed their minds and decided not to complete the project but managed to hold on to the land and sell it to a private (Anglo) individual who then subdivided and resold (to more Anglos).   4 homes were built on these properties in the 1980's and in 2000 I bought mine from the original owner-builder.   Reviewing the title search, I discovered the provenance.  It was a little disturbing... the details I give here were not in the document, only the record that PNM was the first "owner" after the pueblo itself.   The rest I pieced together from other information.

So I am now, just like many of the Zionists in Israel, an occupier. I feel somewhat innocent in my motivations, however i have to admit to having coveted this location since before the homes were built 30 years ago, knowing that it was "embedded" in the "reservation"... appreciating it for it's location, including the proximity to this pueblo. Romantically, I wanted to believe it was some small homestead from the 1800s which had been deeded to the family of the hispanic original occupants when NM became a state in 1912.   Of course, the truth was not nearly that romantic.

The Natives have a much less adversarial stance with the non-native here than say in Palestine.  They were completely crushed into submission centuries ago and have lived in relative peace with their "occupiers" since then with only small abuses of the relationship such as the one that lead to the expropriation of the piece of property that I live on.  I have a number of Native friends from cultures distributed mostly throughout the southwest of the US, and a few from farther north, but really hardly any from the East.    I also work with the Institute of American Indian Art in Santa Fe which puts me in contact with native students and faculty from all over North America.  And I *should* put in a plug for them... they accept students from anywhere, there is no in/out state tuition... they are very affordable... many of their students and studying there would be an amazing opportunity for anyone.  www.iaia.org

New Mexico, as you may know, has the longest history of Native-European interactions in the US.   The first incursion of the Spanish into what is now the USA and the first permanent settlement happened about 30 miles from my house in the early 1500's well before the pilgrims or Spanish settlements in Florida.  They were (as the Spanish did in those times) looking for vast hoards of gold.  The Natives in the area submitted somewhat willingly, being a relatively peace-loving people and the Spanish were not brutal unless there was resistance to their presence whereupon their horses and steel weapons and armor allowed them to be crushingly brutal. Not long after their first settlement among the Ohkay-Owinghe village, the Spanish Priests pulled rank on the Spanish Noblemen and made them move the settlement to what is now Santa Fe...  The priests, no matter what else you may think of them, apparently were looking after the mortal as well as the immortal souls of the "children of god" they had come here to "save"... they saw that the presence of the Spaniards was causing the natives grave harm, even without overt abuses... I'm sure there were individual abuses, but in general, it is said that the Spanish "occupiers" were relatively not unkind in this period, but the priests already recognized that their mere presence was very disturbing to the natives well being.

As more Europeans arrived, things got worse of course and In the early 1600's the natives pulled together and managed a widespread rebellion large enough to push the Spanish back south of what is modern day El Paso, the entire occupied Rio Grande River Valley for nearly 400 miles was expunged of these foreign devils.   A few years later, Juan de Onate returned with a much more significant force and overwhelmed the natives with their "modern weaponry", horses, and brutality.  A relatively small but significant group held out against this force on top of a mesa within view of my house... these native warriors were able to use thier knowlege of the terrain and some help from their people now subjugated in the region to remain at large for months.   Once they finally fell, Onate and Spain "owned" the region again, and his first act to make the point that rebellion would not be tolerated was to cut one foot off of every able-bodied male of age to be a warrior as a preventative and a reminder of his power (and intolerance).  It was nearly 300 years later before the last of the Apache, a much more warlike nomadic people closely related to the Navajo were finally subjugated in the region.  In most if not all cases, subjugation of the native population in the Americas was really near-extermination.  Both California and Texas, two of our largest, richest States have almost NO indigenous people left...  The bulk of the Native Americans *not* exterminated are in the Southwest, concentrated in Arizona, New Mexico and Oklahoma.   This of course, excludes the very large native Population in Alaska where their remoteness protected them from abuse and exploitation somewhat until modern technology and our thirst for oil caused us to overrun them as well.

I've lived among Natives all my life, meaning in regions where they lived both on their own reservations and among the non-native populations.   I've had several good friends who are native.   But I do not pretend to understand the magnitude of what we did to them as a population (even if I can pull the numbers and see the landscapes and peoples).  One of my friends is Lakota Sioux and he grew up near Pine Ridge and came of age (teenager) during the Wounded Knee debacle.   He has spent his life becoming a very proud and capable artist and craftsman but along the way he spent a great deal of it in the depths of alcoholism and homelessness.  He has had a number of children, only a few of whom he remains close to.   He is currently leading a large effort/proposal among peers to win a grant to do an installation art piece in South Dakota referencing not only the bad things that happened to his people but also the good.  I have worked with him to develop a digital maquette of an oversized pile of buffalo skulls to be constructed next to I-70 in this area as well, a huge pyramid in testimony to another travesty we perpetrated with our railroads and our rifles.

But I do get queasy when our right-wing contingent supports Israel's strong hawkish/occupational stances in Palestine and when some of our left wing harsh attackers of Israel seem to forget our own (not that far in the past) heritage as not just occupiers but exterminators, perpetrators of genocide.   In many ways, our own brutality exceeded anything that Israel has done by far.  This does not excuse the Palestinian Occupation, but it should remind us that we have our own wicked heritage which continues (as the stories in your links remind us).   It is helpful to me in understanding the Israeli/Palestinian problem to remind myself that I too am an occupier.  Anyone living in the Americas are occupiers, etc.  My personal case is somewhat more fresh, having been established as recently as the 1970's.

I'm not likely to deed over my "legal" property out of guilt, yet I recognize that makes me little different than the Zionists who are pushing back the borders of the Palestinians on a daily basis.   I came to this location very respectful of the Natives, both intrinsically because I've lived "among" them all my life, but also because I knew that the land I was living on *was* expropriated from them at some point in history.  While I like where I live very much, I would accept being "relocated" to relieve my "occupation" of their territory...  I did engage in the US real-estate market in good faith, and would expect *someone* (US Govt, PNM?) to compensate me reasonably for this, but to accept that my choice of "a good location" was misinformed and poorly thought through and needed to be corrected.   If the bulk of my financial security were not based in my home ownership, I might also consider truly, simply returning the property to the tribe.  This of course would be a drop in their bucket (1.5 acres out of a hundred square miles) and a confrontation to my 3 neighbors who are in the same circumstance, but perhaps spiritually a good gesture.

The region enjoys a colorful "tricultural" experience of Native, Hispanic and Anglo and this is part of what I love about it, and perhaps even the Natives themselves can appreciate (every pueblo has a catholic church in it, most natives have hispanic surnames, and many enjoy the lifestyles afforded by working the jobs provided by the "occupying force").  But it is quite disorienting when a modern hispanic man (this is a very coveted role in the region) rides his horse into the plaza in Santa Fe each year during Fiesta decked in armor, sword in hand and the entire population shouts "Onate!", celebrating his 'return' to Santa Fe.   Nobody mentions the brutality of that moment, just the splendor.   A friend of this list worked with Robert Mirabal (Taos Pueblo) last year to help him produce an extremely moving production called "Poh Peh Speaks", re-enacting the life and experience and perspective of the Native Spirit starting with the experience of the Taos Pueblo Native who instigated the uprising  nearly 400 years ago and leading up to the present.  It is very moving.  He has even traveled to Spain this year to present this performance.  I hope that he can continue to reach a wider audience.

The problem of colonization and occupation is not an easy one.  It is very hard to undo things that were done.   Things done centuries ago are hard for one reason while things done today are hard for other reasons.

Good issue, IMO, but probably too rich for this lists blood.  We'll see.

- Steve
It contains a map ("the lost land") which shows
the shrinking land of the Indian reservation (esp. the ones from the Sioux) during the 19th century. Once the native Americans owned the whole country, from the Apache in the south west to the Massachusett in the north east. Then the British settlers and European colonists came, and in the name of their god they occupied and invaded the country. Now the Indians live in ever shrinking reservations.
http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2012/08/pine-ridge/reservation-map

Somehow this reminded me of the shrinking land
of the Palestinian people. Palestinians are a bit
like the native Americans, they are the native
inhabitants of a countried occupied by foreign
settlers. Today they live in a small confined area.
http://sabbah.biz/mt/archives/2006/05/10/the-shrinking-map-of-palestine/

In both cases, the occupying force justify the occupation with an higher entity which gave them the right to live there. Expelled from there original countries, the settlers (Puritans in American, Jews in Palestine) came to stay.

In Australia, the native Australians ("Aborigines")
are confined in aboriginal reserves. Like the
native Americans, the indigenous Australians had not developed a system of writing. Does this
lower cultural level justify an occupation?

-J.







============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org


============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org




Tory Hughes
unusual objects and unique adornments 








============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org


============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: The Lost Land

Sarbajit Roy (testing)
shameless plug for this book
http://transbooks.com/cata/lus02.html
for Lost Lands a little further south.

On 8/19/12, Steve Smith <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Yes Tory, thanks for the correction to iaia.edu !
>
> And thanks also to Pamela for noting my omission of the Anglo takeover
> of Hispanic (but no longer Spanish, after the original colonists from
> Spain, now mixed with the indigenous population, asserted their own
> independence to form Mexico).   The Anglo takeover started with the
> establishment/expansion of the republic of Texas and then was completed
> when Texas joined the Union and the railroad came roaring into town.
> And yes, every colonization, every expansion (as noted with the Dine...
> Navajo/Apache who had "colonized" a large region near this area not long
> before the arrival of the Spanish) includes harm to those already there.
> Ghengis Khan's depradations being perhaps the most extravagant or most
> noted example excepting that I'm not sure he and his were claiming to
> bring either civilization nor salvation, but perhaps they had that idea
> too?
>
> I am not sure that "few people share this view anymore" regarding divine
> rights or maybe more to the point, "manifest destiny" or "might makes
> right".   I agree that in spirit most of us are on that page together,
> but in practice we may not be.
>
>   We continue to this day colonizing through popular culture and
> multinational extractive interests in the third world, and each of us
> when we ask for more copper wiring for our houses, more teak furniture
> for our condos, more rare earth magnets for our wind turbines and
> electric vehicle motors are participating... or so my bleeding heart
> believes.   I intended not to get political and I think I'm still on the
> good side of that, but I know this is very near (or over) a line that
> many accept as an obvious and given humanitarian position.  Many do
> believe that *we* have some right to the resources of the world
> independent of the impact on those already living where those resources
> are.  It is an old plan we have lived on for millenia... and I don't
> have answers either (I liked Pamela's use of the word "vexed").
>
> - Steve
>
>
>> Great informative post, thanks, Steve.
>>
>> I suspect the link you mean is www.iaia.edu <http://www.iaia.edu>
>>  although you are so eclectic, who knows.
>>
>> Best-
>> Tory
>>
>> On Aug 19, 2012, at 9:12 AM, Steve Smith wrote:
>>
>>> Jochen -
>>>
>>> I appreciate this post.
>>>> In the recent edition of National Geographic there
>>>> is an article about Native Americans named
>>>> "In the shadow of wounded knee"
>>>> http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2012/08/pine-ridge/fuller-text
>>> I am very sensitive to this issue because *I* literally own/live-on a
>>> small piece of land that was expropriated from a Native tribe very
>>> recently.    I also listen regularly to strong rhetoric against the
>>> Israelis for their handling of the Palestinians while living amongst
>>> our own Native Americans who have been treated (in past centuries)
>>> even more brutally and in present times, perhaps less so, but still
>>> less than ideal.
>>>
>>> Some on this list will perceive your post and my response perhaps as
>>> "political"..  I try to remain relatively neutral in the politics,
>>> but I believe this is a significant "humanitarian" issue.  And by
>>> humanitarian I don't just mean the humanity of those being abused,
>>> I'm concerned for the humanity of the abusers... roughly "us".   I am
>>> not religious so I don't really think in terms of saved or lost
>>> "souls" but if I did, I'd be much more worried about the souls of the
>>> occupiers than of the occupied.
>>>
>>> And a simple answer to  simple question... NO, the cultural
>>> differences (I'm reluctant to use the terms higher or lower) do not
>>> justify an occupation.   And to this list we can add many more
>>> examples (e.g. South Africa) and open questions such as the
>>> "Mongolian" occupation of much of Eastern Europe and the middle east,
>>> or the Roman Occupation of north africa, middle east, europe, or the
>>> Moorish occupation of Spain, or the Native American (Asian?)
>>> occupation of North America (did they have a big hand in the die-off
>>> of the megafauna of North America?).
>>>
>>> My house is built on 1.5 acres among a section of 5.5 acres which
>>> Public Service of NM took ownership for the purpose of building a
>>> natural gas compression station.  I do not know their mechanism for
>>> this, it *may have been* a trade, but it also may have been a simple
>>> request to the State or Fed to "condemn" the parcel they wanted,
>>> literally taking it by (legal) force from the San Ildefonso Pueblo, a
>>> very small "tribe" on a very small "reservation", Perhaps a thousand
>>>  people on a few hundred square miles.   Apparently PNM changed their
>>> minds and decided not to complete the project but managed to hold on
>>> to the land and sell it to a private (Anglo) individual who then
>>> subdivided and resold (to more Anglos).   4 homes were built on these
>>> properties in the 1980's and in 2000 I bought mine from the original
>>> owner-builder.   Reviewing the title search, I discovered the
>>> provenance.  It was a little disturbing... the details I give here
>>> were not in the document, only the record that PNM was the first
>>> "owner" after the pueblo itself.   The rest I pieced together from
>>> other information.
>>>
>>> So I am now, just like many of the Zionists in Israel, an occupier. I
>>> feel somewhat innocent in my motivations, however i have to admit to
>>> having coveted this location since before the homes were built 30
>>> years ago, knowing that it was "embedded" in the "reservation"...
>>> appreciating it for it's location, including the proximity to this
>>> pueblo. Romantically, I wanted to believe it was some small homestead
>>> from the 1800s which had been deeded to the family of the hispanic
>>> original occupants when NM became a state in 1912.   Of course, the
>>> truth was not nearly that romantic.
>>>
>>> The Natives have a much less adversarial stance with the non-native
>>> here than say in Palestine.  They were completely crushed into
>>> submission centuries ago and have lived in relative peace with their
>>> "occupiers" since then with only small abuses of the relationship
>>> such as the one that lead to the expropriation of the piece of
>>> property that I live on.  I have a number of Native friends from
>>> cultures distributed mostly throughout the southwest of the US, and a
>>> few from farther north, but really hardly any from the East.    I
>>> also work with the Institute of American Indian Art in Santa Fe which
>>> puts me in contact with native students and faculty from all over
>>> North America.  And I *should* put in a plug for them... they accept
>>> students from anywhere, there is no in/out state tuition... they are
>>> very affordable... many of their students and studying there would be
>>> an amazing opportunity for anyone. www.iaia.org <http://www.iaia.org>
>>>
>>> New Mexico, as you may know, has the longest history of
>>> Native-European interactions in the US.   The first incursion of the
>>> Spanish into what is now the USA and the first permanent settlement
>>> happened about 30 miles from my house in the early 1500's well before
>>> the pilgrims or Spanish settlements in Florida.  They were (as the
>>> Spanish did in those times) looking for vast hoards of gold.  The
>>> Natives in the area submitted somewhat willingly, being a relatively
>>> peace-loving people and the Spanish were not brutal unless there was
>>> resistance to their presence whereupon their horses and steel weapons
>>> and armor allowed them to be crushingly brutal. Not long after their
>>> first settlement among the Ohkay-Owinghe village, the Spanish Priests
>>> pulled rank on the Spanish Noblemen and made them move the settlement
>>> to what is now Santa Fe...  The priests, no matter what else you may
>>> think of them, apparently were looking after the mortal as well as
>>> the immortal souls of the "children of god" they had come here to
>>> "save"... they saw that the presence of the Spaniards was causing the
>>> natives grave harm, even without overt abuses... I'm sure there were
>>> individual abuses, but in general, it is said that the Spanish
>>> "occupiers" were relatively not unkind in this period, but the
>>> priests already recognized that their mere presence was very
>>> disturbing to the natives well being.
>>>
>>> As more Europeans arrived, things got worse of course and In the
>>> early 1600's the natives pulled together and managed a widespread
>>> rebellion large enough to push the Spanish back south of what is
>>> modern day El Paso, the entire occupied Rio Grande River Valley for
>>> nearly 400 miles was expunged of these foreign devils.   A few years
>>> later, Juan de Onate returned with a much more significant force and
>>> overwhelmed the natives with their "modern weaponry", horses, and
>>> brutality.  A relatively small but significant group held out against
>>> this force on top of a mesa within view of my house... these native
>>> warriors were able to use thier knowlege of the terrain and some help
>>> from their people now subjugated in the region to remain at large for
>>> months.   Once they finally fell, Onate and Spain "owned" the region
>>> again, and his first act to make the point that rebellion would not
>>> be tolerated was to cut one foot off of every able-bodied male of age
>>> to be a warrior as a preventative and a reminder of his power (and
>>> intolerance).  It was nearly 300 years later before the last of the
>>> Apache, a much more warlike nomadic people closely related to the
>>> Navajo were finally subjugated in the region.  In most if not all
>>> cases, subjugation of the native population in the Americas was
>>> really near-extermination.  Both California and Texas, two of our
>>> largest, richest States have almost NO indigenous people left...  The
>>> bulk of the Native Americans *not* exterminated are in the Southwest,
>>> concentrated in Arizona, New Mexico and Oklahoma.   This of course,
>>> excludes the very large native Population in Alaska where their
>>> remoteness protected them from abuse and exploitation somewhat until
>>> modern technology and our thirst for oil caused us to overrun them as
>>> well.
>>>
>>> I've lived among Natives all my life, meaning in regions where they
>>> lived both on their own reservations and among the non-native
>>> populations.   I've had several good friends who are native.   But I
>>> do not pretend to understand the magnitude of what we did to them as
>>> a population (even if I can pull the numbers and see the landscapes
>>> and peoples).  One of my friends is Lakota Sioux and he grew up near
>>> Pine Ridge and came of age (teenager) during the Wounded Knee
>>> debacle.   He has spent his life becoming a very proud and capable
>>> artist and craftsman but along the way he spent a great deal of it in
>>> the depths of alcoholism and homelessness.  He has had a number of
>>> children, only a few of whom he remains close to.   He is currently
>>> leading a large effort/proposal among peers to win a grant to do an
>>> installation art piece in South Dakota referencing not only the bad
>>> things that happened to his people but also the good.  I have worked
>>> with him to develop a digital maquette of an oversized pile of
>>> buffalo skulls to be constructed next to I-70 in this area as well, a
>>> huge pyramid in testimony to another travesty we perpetrated with our
>>> railroads and our rifles.
>>>
>>> But I do get queasy when our right-wing contingent supports Israel's
>>> strong hawkish/occupational stances in Palestine and when some of our
>>> left wing harsh attackers of Israel seem to forget our own (not that
>>> far in the past) heritage as not just occupiers but exterminators,
>>> perpetrators of genocide.   In many ways, our own brutality exceeded
>>> anything that Israel has done by far.  This does not excuse the
>>> Palestinian Occupation, but it should remind us that we have our own
>>> wicked heritage which continues (as the stories in your links remind
>>> us).   It is helpful to me in understanding the Israeli/Palestinian
>>> problem to remind myself that I too am an occupier.  Anyone living in
>>> the Americas are occupiers, etc.  My personal case is somewhat more
>>> fresh, having been established as recently as the 1970's.
>>>
>>> I'm not likely to deed over my "legal" property out of guilt, yet I
>>> recognize that makes me little different than the Zionists who are
>>> pushing back the borders of the Palestinians on a daily basis.   I
>>> came to this location very respectful of the Natives, both
>>> intrinsically because I've lived "among" them all my life, but also
>>> because I knew that the land I was living on *was* expropriated from
>>> them at some point in history.  While I like where I live very much,
>>> I would accept being "relocated" to relieve my "occupation" of their
>>> territory...  I did engage in the US real-estate market in good
>>> faith, and would expect *someone* (US Govt, PNM?) to compensate me
>>> reasonably for this, but to accept that my choice of "a good
>>> location" was misinformed and poorly thought through and needed to be
>>> corrected.   If the bulk of my financial security were not based in
>>> my home ownership, I might also consider truly, simply returning the
>>> property to the tribe.  This of course would be a drop in their
>>> bucket (1.5 acres out of a hundred square miles) and a confrontation
>>> to my 3 neighbors who are in the same circumstance, but perhaps
>>> spiritually a good gesture.
>>>
>>> The region enjoys a colorful "tricultural" experience of Native,
>>> Hispanic and Anglo and this is part of what I love about it, and
>>> perhaps even the Natives themselves can appreciate (every pueblo has
>>> a catholic church in it, most natives have hispanic surnames, and
>>> many enjoy the lifestyles afforded by working the jobs provided by
>>> the "occupying force").  But it is quite disorienting when a modern
>>> hispanic man (this is a very coveted role in the region) rides his
>>> horse into the plaza in Santa Fe each year during Fiesta decked in
>>> armor, sword in hand and the entire population shouts "Onate!",
>>> celebrating his 'return' to Santa Fe.   Nobody mentions the brutality
>>> of that moment, just the splendor.   A friend of this list worked
>>> with Robert Mirabal (Taos Pueblo) last year to help him produce an
>>> extremely moving production called "Poh Peh Speaks", re-enacting the
>>> life and experience and perspective of the Native Spirit starting
>>> with the experience of the Taos Pueblo Native who instigated the
>>> uprising  nearly 400 years ago and leading up to the present.  It is
>>> very moving.  He has even traveled to Spain this year to present this
>>> performance.  I hope that he can continue to reach a wider audience.
>>>
>>> The problem of colonization and occupation is not an easy one.  It is
>>> very hard to undo things that were done.   Things done centuries ago
>>> are hard for one reason while things done today are hard for other
>>> reasons.
>>>
>>> Good issue, IMO, but probably too rich for this lists blood.  We'll see.
>>>
>>> - Steve
>>>> It contains a map ("the lost land") which shows
>>>> the shrinking land of the Indian reservation (esp. the ones from the
>>>> Sioux) during the 19th century. Once the native Americans owned the
>>>> whole country, from the Apache in the south west to the Massachusett
>>>> in the north east. Then the British settlers and European colonists
>>>> came, and in the name of their god they occupied and invaded the
>>>> country. Now the Indians live in ever shrinking reservations.
>>>> http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2012/08/pine-ridge/reservation-map
>>>>
>>>> Somehow this reminded me of the shrinking land
>>>> of the Palestinian people. Palestinians are a bit
>>>> like the native Americans, they are the native
>>>> inhabitants of a countried occupied by foreign
>>>> settlers. Today they live in a small confined area.
>>>> http://sabbah.biz/mt/archives/2006/05/10/the-shrinking-map-of-palestine/
>>>>
>>>> In both cases, the occupying force justify the occupation with an
>>>> higher entity which gave them the right to live there. Expelled from
>>>> there original countries, the settlers (Puritans in American, Jews
>>>> in Palestine) came to stay.
>>>>
>>>> In Australia, the native Australians ("Aborigines")
>>>> are confined in aboriginal reserves. Like the
>>>> native Americans, the indigenous Australians had not developed a
>>>> system of writing. Does this
>>>> lower cultural level justify an occupation?
>>>>
>>>> -J.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ============================================================
>>>> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
>>>> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
>>>> lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
>>>
>>>
>>> ============================================================
>>> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
>>> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
>>> lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Tory Hughes
>> unusual objects and unique adornments
>> www.toryhughes.com <http://www.toryhughes.com>
>> www.toryhughes-galleryshop.com <http://www.toryhughes-galleryshop.com>
>> www.facebook.com/tory.hughes1 <http://www.facebook.com/tory.hughes1>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ============================================================
>> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
>> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
>> lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
>
>

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: The Lost Land

Bruce Sherwood
In reply to this post by Steve Smith
Steve, you're mixing two different periods in your statement, "As more
Europeans arrived, things got worse of course and In the early 1600's
the natives pulled together and managed a widespread rebellion large
enough to push the Spanish back south of what is modern day El Paso,
the entire occupied Rio Grande River Valley for nearly 400 miles was
expunged of these foreign devils. A few years later, Juan de Oñate
returned with a much more significant force and overwhelmed the
natives with their "modern weaponry", horses, and brutality.  A
relatively small but significant group held out against this force on
top of a mesa within view of my house... these native warriors were
able to use their knowledge of the terrain and some help from their
people now subjugated in the region to remain at large for months.
Once they finally fell, Onate and Spain "owned" the region again, and
his first act to make the point that rebellion would not be tolerated
was to cut one foot off of every able-bodied male of age to be a
warrior as a preventative and a reminder of his power (and
intolerance)."

The Pueblo Revolt was in the late 1600’s, 1680 to be exact, and the
reconquest in 1692 was led by De Vargas, not  Oñate. The reconquest is
nowadays characterized as “peaceful”, which is basically not true, as
can be seen at http://www.newmexicohistory.org/filedetails.php?fileID=482.

Juan de Oñate was the original colonizer of New Mexico, in 1598. From
http://www.newmexicohistory.org/filedetails.php?fileID=312:

“In December 1598, on their way to Zuni, Capt. Juan de Zaldívar and
his soldiers stopped at Acoma for provisions. While there the Acomas
accused one of Zaldívar’s soldiers of stealing, and violating an Acoma
woman. The Acomas proceeded to kill Zaldívar and nearly a dozen of his
men, later claiming that the soldiers had demanded excessive amounts
of provisions. A Spanish punitive expedition ascended on Acoma
resulting in a three-day battle. When the fighting ended, several
hundred Indians were dead, and hundreds of surviving Acomas were held
prisoner and taken to Santa Domingo Pueblo to stand trial. Oñate
severely punished the people of Acoma. Men over twenty-five had one
foot cut off and were sentenced to twenty years of personal servitude
to the Spanish colonists; young men between the ages of twelve and
twenty-five received twenty years of personal servitude; young women
over twelve years of age were given twenty years of servitude; sixty
young girls were sent to Mexico City to serve in the convents there,
never to see their homeland again; and two Hopi men caught at the
Acoma battle had their right hand cut off and were set free to spread
the news of Spanish retribution.”

I think that it’s misleading to say about the early 1600’s, “The
Natives in the area submitted somewhat willingly, being a relatively
peace-loving people and the Spanish were not brutal unless there was
resistance to their presence whereupon their horses and steel weapons
and armor allowed them to be crushingly brutal.” When the Oñate
colonization expedition came to Okehowingeh (called San Juan Pueblo by
the Spaniards) near Española, they stole essential food supplies from
the Pueblo. The Pueblo Revolt of 1680 was triggered by the large-scale
Spanish execution of native priests. This doesn’t sound like “the
Spanish were not brutal unless there was resistance to their
presence”.

There’s an interesting twist to Oñate’s brutality to the Acoma
prisoners. A few years ago a memorial to Oñate was established north
of Española, on the way to Abiquiu. In front is an equestrian status
of Oñate. One morning it was discovered that in the night someone had
sawed off one of Oñate’s feet...

The Pueblo Revolt was fundamentally a success. Before 1680 Spanish
oppression was intolerable, hence the revolt, the first time a large
number of pueblos had collaborated on something. Immediately after the
revolt the leader, Popé, tried to eradicate all Spanish influences,
but his people were unwilling to follow his lead. For one thing, wool
is better than cotton for many uses. Also, during the period
1680-1692, in the absence of Spanish soldiers, the pueblos again faced
serious damage by Apaches and other marauders, and they came to
appreciate the protection that those Spanish soldiers had provided.
When the Spaniards returned, a new and better accommodation was worked
out. The Spanish eased off on their oppression, especially with a
“don’t ask, don’t tell” attitude toward native religion, which is part
of the reason for the secrecy even today about native rituals. And the
Pueblo peoples appreciated the greater security provided by the
Spanish presence.

The anthropologist Ruth Underhill wrote a book, “Red Man’s America”,
that I found very helpful in thinking about the conquest of the
Americas in a larger context. Although (because?) Underhill was both
knowledgeable about and sympathetic to Amerindian problems, part of
her book is a kind of “tough love”. She (like you, Steve, in your
references to Genghis Khan and other conquerors) points out that human
conquest was common in all places and all times, but that there have
been diverse responses by the conquered to being conquered. Some
conquered peoples learn from and even assimilate the conquerors (think
of the Norman conquest). Others give up (alas, the most common
reaction in the Americas, perhaps because of the unusually large
disparity between conqueror and conquered). Different groups in the
Americas responded in different ways. The Navajo, who came to the
Southwest only shortly before the Spaniards, are famous for successful
import of culture from their neighbors, first from the Pueblos and
later from the Spaniards, and later still from the Anglos.

Underhill makes an interesting observation about the possibilities for
one group to learn from the other. You’ve surely seen admiring lists
of the wonderful gifts of the New World to the Old World, including
such things as potatos. She points out that the comparable lists of
the wonderful gifts of the Old World to the New World are far far
longer (including sheep in New Mexico). She argued for a more
realistic, less simplistic, less overly romantic view of our shared
history, without in any way denying the blood and terror of the
conquest of the New World.

Bruce

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: The Lost Land

Jochen Fromm-5
In reply to this post by Jochen Fromm-5

Steve, thanks for the long and personal response. If it understand it right, then every American is living on occupied land, since every corner of America once belonged to native Americans. You are not the only one. In the land of the free and the home of the brave freedom apparently does not mean freedom for American Indians to live as they would like to do. But you can judge the situation better than I do. You are right, it really seems to be a complicated issue.

An old Chinese proverb says 'better to bend in the wind than to break': although the native Americans have to bend, they still can remain firmly rooted in their unique heritage and rich cultural history. Maybe art and/or tourism can offer a way out of the crisis. Who knows..

-J.

Sent from Android

Steve Smith <[hidden email]> wrote:
Jochen -

I appreciate this post.
> In the recent edition of National Geographic there
> is an article about Native Americans named
> "In the shadow of wounded knee"
> http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2012/08/pine-ridge/fuller-text
I am very sensitive to this issue because *I* literally own/live-on a
small piece of land that was expropriated from a Native tribe very
recently.    I also listen regularly to strong rhetoric against the
Israelis for their handling of the Palestinians while living amongst our
own Native Americans who have been treated (in past centuries) even more
brutally and in present times, perhaps less so, but still less than ideal.

Some on this list will perceive your post and my response perhaps as
"political"..  I try to remain relatively neutral in the politics, but I
believe this is a significant "humanitarian" issue.  And by humanitarian
I don't just mean the humanity of those being abused, I'm concerned for
the humanity of the abusers... roughly "us".   I am not religious so I
don't really think in terms of saved or lost "souls" but if I did, I'd
be much more worried about the souls of the occupiers than of the occupied.

And a simple answer to  simple question... NO, the cultural differences
(I'm reluctant to use the terms higher or lower) do not justify an
occupation.   And to this list we can add many more examples (e.g. South
Africa) and open questions such as the "Mongolian" occupation of much of
Eastern Europe and the middle east, or the Roman Occupation of north
africa, middle east, europe, or the Moorish occupation of Spain, or the
Native American (Asian?) occupation of North America (did they have a
big hand in the die-off of the megafauna of North America?).

My house is built on 1.5 acres among a section of 5.5 acres which Public
Service of NM took ownership for the purpose of building a natural gas
compression station.  I do not know their mechanism for this, it *may
have been* a trade, but it also may have been a simple request to the
State or Fed to "condemn" the parcel they wanted, literally taking it by
(legal) force from the San Ildefonso Pueblo, a very small "tribe" on a
very small "reservation", Perhaps a thousand  people on a few hundred
square miles.   Apparently PNM changed their minds and decided not to
complete the project but managed to hold on to the land and sell it to a
private (Anglo) individual who then subdivided and resold (to more
Anglos).   4 homes were built on these properties in the 1980's and in
2000 I bought mine from the original owner-builder.   Reviewing the
title search, I discovered the provenance.  It was a little
disturbing... the details I give here were not in the document, only the
record that PNM was the first "owner" after the pueblo itself.   The
rest I pieced together from other information.

So I am now, just like many of the Zionists in Israel, an occupier. I
feel somewhat innocent in my motivations, however i have to admit to
having coveted this location since before the homes were built 30 years
ago, knowing that it was "embedded" in the "reservation"... appreciating
it for it's location, including the proximity to this pueblo.
Romantically, I wanted to believe it was some small homestead from the
1800s which had been deeded to the family of the hispanic original
occupants when NM became a state in 1912.   Of course, the truth was not
nearly that romantic.

The Natives have a much less adversarial stance with the non-native here
than say in Palestine.  They were completely crushed into submission
centuries ago and have lived in relative peace with their "occupiers"
since then with only small abuses of the relationship such as the one
that lead to the expropriation of the piece of property that I live on. 
I have a number of Native friends from cultures distributed mostly
throughout the southwest of the US, and a few from farther north, but
really hardly any from the East.    I also work with the Institute of
American Indian Art in Santa Fe which puts me in contact with native
students and faculty from all over North America.  And I *should* put in
a plug for them... they accept students from anywhere, there is no
in/out state tuition... they are very affordable... many of their
students and studying there would be an amazing opportunity for anyone. 
www.iaia.org

New Mexico, as you may know, has the longest history of Native-European
interactions in the US.   The first incursion of the Spanish into what
is now the USA and the first permanent settlement happened about 30
miles from my house in the early 1500's well before the pilgrims or
Spanish settlements in Florida.  They were (as the Spanish did in those
times) looking for vast hoards of gold.  The Natives in the area
submitted somewhat willingly, being a relatively peace-loving people and
the Spanish were not brutal unless there was resistance to their
presence whereupon their horses and steel weapons and armor allowed them
to be crushingly brutal. Not long after their first settlement among the
Ohkay-Owinghe village, the Spanish Priests pulled rank on the Spanish
Noblemen and made them move the settlement to what is now Santa Fe... 
The priests, no matter what else you may think of them, apparently were
looking after the mortal as well as the immortal souls of the "children
of god" they had come here to "save"... they saw that the presence of
the Spaniards was causing the natives grave harm, even without overt
abuses... I'm sure there were individual abuses, but in general, it is
said that the Spanish "occupiers" were relatively not unkind in this
period, but the priests already recognized that their mere presence was
very disturbing to the natives well being.

As more Europeans arrived, things got worse of course and In the early
1600's the natives pulled together and managed a widespread rebellion
large enough to push the Spanish back south of what is modern day El
Paso, the entire occupied Rio Grande River Valley for nearly 400 miles
was expunged of these foreign devils.   A few years later, Juan de Onate
returned with a much more significant force and overwhelmed the natives
with their "modern weaponry", horses, and brutality.  A relatively small
but significant group held out against this force on top of a mesa
within view of my house... these native warriors were able to use thier
knowlege of the terrain and some help from their people now subjugated
in the region to remain at large for months.   Once they finally fell,
Onate and Spain "owned" the region again, and his first act to make the
point that rebellion would not be tolerated was to cut one foot off of
every able-bodied male of age to be a warrior as a preventative and a
reminder of his power (and intolerance).  It was nearly 300 years later
before the last of the Apache, a much more warlike nomadic people
closely related to the Navajo were finally subjugated in the region.  In
most if not all cases, subjugation of the native population in the
Americas was really near-extermination.  Both California and Texas, two
of our largest, richest States have almost NO indigenous people left... 
The bulk of the Native Americans *not* exterminated are in the
Southwest, concentrated in Arizona, New Mexico and Oklahoma.   This of
course, excludes the very large native Population in Alaska where their
remoteness protected them from abuse and exploitation somewhat until
modern technology and our thirst for oil caused us to overrun them as well.

I've lived among Natives all my life, meaning in regions where they
lived both on their own reservations and among the non-native
populations.   I've had several good friends who are native.   But I do
not pretend to understand the magnitude of what we did to them as a
population (even if I can pull the numbers and see the landscapes and
peoples).  One of my friends is Lakota Sioux and he grew up near Pine
Ridge and came of age (teenager) during the Wounded Knee debacle.   He
has spent his life becoming a very proud and capable artist and
craftsman but along the way he spent a great deal of it in the depths of
alcoholism and homelessness.  He has had a number of children, only a
few of whom he remains close to.   He is currently leading a large
effort/proposal among peers to win a grant to do an installation art
piece in South Dakota referencing not only the bad things that happened
to his people but also the good.  I have worked with him to develop a
digital maquette of an oversized pile of buffalo skulls to be
constructed next to I-70 in this area as well, a huge pyramid in
testimony to another travesty we perpetrated with our railroads and our
rifles.

But I do get queasy when our right-wing contingent supports Israel's
strong hawkish/occupational stances in Palestine and when some of our
left wing harsh attackers of Israel seem to forget our own (not that far
in the past) heritage as not just occupiers but exterminators,
perpetrators of genocide.   In many ways, our own brutality exceeded
anything that Israel has done by far.  This does not excuse the
Palestinian Occupation, but it should remind us that we have our own
wicked heritage which continues (as the stories in your links remind
us).   It is helpful to me in understanding the Israeli/Palestinian
problem to remind myself that I too am an occupier.  Anyone living in
the Americas are occupiers, etc.  My personal case is somewhat more
fresh, having been established as recently as the 1970's.

I'm not likely to deed over my "legal" property out of guilt, yet I
recognize that makes me little different than the Zionists who are
pushing back the borders of the Palestinians on a daily basis.   I came
to this location very respectful of the Natives, both intrinsically
because I've lived "among" them all my life, but also because I knew
that the land I was living on *was* expropriated from them at some point
in history.  While I like where I live very much, I would accept being
"relocated" to relieve my "occupation" of their territory...  I did
engage in the US real-estate market in good faith, and would expect
*someone* (US Govt, PNM?) to compensate me reasonably for this, but to
accept that my choice of "a good location" was misinformed and poorly
thought through and needed to be corrected.   If the bulk of my
financial security were not based in my home ownership, I might also
consider truly, simply returning the property to the tribe.  This of
course would be a drop in their bucket (1.5 acres out of a hundred
square miles) and a confrontation to my 3 neighbors who are in the same
circumstance, but perhaps spiritually a good gesture.

The region enjoys a colorful "tricultural" experience of Native,
Hispanic and Anglo and this is part of what I love about it, and perhaps
even the Natives themselves can appreciate (every pueblo has a catholic
church in it, most natives have hispanic surnames, and many enjoy the
lifestyles afforded by working the jobs provided by the "occupying
force").  But it is quite disorienting when a modern hispanic man (this
is a very coveted role in the region) rides his horse into the plaza in
Santa Fe each year during Fiesta decked in armor, sword in hand and the
entire population shouts "Onate!", celebrating his 'return' to Santa Fe.
   Nobody mentions the brutality of that moment, just the splendor.   A
friend of this list worked with Robert Mirabal (Taos Pueblo) last year
to help him produce an extremely moving production called "Poh Peh
Speaks", re-enacting the life and experience and perspective of the
Native Spirit starting with the experience of the Taos Pueblo Native who
instigated the uprising  nearly 400 years ago and leading up to the
present.  It is very moving.  He has even traveled to Spain this year to
present this performance.  I hope that he can continue to reach a wider
audience.

The problem of colonization and occupation is not an easy one.  It is
very hard to undo things that were done.   Things done centuries ago are
hard for one reason while things done today are hard for other reasons.

Good issue, IMO, but probably too rich for this lists blood.  We'll see.

- Steve

> It contains a map ("the lost land") which shows
> the shrinking land of the Indian reservation (esp. the ones from the
> Sioux) during the 19th century. Once the native Americans owned the
> whole country, from the Apache in the south west to the Massachusett
> in the north east. Then the British settlers and European colonists
> came, and in the name of their god they occupied and invaded the
> country. Now the Indians live in ever shrinking reservations.
> http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2012/08/pine-ridge/reservation-map
>
> Somehow this reminded me of the shrinking land
> of the Palestinian people. Palestinians are a bit
> like the native Americans, they are the native
> inhabitants of a countried occupied by foreign
> settlers. Today they live in a small confined area.
> http://sabbah.biz/mt/archives/2006/05/10/the-shrinking-map-of-palestine/
>
> In both cases, the occupying force justify the occupation with an
> higher entity which gave them the right to live there. Expelled from
> there original countries, the settlers (Puritans in American, Jews in
> Palestine) came to stay.
>
> In Australia, the native Australians ("Aborigines")
> are confined in aboriginal reserves. Like the
> native Americans, the indigenous Australians had not developed a
> system of writing. Does this
> lower cultural level justify an occupation?
>
> -J.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ============================================================
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
> lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org


============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: The Lost Land

Alfredo Covaleda Vélez

My Doctrine is: America for the American Indians. I mean the real native Americans from Alaska to Tierra del Fuego... like me or at least, almost the half of my genome.

Regards

2012/8/19 Jochen Fromm <[hidden email]>

Steve, thanks for the long and personal response. If it understand it right, then every American is living on occupied land, since every corner of America once belonged to native Americans. You are not the only one. In the land of the free and the home of the brave freedom apparently does not mean freedom for American Indians to live as they would like to do. But you can judge the situation better than I do. You are right, it really seems to be a complicated issue.

An old Chinese proverb says 'better to bend in the wind than to break': although the native Americans have to bend, they still can remain firmly rooted in their unique heritage and rich cultural history. Maybe art and/or tourism can offer a way out of the crisis. Who knows..

-J.

Sent from Android

Steve Smith <[hidden email]> wrote:
Jochen -

I appreciate this post.
> In the recent edition of National Geographic there
> is an article about Native Americans named
> "In the shadow of wounded knee"
> http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2012/08/pine-ridge/fuller-text
I am very sensitive to this issue because *I* literally own/live-on a
small piece of land that was expropriated from a Native tribe very
recently.    I also listen regularly to strong rhetoric against the
Israelis for their handling of the Palestinians while living amongst our
own Native Americans who have been treated (in past centuries) even more
brutally and in present times, perhaps less so, but still less than ideal.

Some on this list will perceive your post and my response perhaps as
"political"..  I try to remain relatively neutral in the politics, but I
believe this is a significant "humanitarian" issue.  And by humanitarian
I don't just mean the humanity of those being abused, I'm concerned for
the humanity of the abusers... roughly "us".   I am not religious so I
don't really think in terms of saved or lost "souls" but if I did, I'd
be much more worried about the souls of the occupiers than of the occupied.

And a simple answer to  simple question... NO, the cultural differences
(I'm reluctant to use the terms higher or lower) do not justify an
occupation.   And to this list we can add many more examples (e.g. South
Africa) and open questions such as the "Mongolian" occupation of much of
Eastern Europe and the middle east, or the Roman Occupation of north
africa, middle east, europe, or the Moorish occupation of Spain, or the
Native American (Asian?) occupation of North America (did they have a
big hand in the die-off of the megafauna of North America?).

My house is built on 1.5 acres among a section of 5.5 acres which Public
Service of NM took ownership for the purpose of building a natural gas
compression station.  I do not know their mechanism for this, it *may
have been* a trade, but it also may have been a simple request to the
State or Fed to "condemn" the parcel they wanted, literally taking it by
(legal) force from the San Ildefonso Pueblo, a very small "tribe" on a
very small "reservation", Perhaps a thousand  people on a few hundred
square miles.   Apparently PNM changed their minds and decided not to
complete the project but managed to hold on to the land and sell it to a
private (Anglo) individual who then subdivided and resold (to more
Anglos).   4 homes were built on these properties in the 1980's and in
2000 I bought mine from the original owner-builder.   Reviewing the
title search, I discovered the provenance.  It was a little
disturbing... the details I give here were not in the document, only the
record that PNM was the first "owner" after the pueblo itself.   The
rest I pieced together from other information.

So I am now, just like many of the Zionists in Israel, an occupier. I
feel somewhat innocent in my motivations, however i have to admit to
having coveted this location since before the homes were built 30 years
ago, knowing that it was "embedded" in the "reservation"... appreciating
it for it's location, including the proximity to this pueblo.
Romantically, I wanted to believe it was some small homestead from the
1800s which had been deeded to the family of the hispanic original
occupants when NM became a state in 1912.   Of course, the truth was not
nearly that romantic.

The Natives have a much less adversarial stance with the non-native here
than say in Palestine.  They were completely crushed into submission
centuries ago and have lived in relative peace with their "occupiers"
since then with only small abuses of the relationship such as the one
that lead to the expropriation of the piece of property that I live on. 
I have a number of Native friends from cultures distributed mostly
throughout the southwest of the US, and a few from farther north, but
really hardly any from the East.    I also work with the Institute of
American Indian Art in Santa Fe which puts me in contact with native
students and faculty from all over North America.  And I *should* put in
a plug for them... they accept students from anywhere, there is no
in/out state tuition... they are very affordable... many of their
students and studying there would be an amazing opportunity for anyone. 
www.iaia.org

New Mexico, as you may know, has the longest history of Native-European
interactions in the US.   The first incursion of the Spanish into what
is now the USA and the first permanent settlement happened about 30
miles from my house in the early 1500's well before the pilgrims or
Spanish settlements in Florida.  They were (as the Spanish did in those
times) looking for vast hoards of gold.  The Natives in the area
submitted somewhat willingly, being a relatively peace-loving people and
the Spanish were not brutal unless there was resistance to their
presence whereupon their horses and steel weapons and armor allowed them
to be crushingly brutal. Not long after their first settlement among the
Ohkay-Owinghe village, the Spanish Priests pulled rank on the Spanish
Noblemen and made them move the settlement to what is now Santa Fe... 
The priests, no matter what else you may think of them, apparently were
looking after the mortal as well as the immortal souls of the "children
of god" they had come here to "save"... they saw that the presence of
the Spaniards was causing the natives grave harm, even without overt
abuses... I'm sure there were individual abuses, but in general, it is
said that the Spanish "occupiers" were relatively not unkind in this
period, but the priests already recognized that their mere presence was
very disturbing to the natives well being.

As more Europeans arrived, things got worse of course and In the early
1600's the natives pulled together and managed a widespread rebellion
large enough to push the Spanish back south of what is modern day El
Paso, the entire occupied Rio Grande River Valley for nearly 400 miles
was expunged of these foreign devils.   A few years later, Juan de Onate
returned with a much more significant force and overwhelmed the natives
with their "modern weaponry", horses, and brutality.  A relatively small
but significant group held out against this force on top of a mesa
within view of my house... these native warriors were able to use thier
knowlege of the terrain and some help from their people now subjugated
in the region to remain at large for months.   Once they finally fell,
Onate and Spain "owned" the region again, and his first act to make the
point that rebellion would not be tolerated was to cut one foot off of
every able-bodied male of age to be a warrior as a preventative and a
reminder of his power (and intolerance).  It was nearly 300 years later
before the last of the Apache, a much more warlike nomadic people
closely related to the Navajo were finally subjugated in the region.  In
most if not all cases, subjugation of the native population in the
Americas was really near-extermination.  Both California and Texas, two
of our largest, richest States have almost NO indigenous people left... 
The bulk of the Native Americans *not* exterminated are in the
Southwest, concentrated in Arizona, New Mexico and Oklahoma.   This of
course, excludes the very large native Population in Alaska where their
remoteness protected them from abuse and exploitation somewhat until
modern technology and our thirst for oil caused us to overrun them as well.

I've lived among Natives all my life, meaning in regions where they
lived both on their own reservations and among the non-native
populations.   I've had several good friends who are native.   But I do
not pretend to understand the magnitude of what we did to them as a
population (even if I can pull the numbers and see the landscapes and
peoples).  One of my friends is Lakota Sioux and he grew up near Pine
Ridge and came of age (teenager) during the Wounded Knee debacle.   He
has spent his life becoming a very proud and capable artist and
craftsman but along the way he spent a great deal of it in the depths of
alcoholism and homelessness.  He has had a number of children, only a
few of whom he remains close to.   He is currently leading a large
effort/proposal among peers to win a grant to do an installation art
piece in South Dakota referencing not only the bad things that happened
to his people but also the good.  I have worked with him to develop a
digital maquette of an oversized pile of buffalo skulls to be
constructed next to I-70 in this area as well, a huge pyramid in
testimony to another travesty we perpetrated with our railroads and our
rifles.

But I do get queasy when our right-wing contingent supports Israel's
strong hawkish/occupational stances in Palestine and when some of our
left wing harsh attackers of Israel seem to forget our own (not that far
in the past) heritage as not just occupiers but exterminators,
perpetrators of genocide.   In many ways, our own brutality exceeded
anything that Israel has done by far.  This does not excuse the
Palestinian Occupation, but it should remind us that we have our own
wicked heritage which continues (as the stories in your links remind
us).   It is helpful to me in understanding the Israeli/Palestinian
problem to remind myself that I too am an occupier.  Anyone living in
the Americas are occupiers, etc.  My personal case is somewhat more
fresh, having been established as recently as the 1970's.

I'm not likely to deed over my "legal" property out of guilt, yet I
recognize that makes me little different than the Zionists who are
pushing back the borders of the Palestinians on a daily basis.   I came
to this location very respectful of the Natives, both intrinsically
because I've lived "among" them all my life, but also because I knew
that the land I was living on *was* expropriated from them at some point
in history.  While I like where I live very much, I would accept being
"relocated" to relieve my "occupation" of their territory...  I did
engage in the US real-estate market in good faith, and would expect
*someone* (US Govt, PNM?) to compensate me reasonably for this, but to
accept that my choice of "a good location" was misinformed and poorly
thought through and needed to be corrected.   If the bulk of my
financial security were not based in my home ownership, I might also
consider truly, simply returning the property to the tribe.  This of
course would be a drop in their bucket (1.5 acres out of a hundred
square miles) and a confrontation to my 3 neighbors who are in the same
circumstance, but perhaps spiritually a good gesture.

The region enjoys a colorful "tricultural" experience of Native,
Hispanic and Anglo and this is part of what I love about it, and perhaps
even the Natives themselves can appreciate (every pueblo has a catholic
church in it, most natives have hispanic surnames, and many enjoy the
lifestyles afforded by working the jobs provided by the "occupying
force").  But it is quite disorienting when a modern hispanic man (this
is a very coveted role in the region) rides his horse into the plaza in
Santa Fe each year during Fiesta decked in armor, sword in hand and the
entire population shouts "Onate!", celebrating his 'return' to Santa Fe.
   Nobody mentions the brutality of that moment, just the splendor.   A
friend of this list worked with Robert Mirabal (Taos Pueblo) last year
to help him produce an extremely moving production called "Poh Peh
Speaks", re-enacting the life and experience and perspective of the
Native Spirit starting with the experience of the Taos Pueblo Native who
instigated the uprising  nearly 400 years ago and leading up to the
present.  It is very moving.  He has even traveled to Spain this year to
present this performance.  I hope that he can continue to reach a wider
audience.

The problem of colonization and occupation is not an easy one.  It is
very hard to undo things that were done.   Things done centuries ago are
hard for one reason while things done today are hard for other reasons.

Good issue, IMO, but probably too rich for this lists blood.  We'll see.

- Steve
> It contains a map ("the lost land") which shows
> the shrinking land of the Indian reservation (esp. the ones from the
> Sioux) during the 19th century. Once the native Americans owned the
> whole country, from the Apache in the south west to the Massachusett
> in the north east. Then the British settlers and European colonists
> came, and in the name of their god they occupied and invaded the
> country. Now the Indians live in ever shrinking reservations.
> http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2012/08/pine-ridge/reservation-map
>
> Somehow this reminded me of the shrinking land
> of the Palestinian people. Palestinians are a bit
> like the native Americans, they are the native
> inhabitants of a countried occupied by foreign
> settlers. Today they live in a small confined area.
> http://sabbah.biz/mt/archives/2006/05/10/the-shrinking-map-of-palestine/
>
> In both cases, the occupying force justify the occupation with an
> higher entity which gave them the right to live there. Expelled from
> there original countries, the settlers (Puritans in American, Jews in
> Palestine) came to stay.
>
> In Australia, the native Australians ("Aborigines")
> are confined in aboriginal reserves. Like the
> native Americans, the indigenous Australians had not developed a
> system of writing. Does this
> lower cultural level justify an occupation?
>
> -J.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ============================================================
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
> lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org


============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org



--
Alfredo

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: The Lost Land

Roger Critchlow-2
In reply to this post by Steve Smith
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Steve Smith <[hidden email]> wrote:
I am not sure that "few people share this view anymore" regarding divine rights or maybe more to the point, "manifest destiny" or "might makes right".   I agree that in spirit most of us are on that page together, but in practice we may not be.


During my recent trip to Israel, I had suggested that the choices a society makes about its culture play a role in creating prosperity, and that the significant disparity between Israeli and Palestinian living standards was powerfully influenced by it. In some quarters, that comment became the subject of controversy.

But what exactly accounts for prosperity if not culture? In the case of the United States, it is a particular kind of culture that has made us the greatest economic power in the history of the earth. Many significant features come to mind: our work ethic, our appreciation for education, our willingness to take risks, our commitment to honor and oath, our family orientation, our devotion to a purpose greater than ourselves, our patriotism. But one feature of our culture that propels the American economy stands out above all others: freedom. The American economy is fueled by freedom. Free people and their free enterprises are what drive our economic vitality.

Blessed be those who prosper, for they are prosperous.

-- rec --

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: The Lost Land

Victoria Hughes
In reply to this post by Jochen Fromm-5
Alright, I'd like to add that colonization and opportunistic invasive behaviour seems to be an ongoing mode of life itself. We humans just worry about it. Cancer doesn't. Kudzu doesn't. Coockroaches don't. 

I am not at all excusing our behaviour. There is much that needs to be worried over, examined, and eventually, come hell or high water, changed.
But we are not the only species who does this. 

I hesitated to write this, since mine may be a highly politically incorrect position, but it needs saying. 
We can to shift our own response from concern to action, if we see it clearly.

and by the way- Vlad, are you still on this list? Weigh in here.

Tory



On Aug 19, 2012, at 2:25 PM, Jochen Fromm wrote:


Steve, thanks for the long and personal response. If it understand it right, then every American is living on occupied land, since every corner of America once belonged to native Americans. You are not the only one. In the land of the free and the home of the brave freedom apparently does not mean freedom for American Indians to live as they would like to do. But you can judge the situation better than I do. You are right, it really seems to be a complicated issue.

An old Chinese proverb says 'better to bend in the wind than to break': although the native Americans have to bend, they still can remain firmly rooted in their unique heritage and rich cultural history. Maybe art and/or tourism can offer a way out of the crisis. Who knows..

-J.

Sent from Android

Steve Smith <[hidden email]> wrote:
Jochen -

I appreciate this post.
> In the recent edition of National Geographic there
> is an article about Native Americans named
> "In the shadow of wounded knee"
> http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2012/08/pine-ridge/fuller-text
I am very sensitive to this issue because *I* literally own/live-on a
small piece of land that was expropriated from a Native tribe very
recently.    I also listen regularly to strong rhetoric against the
Israelis for their handling of the Palestinians while living amongst our
own Native Americans who have been treated (in past centuries) even more
brutally and in present times, perhaps less so, but still less than ideal.

Some on this list will perceive your post and my response perhaps as
"political"..  I try to remain relatively neutral in the politics, but I
believe this is a significant "humanitarian" issue.  And by humanitarian
I don't just mean the humanity of those being abused, I'm concerned for
the humanity of the abusers... roughly "us".   I am not religious so I
don't really think in terms of saved or lost "souls" but if I did, I'd
be much more worried about the souls of the occupiers than of the occupied.

And a simple answer to  simple question... NO, the cultural differences
(I'm reluctant to use the terms higher or lower) do not justify an
occupation.   And to this list we can add many more examples (e.g. South
Africa) and open questions such as the "Mongolian" occupation of much of
Eastern Europe and the middle east, or the Roman Occupation of north
africa, middle east, europe, or the Moorish occupation of Spain, or the
Native American (Asian?) occupation of North America (did they have a
big hand in the die-off of the megafauna of North America?).

My house is built on 1.5 acres among a section of 5.5 acres which Public
Service of NM took ownership for the purpose of building a natural gas
compression station.  I do not know their mechanism for this, it *may
have been* a trade, but it also may have been a simple request to the
State or Fed to "condemn" the parcel they wanted, literally taking it by
(legal) force from the San Ildefonso Pueblo, a very small "tribe" on a
very small "reservation", Perhaps a thousand  people on a few hundred
square miles.   Apparently PNM changed their minds and decided not to
complete the project but managed to hold on to the land and sell it to a
private (Anglo) individual who then subdivided and resold (to more
Anglos).   4 homes were built on these properties in the 1980's and in
2000 I bought mine from the original owner-builder.   Reviewing the
title search, I discovered the provenance.  It was a little
disturbing... the details I give here were not in the document, only the
record that PNM was the first "owner" after the pueblo itself.   The
rest I pieced together from other information.

So I am now, just like many of the Zionists in Israel, an occupier. I
feel somewhat innocent in my motivations, however i have to admit to
having coveted this location since before the homes were built 30 years
ago, knowing that it was "embedded" in the "reservation"... appreciating
it for it's location, including the proximity to this pueblo.
Romantically, I wanted to believe it was some small homestead from the
1800s which had been deeded to the family of the hispanic original
occupants when NM became a state in 1912.   Of course, the truth was not
nearly that romantic.

The Natives have a much less adversarial stance with the non-native here
than say in Palestine.  They were completely crushed into submission
centuries ago and have lived in relative peace with their "occupiers"
since then with only small abuses of the relationship such as the one
that lead to the expropriation of the piece of property that I live on. 
I have a number of Native friends from cultures distributed mostly
throughout the southwest of the US, and a few from farther north, but
really hardly any from the East.    I also work with the Institute of
American Indian Art in Santa Fe which puts me in contact with native
students and faculty from all over North America.  And I *should* put in
a plug for them... they accept students from anywhere, there is no
in/out state tuition... they are very affordable... many of their
students and studying there would be an amazing opportunity for anyone. 
www.iaia.org

New Mexico, as you may know, has the longest history of Native-European
interactions in the US.   The first incursion of the Spanish into what
is now the USA and the first permanent settlement happened about 30
miles from my house in the early 1500's well before the pilgrims or
Spanish settlements in Florida.  They were (as the Spanish did in those
times) looking for vast hoards of gold.  The Natives in the area
submitted somewhat willingly, being a relatively peace-loving people and
the Spanish were not brutal unless there was resistance to their
presence whereupon their horses and steel weapons and armor allowed them
to be crushingly brutal. Not long after their first settlement among the
Ohkay-Owinghe village, the Spanish Priests pulled rank on the Spanish
Noblemen and made them move the settlement to what is now Santa Fe... 
The priests, no matter what else you may think of them, apparently were
looking after the mortal as well as the immortal souls of the "children
of god" they had come here to "save"... they saw that the presence of
the Spaniards was causing the natives grave harm, even without overt
abuses... I'm sure there were individual abuses, but in general, it is
said that the Spanish "occupiers" were relatively not unkind in this
period, but the priests already recognized that their mere presence was
very disturbing to the natives well being.

As more Europeans arrived, things got worse of course and In the early
1600's the natives pulled together and managed a widespread rebellion
large enough to push the Spanish back south of what is modern day El
Paso, the entire occupied Rio Grande River Valley for nearly 400 miles
was expunged of these foreign devils.   A few years later, Juan de Onate
returned with a much more significant force and overwhelmed the natives
with their "modern weaponry", horses, and brutality.  A relatively small
but significant group held out against this force on top of a mesa
within view of my house... these native warriors were able to use thier
knowlege of the terrain and some help from their people now subjugated
in the region to remain at large for months.   Once they finally fell,
Onate and Spain "owned" the region again, and his first act to make the
point that rebellion would not be tolerated was to cut one foot off of
every able-bodied male of age to be a warrior as a preventative and a
reminder of his power (and intolerance).  It was nearly 300 years later
before the last of the Apache, a much more warlike nomadic people
closely related to the Navajo were finally subjugated in the region.  In
most if not all cases, subjugation of the native population in the
Americas was really near-extermination.  Both California and Texas, two
of our largest, richest States have almost NO indigenous people left... 
The bulk of the Native Americans *not* exterminated are in the
Southwest, concentrated in Arizona, New Mexico and Oklahoma.   This of
course, excludes the very large native Population in Alaska where their
remoteness protected them from abuse and exploitation somewhat until
modern technology and our thirst for oil caused us to overrun them as well.

I've lived among Natives all my life, meaning in regions where they
lived both on their own reservations and among the non-native
populations.   I've had several good friends who are native.   But I do
not pretend to understand the magnitude of what we did to them as a
population (even if I can pull the numbers and see the landscapes and
peoples).  One of my friends is Lakota Sioux and he grew up near Pine
Ridge and came of age (teenager) during the Wounded Knee debacle.   He
has spent his life becoming a very proud and capable artist and
craftsman but along the way he spent a great deal of it in the depths of
alcoholism and homelessness.  He has had a number of children, only a
few of whom he remains close to.   He is currently leading a large
effort/proposal among peers to win a grant to do an installation art
piece in South Dakota referencing not only the bad things that happened
to his people but also the good.  I have worked with him to develop a
digital maquette of an oversized pile of buffalo skulls to be
constructed next to I-70 in this area as well, a huge pyramid in
testimony to another travesty we perpetrated with our railroads and our
rifles.

But I do get queasy when our right-wing contingent supports Israel's
strong hawkish/occupational stances in Palestine and when some of our
left wing harsh attackers of Israel seem to forget our own (not that far
in the past) heritage as not just occupiers but exterminators,
perpetrators of genocide.   In many ways, our own brutality exceeded
anything that Israel has done by far.  This does not excuse the
Palestinian Occupation, but it should remind us that we have our own
wicked heritage which continues (as the stories in your links remind
us).   It is helpful to me in understanding the Israeli/Palestinian
problem to remind myself that I too am an occupier.  Anyone living in
the Americas are occupiers, etc.  My personal case is somewhat more
fresh, having been established as recently as the 1970's.

I'm not likely to deed over my "legal" property out of guilt, yet I
recognize that makes me little different than the Zionists who are
pushing back the borders of the Palestinians on a daily basis.   I came
to this location very respectful of the Natives, both intrinsically
because I've lived "among" them all my life, but also because I knew
that the land I was living on *was* expropriated from them at some point
in history.  While I like where I live very much, I would accept being
"relocated" to relieve my "occupation" of their territory...  I did
engage in the US real-estate market in good faith, and would expect
*someone* (US Govt, PNM?) to compensate me reasonably for this, but to
accept that my choice of "a good location" was misinformed and poorly
thought through and needed to be corrected.   If the bulk of my
financial security were not based in my home ownership, I might also
consider truly, simply returning the property to the tribe.  This of
course would be a drop in their bucket (1.5 acres out of a hundred
square miles) and a confrontation to my 3 neighbors who are in the same
circumstance, but perhaps spiritually a good gesture.

The region enjoys a colorful "tricultural" experience of Native,
Hispanic and Anglo and this is part of what I love about it, and perhaps
even the Natives themselves can appreciate (every pueblo has a catholic
church in it, most natives have hispanic surnames, and many enjoy the
lifestyles afforded by working the jobs provided by the "occupying
force").  But it is quite disorienting when a modern hispanic man (this
is a very coveted role in the region) rides his horse into the plaza in
Santa Fe each year during Fiesta decked in armor, sword in hand and the
entire population shouts "Onate!", celebrating his 'return' to Santa Fe.
   Nobody mentions the brutality of that moment, just the splendor.   A
friend of this list worked with Robert Mirabal (Taos Pueblo) last year
to help him produce an extremely moving production called "Poh Peh
Speaks", re-enacting the life and experience and perspective of the
Native Spirit starting with the experience of the Taos Pueblo Native who
instigated the uprising  nearly 400 years ago and leading up to the
present.  It is very moving.  He has even traveled to Spain this year to
present this performance.  I hope that he can continue to reach a wider
audience.

The problem of colonization and occupation is not an easy one.  It is
very hard to undo things that were done.   Things done centuries ago are
hard for one reason while things done today are hard for other reasons.

Good issue, IMO, but probably too rich for this lists blood.  We'll see.

- Steve

> It contains a map ("the lost land") which shows
> the shrinking land of the Indian reservation (esp. the ones from the
> Sioux) during the 19th century. Once the native Americans owned the
> whole country, from the Apache in the south west to the Massachusett
> in the north east. Then the British settlers and European colonists
> came, and in the name of their god they occupied and invaded the
> country. Now the Indians live in ever shrinking reservations.
> http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2012/08/pine-ridge/reservation-map
>
> Somehow this reminded me of the shrinking land
> of the Palestinian people. Palestinians are a bit
> like the native Americans, they are the native
> inhabitants of a countried occupied by foreign
> settlers. Today they live in a small confined area.
> http://sabbah.biz/mt/archives/2006/05/10/the-shrinking-map-of-palestine/
>
> In both cases, the occupying force justify the occupation with an
> higher entity which gave them the right to live there. Expelled from
> there original countries, the settlers (Puritans in American, Jews in
> Palestine) came to stay.
>
> In Australia, the native Australians ("Aborigines")
> are confined in aboriginal reserves. Like the
> native Americans, the indigenous Australians had not developed a
> system of writing. Does this
> lower cultural level justify an occupation?
>
> -J.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ============================================================
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
> lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org


============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org





============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: The Lost Land

Patrick Reilly
In reply to this post by Alfredo Covaleda Vélez
To all:

My doctrine is that the Earth is the property of no species nor
ethnicity thereof.  Only Ethiopia has indigenous human. The land of
North America could no more be exclusively possessed by, or be stolen
from, any tribe or nation than can the sky be possessed or stolen.
All property is temporary.

I prefer to work towards wise eco-stewardship and communal sharing of
the benefits of nature for all life rather than grieving about owning
and taking.

My Irish (an 1/4 Scott) heritage informs me that fighting over real
estate, even real estate inhabited for millennia by an "indigenous"
people, is an extreme waste of energy and blood.


Sincerely,


Patrick Reilly





On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Alfredo Covaleda
<[hidden email]> wrote:

>
> My Doctrine is: America for the American Indians. I mean the real native
> Americans from Alaska to Tierra del Fuego... like me or at least, almost the
> half of my genome.
>
> Regards
>
> 2012/8/19 Jochen Fromm <[hidden email]>
>>
>>
>> Steve, thanks for the long and personal response. If it understand it
>> right, then every American is living on occupied land, since every corner of
>> America once belonged to native Americans. You are not the only one. In the
>> land of the free and the home of the brave freedom apparently does not mean
>> freedom for American Indians to live as they would like to do. But you can
>> judge the situation better than I do. You are right, it really seems to be a
>> complicated issue.
>>
>> An old Chinese proverb says 'better to bend in the wind than to break':
>> although the native Americans have to bend, they still can remain firmly
>> rooted in their unique heritage and rich cultural history. Maybe art and/or
>> tourism can offer a way out of the crisis. Who knows..
>>
>> -J.
>>
>> Sent from Android
>>
>> Steve Smith <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> Jochen -
>>
>> I appreciate this post.
>> > In the recent edition of National Geographic there
>> > is an article about Native Americans named
>> > "In the shadow of wounded knee"
>> > http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2012/08/pine-ridge/fuller-text
>> I am very sensitive to this issue because *I* literally own/live-on a
>> small piece of land that was expropriated from a Native tribe very
>> recently.    I also listen regularly to strong rhetoric against the
>> Israelis for their handling of the Palestinians while living amongst our
>> own Native Americans who have been treated (in past centuries) even more
>> brutally and in present times, perhaps less so, but still less than ideal.
>>
>> Some on this list will perceive your post and my response perhaps as
>> "political"..  I try to remain relatively neutral in the politics, but I
>> believe this is a significant "humanitarian" issue.  And by humanitarian
>> I don't just mean the humanity of those being abused, I'm concerned for
>> the humanity of the abusers... roughly "us".   I am not religious so I
>> don't really think in terms of saved or lost "souls" but if I did, I'd
>> be much more worried about the souls of the occupiers than of the
>> occupied.
>>
>> And a simple answer to  simple question... NO, the cultural differences
>> (I'm reluctant to use the terms higher or lower) do not justify an
>> occupation.   And to this list we can add many more examples (e.g. South
>> Africa) and open questions such as the "Mongolian" occupation of much of
>> Eastern Europe and the middle east, or the Roman Occupation of north
>> africa, middle east, europe, or the Moorish occupation of Spain, or the
>> Native American (Asian?) occupation of North America (did they have a
>> big hand in the die-off of the megafauna of North America?).
>>
>> My house is built on 1.5 acres among a section of 5.5 acres which Public
>> Service of NM took ownership for the purpose of building a natural gas
>> compression station.  I do not know their mechanism for this, it *may
>> have been* a trade, but it also may have been a simple request to the
>> State or Fed to "condemn" the parcel they wanted, literally taking it by
>> (legal) force from the San Ildefonso Pueblo, a very small "tribe" on a
>> very small "reservation", Perhaps a thousand  people on a few hundred
>> square miles.   Apparently PNM changed their minds and decided not to
>> complete the project but managed to hold on to the land and sell it to a
>> private (Anglo) individual who then subdivided and resold (to more
>> Anglos).   4 homes were built on these properties in the 1980's and in
>> 2000 I bought mine from the original owner-builder.   Reviewing the
>> title search, I discovered the provenance.  It was a little
>> disturbing... the details I give here were not in the document, only the
>> record that PNM was the first "owner" after the pueblo itself.   The
>> rest I pieced together from other information.
>>
>> So I am now, just like many of the Zionists in Israel, an occupier. I
>> feel somewhat innocent in my motivations, however i have to admit to
>> having coveted this location since before the homes were built 30 years
>> ago, knowing that it was "embedded" in the "reservation"... appreciating
>> it for it's location, including the proximity to this pueblo.
>> Romantically, I wanted to believe it was some small homestead from the
>> 1800s which had been deeded to the family of the hispanic original
>> occupants when NM became a state in 1912.   Of course, the truth was not
>> nearly that romantic.
>>
>> The Natives have a much less adversarial stance with the non-native here
>> than say in Palestine.  They were completely crushed into submission
>> centuries ago and have lived in relative peace with their "occupiers"
>> since then with only small abuses of the relationship such as the one
>> that lead to the expropriation of the piece of property that I live on.
>> I have a number of Native friends from cultures distributed mostly
>> throughout the southwest of the US, and a few from farther north, but
>> really hardly any from the East.    I also work with the Institute of
>> American Indian Art in Santa Fe which puts me in contact with native
>> students and faculty from all over North America.  And I *should* put in
>> a plug for them... they accept students from anywhere, there is no
>> in/out state tuition... they are very affordable... many of their
>> students and studying there would be an amazing opportunity for anyone.
>> www.iaia.org
>>
>> New Mexico, as you may know, has the longest history of Native-European
>> interactions in the US.   The first incursion of the Spanish into what
>> is now the USA and the first permanent settlement happened about 30
>> miles from my house in the early 1500's well before the pilgrims or
>> Spanish settlements in Florida.  They were (as the Spanish did in those
>> times) looking for vast hoards of gold.  The Natives in the area
>> submitted somewhat willingly, being a relatively peace-loving people and
>> the Spanish were not brutal unless there was resistance to their
>> presence whereupon their horses and steel weapons and armor allowed them
>> to be crushingly brutal. Not long after their first settlement among the
>> Ohkay-Owinghe village, the Spanish Priests pulled rank on the Spanish
>> Noblemen and made them move the settlement to what is now Santa Fe...
>> The priests, no matter what else you may think of them, apparently were
>> looking after the mortal as well as the immortal souls of the "children
>> of god" they had come here to "save"... they saw that the presence of
>> the Spaniards was causing the natives grave harm, even without overt
>> abuses... I'm sure there were individual abuses, but in general, it is
>> said that the Spanish "occupiers" were relatively not unkind in this
>> period, but the priests already recognized that their mere presence was
>> very disturbing to the natives well being.
>>
>> As more Europeans arrived, things got worse of course and In the early
>> 1600's the natives pulled together and managed a widespread rebellion
>> large enough to push the Spanish back south of what is modern day El
>> Paso, the entire occupied Rio Grande River Valley for nearly 400 miles
>> was expunged of these foreign devils.   A few years later, Juan de Onate
>> returned with a much more significant force and overwhelmed the natives
>> with their "modern weaponry", horses, and brutality.  A relatively small
>> but significant group held out against this force on top of a mesa
>> within view of my house... these native warriors were able to use thier
>> knowlege of the terrain and some help from their people now subjugated
>> in the region to remain at large for months.   Once they finally fell,
>> Onate and Spain "owned" the region again, and his first act to make the
>> point that rebellion would not be tolerated was to cut one foot off of
>> every able-bodied male of age to be a warrior as a preventative and a
>> reminder of his power (and intolerance).  It was nearly 300 years later
>> before the last of the Apache, a much more warlike nomadic people
>> closely related to the Navajo were finally subjugated in the region.  In
>> most if not all cases, subjugation of the native population in the
>> Americas was really near-extermination.  Both California and Texas, two
>> of our largest, richest States have almost NO indigenous people left...
>> The bulk of the Native Americans *not* exterminated are in the
>> Southwest, concentrated in Arizona, New Mexico and Oklahoma.   This of
>> course, excludes the very large native Population in Alaska where their
>> remoteness protected them from abuse and exploitation somewhat until
>> modern technology and our thirst for oil caused us to overrun them as
>> well.
>>
>> I've lived among Natives all my life, meaning in regions where they
>> lived both on their own reservations and among the non-native
>> populations.   I've had several good friends who are native.   But I do
>> not pretend to understand the magnitude of what we did to them as a
>> population (even if I can pull the numbers and see the landscapes and
>> peoples).  One of my friends is Lakota Sioux and he grew up near Pine
>> Ridge and came of age (teenager) during the Wounded Knee debacle.   He
>> has spent his life becoming a very proud and capable artist and
>> craftsman but along the way he spent a great deal of it in the depths of
>> alcoholism and homelessness.  He has had a number of children, only a
>> few of whom he remains close to.   He is currently leading a large
>> effort/proposal among peers to win a grant to do an installation art
>> piece in South Dakota referencing not only the bad things that happened
>> to his people but also the good.  I have worked with him to develop a
>> digital maquette of an oversized pile of buffalo skulls to be
>> constructed next to I-70 in this area as well, a huge pyramid in
>> testimony to another travesty we perpetrated with our railroads and our
>> rifles.
>>
>> But I do get queasy when our right-wing contingent supports Israel's
>> strong hawkish/occupational stances in Palestine and when some of our
>> left wing harsh attackers of Israel seem to forget our own (not that far
>> in the past) heritage as not just occupiers but exterminators,
>> perpetrators of genocide.   In many ways, our own brutality exceeded
>> anything that Israel has done by far.  This does not excuse the
>> Palestinian Occupation, but it should remind us that we have our own
>> wicked heritage which continues (as the stories in your links remind
>> us).   It is helpful to me in understanding the Israeli/Palestinian
>> problem to remind myself that I too am an occupier.  Anyone living in
>> the Americas are occupiers, etc.  My personal case is somewhat more
>> fresh, having been established as recently as the 1970's.
>>
>> I'm not likely to deed over my "legal" property out of guilt, yet I
>> recognize that makes me little different than the Zionists who are
>> pushing back the borders of the Palestinians on a daily basis.   I came
>> to this location very respectful of the Natives, both intrinsically
>> because I've lived "among" them all my life, but also because I knew
>> that the land I was living on *was* expropriated from them at some point
>> in history.  While I like where I live very much, I would accept being
>> "relocated" to relieve my "occupation" of their territory...  I did
>> engage in the US real-estate market in good faith, and would expect
>> *someone* (US Govt, PNM?) to compensate me reasonably for this, but to
>> accept that my choice of "a good location" was misinformed and poorly
>> thought through and needed to be corrected.   If the bulk of my
>> financial security were not based in my home ownership, I might also
>> consider truly, simply returning the property to the tribe.  This of
>> course would be a drop in their bucket (1.5 acres out of a hundred
>> square miles) and a confrontation to my 3 neighbors who are in the same
>> circumstance, but perhaps spiritually a good gesture.
>>
>> The region enjoys a colorful "tricultural" experience of Native,
>> Hispanic and Anglo and this is part of what I love about it, and perhaps
>> even the Natives themselves can appreciate (every pueblo has a catholic
>> church in it, most natives have hispanic surnames, and many enjoy the
>> lifestyles afforded by working the jobs provided by the "occupying
>> force").  But it is quite disorienting when a modern hispanic man (this
>> is a very coveted role in the region) rides his horse into the plaza in
>> Santa Fe each year during Fiesta decked in armor, sword in hand and the
>> entire population shouts "Onate!", celebrating his 'return' to Santa Fe.
>>    Nobody mentions the brutality of that moment, just the splendor.   A
>> friend of this list worked with Robert Mirabal (Taos Pueblo) last year
>> to help him produce an extremely moving production called "Poh Peh
>> Speaks", re-enacting the life and experience and perspective of the
>> Native Spirit starting with the experience of the Taos Pueblo Native who
>> instigated the uprising  nearly 400 years ago and leading up to the
>> present.  It is very moving.  He has even traveled to Spain this year to
>> present this performance.  I hope that he can continue to reach a wider
>> audience.
>>
>> The problem of colonization and occupation is not an easy one.  It is
>> very hard to undo things that were done.   Things done centuries ago are
>> hard for one reason while things done today are hard for other reasons.
>>
>> Good issue, IMO, but probably too rich for this lists blood.  We'll see.
>>
>> - Steve
>> > It contains a map ("the lost land") which shows
>> > the shrinking land of the Indian reservation (esp. the ones from the
>> > Sioux) during the 19th century. Once the native Americans owned the
>> > whole country, from the Apache in the south west to the Massachusett
>> > in the north east. Then the British settlers and European colonists
>> > came, and in the name of their god they occupied and invaded the
>> > country. Now the Indians live in ever shrinking reservations.
>> > http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2012/08/pine-ridge/reservation-map
>> >
>> > Somehow this reminded me of the shrinking land
>> > of the Palestinian people. Palestinians are a bit
>> > like the native Americans, they are the native
>> > inhabitants of a countried occupied by foreign
>> > settlers. Today they live in a small confined area.
>> > http://sabbah.biz/mt/archives/2006/05/10/the-shrinking-map-of-palestine/
>> >
>> > In both cases, the occupying force justify the occupation with an
>> > higher entity which gave them the right to live there. Expelled from
>> > there original countries, the settlers (Puritans in American, Jews in
>> > Palestine) came to stay.
>> >
>> > In Australia, the native Australians ("Aborigines")
>> > are confined in aboriginal reserves. Like the
>> > native Americans, the indigenous Australians had not developed a
>> > system of writing. Does this
>> > lower cultural level justify an occupation?
>> >
>> > -J.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ============================================================
>> > FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
>> > Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
>> > lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
>>
>>
>> ============================================================
>> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
>> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
>> lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
>>
>> ============================================================
>> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
>> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
>> lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
>
>
>
>
> --
> Alfredo
>
> ============================================================
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
> lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org



--
The information contained in this transmission may contain privileged
and confidential information.  It is intended only for the use of the
person(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient,  you are
hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or
duplication of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you are
not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email
and destroy all copies of the original message. To reply to our email
administrator directly, please send an email to
[hidden email].

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: The Lost Land

Pamela McCorduck
In reply to this post by Victoria Hughes
Tory makes an unarguable point, that we are far from alone as a species in opportunistic, invasive behavior. And, as she goes on to point out, we worry about it, other species don't. She also says "there is much to be worried over, examined, and…changed."

We can and slowly do change our behavior. When I wrote that attitudes about colonialism changed as time went on, that's just what I meant. I fear to say our notions of ethical behavior have evolved, but I'll say it anyway. Even when we went into Iraq, we didn't say: Hey, we need the oil, move over. Our then government felt obliged to clothe that invasion in all sorts of pious and fake excuses. The fact is, we--or they--thought we needed the oil, and American need was paramount. It isn't pretty, but there it is.

Effecting the change is neither simple nor easy.

P.



============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org


"Bounded Rationality,"  by Pamela McCorduck, the second novel in the series, Santa Fe Stories, Sunstone Press, is now available both as ink-on-paper and as an e-book.


“The person, be it gentleman or lady, who has not pleasure in a good novel, must be intolerably stupid.” 
― Jane Austen







============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: The Lost Land

Alfredo Covaleda Vélez
In reply to this post by Alfredo Covaleda Vélez

Of course I was kidding. Doctrine is maybe the term that I like the less. We, the human kind, need more objectivity, more generosity and less fundamentalisms; but naturally it is an utopia to think that doctrines will not rule the world. Societies will continue fighting because of ethnicity, religion and politics. Doctrine makes us different and is the argument behind the struggle for the power and the perfect excuse to do what humans like the most: to make the war. What a savage and pitiful specie is the Homo Sapiens!!.


2012/8/19 Alfredo Covaleda <[hidden email]>

My Doctrine is: America for the American Indians. I mean the real native Americans from Alaska to Tierra del Fuego... like me or at least, almost the half of my genome.

Regards


2012/8/19 Jochen Fromm <[hidden email]>

Steve, thanks for the long and personal response. If it understand it right, then every American is living on occupied land, since every corner of America once belonged to native Americans. You are not the only one. In the land of the free and the home of the brave freedom apparently does not mean freedom for American Indians to live as they would like to do. But you can judge the situation better than I do. You are right, it really seems to be a complicated issue.

An old Chinese proverb says 'better to bend in the wind than to break': although the native Americans have to bend, they still can remain firmly rooted in their unique heritage and rich cultural history. Maybe art and/or tourism can offer a way out of the crisis. Who knows..

-J.

Sent from Android

Steve Smith <[hidden email]> wrote:
Jochen -

I appreciate this post.
> In the recent edition of National Geographic there
> is an article about Native Americans named
> "In the shadow of wounded knee"
> http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2012/08/pine-ridge/fuller-text
I am very sensitive to this issue because *I* literally own/live-on a
small piece of land that was expropriated from a Native tribe very
recently.    I also listen regularly to strong rhetoric against the
Israelis for their handling of the Palestinians while living amongst our
own Native Americans who have been treated (in past centuries) even more
brutally and in present times, perhaps less so, but still less than ideal.

Some on this list will perceive your post and my response perhaps as
"political"..  I try to remain relatively neutral in the politics, but I
believe this is a significant "humanitarian" issue.  And by humanitarian
I don't just mean the humanity of those being abused, I'm concerned for
the humanity of the abusers... roughly "us".   I am not religious so I
don't really think in terms of saved or lost "souls" but if I did, I'd
be much more worried about the souls of the occupiers than of the occupied.

And a simple answer to  simple question... NO, the cultural differences
(I'm reluctant to use the terms higher or lower) do not justify an
occupation.   And to this list we can add many more examples (e.g. South
Africa) and open questions such as the "Mongolian" occupation of much of
Eastern Europe and the middle east, or the Roman Occupation of north
africa, middle east, europe, or the Moorish occupation of Spain, or the
Native American (Asian?) occupation of North America (did they have a
big hand in the die-off of the megafauna of North America?).

My house is built on 1.5 acres among a section of 5.5 acres which Public
Service of NM took ownership for the purpose of building a natural gas
compression station.  I do not know their mechanism for this, it *may
have been* a trade, but it also may have been a simple request to the
State or Fed to "condemn" the parcel they wanted, literally taking it by
(legal) force from the San Ildefonso Pueblo, a very small "tribe" on a
very small "reservation", Perhaps a thousand  people on a few hundred
square miles.   Apparently PNM changed their minds and decided not to
complete the project but managed to hold on to the land and sell it to a
private (Anglo) individual who then subdivided and resold (to more
Anglos).   4 homes were built on these properties in the 1980's and in
2000 I bought mine from the original owner-builder.   Reviewing the
title search, I discovered the provenance.  It was a little
disturbing... the details I give here were not in the document, only the
record that PNM was the first "owner" after the pueblo itself.   The
rest I pieced together from other information.

So I am now, just like many of the Zionists in Israel, an occupier. I
feel somewhat innocent in my motivations, however i have to admit to
having coveted this location since before the homes were built 30 years
ago, knowing that it was "embedded" in the "reservation"... appreciating
it for it's location, including the proximity to this pueblo.
Romantically, I wanted to believe it was some small homestead from the
1800s which had been deeded to the family of the hispanic original
occupants when NM became a state in 1912.   Of course, the truth was not
nearly that romantic.

The Natives have a much less adversarial stance with the non-native here
than say in Palestine.  They were completely crushed into submission
centuries ago and have lived in relative peace with their "occupiers"
since then with only small abuses of the relationship such as the one
that lead to the expropriation of the piece of property that I live on. 
I have a number of Native friends from cultures distributed mostly
throughout the southwest of the US, and a few from farther north, but
really hardly any from the East.    I also work with the Institute of
American Indian Art in Santa Fe which puts me in contact with native
students and faculty from all over North America.  And I *should* put in
a plug for them... they accept students from anywhere, there is no
in/out state tuition... they are very affordable... many of their
students and studying there would be an amazing opportunity for anyone. 
www.iaia.org

New Mexico, as you may know, has the longest history of Native-European
interactions in the US.   The first incursion of the Spanish into what
is now the USA and the first permanent settlement happened about 30
miles from my house in the early 1500's well before the pilgrims or
Spanish settlements in Florida.  They were (as the Spanish did in those
times) looking for vast hoards of gold.  The Natives in the area
submitted somewhat willingly, being a relatively peace-loving people and
the Spanish were not brutal unless there was resistance to their
presence whereupon their horses and steel weapons and armor allowed them
to be crushingly brutal. Not long after their first settlement among the
Ohkay-Owinghe village, the Spanish Priests pulled rank on the Spanish
Noblemen and made them move the settlement to what is now Santa Fe... 
The priests, no matter what else you may think of them, apparently were
looking after the mortal as well as the immortal souls of the "children
of god" they had come here to "save"... they saw that the presence of
the Spaniards was causing the natives grave harm, even without overt
abuses... I'm sure there were individual abuses, but in general, it is
said that the Spanish "occupiers" were relatively not unkind in this
period, but the priests already recognized that their mere presence was
very disturbing to the natives well being.

As more Europeans arrived, things got worse of course and In the early
1600's the natives pulled together and managed a widespread rebellion
large enough to push the Spanish back south of what is modern day El
Paso, the entire occupied Rio Grande River Valley for nearly 400 miles
was expunged of these foreign devils.   A few years later, Juan de Onate
returned with a much more significant force and overwhelmed the natives
with their "modern weaponry", horses, and brutality.  A relatively small
but significant group held out against this force on top of a mesa
within view of my house... these native warriors were able to use thier
knowlege of the terrain and some help from their people now subjugated
in the region to remain at large for months.   Once they finally fell,
Onate and Spain "owned" the region again, and his first act to make the
point that rebellion would not be tolerated was to cut one foot off of
every able-bodied male of age to be a warrior as a preventative and a
reminder of his power (and intolerance).  It was nearly 300 years later
before the last of the Apache, a much more warlike nomadic people
closely related to the Navajo were finally subjugated in the region.  In
most if not all cases, subjugation of the native population in the
Americas was really near-extermination.  Both California and Texas, two
of our largest, richest States have almost NO indigenous people left... 
The bulk of the Native Americans *not* exterminated are in the
Southwest, concentrated in Arizona, New Mexico and Oklahoma.   This of
course, excludes the very large native Population in Alaska where their
remoteness protected them from abuse and exploitation somewhat until
modern technology and our thirst for oil caused us to overrun them as well.

I've lived among Natives all my life, meaning in regions where they
lived both on their own reservations and among the non-native
populations.   I've had several good friends who are native.   But I do
not pretend to understand the magnitude of what we did to them as a
population (even if I can pull the numbers and see the landscapes and
peoples).  One of my friends is Lakota Sioux and he grew up near Pine
Ridge and came of age (teenager) during the Wounded Knee debacle.   He
has spent his life becoming a very proud and capable artist and
craftsman but along the way he spent a great deal of it in the depths of
alcoholism and homelessness.  He has had a number of children, only a
few of whom he remains close to.   He is currently leading a large
effort/proposal among peers to win a grant to do an installation art
piece in South Dakota referencing not only the bad things that happened
to his people but also the good.  I have worked with him to develop a
digital maquette of an oversized pile of buffalo skulls to be
constructed next to I-70 in this area as well, a huge pyramid in
testimony to another travesty we perpetrated with our railroads and our
rifles.

But I do get queasy when our right-wing contingent supports Israel's
strong hawkish/occupational stances in Palestine and when some of our
left wing harsh attackers of Israel seem to forget our own (not that far
in the past) heritage as not just occupiers but exterminators,
perpetrators of genocide.   In many ways, our own brutality exceeded
anything that Israel has done by far.  This does not excuse the
Palestinian Occupation, but it should remind us that we have our own
wicked heritage which continues (as the stories in your links remind
us).   It is helpful to me in understanding the Israeli/Palestinian
problem to remind myself that I too am an occupier.  Anyone living in
the Americas are occupiers, etc.  My personal case is somewhat more
fresh, having been established as recently as the 1970's.

I'm not likely to deed over my "legal" property out of guilt, yet I
recognize that makes me little different than the Zionists who are
pushing back the borders of the Palestinians on a daily basis.   I came
to this location very respectful of the Natives, both intrinsically
because I've lived "among" them all my life, but also because I knew
that the land I was living on *was* expropriated from them at some point
in history.  While I like where I live very much, I would accept being
"relocated" to relieve my "occupation" of their territory...  I did
engage in the US real-estate market in good faith, and would expect
*someone* (US Govt, PNM?) to compensate me reasonably for this, but to
accept that my choice of "a good location" was misinformed and poorly
thought through and needed to be corrected.   If the bulk of my
financial security were not based in my home ownership, I might also
consider truly, simply returning the property to the tribe.  This of
course would be a drop in their bucket (1.5 acres out of a hundred
square miles) and a confrontation to my 3 neighbors who are in the same
circumstance, but perhaps spiritually a good gesture.

The region enjoys a colorful "tricultural" experience of Native,
Hispanic and Anglo and this is part of what I love about it, and perhaps
even the Natives themselves can appreciate (every pueblo has a catholic
church in it, most natives have hispanic surnames, and many enjoy the
lifestyles afforded by working the jobs provided by the "occupying
force").  But it is quite disorienting when a modern hispanic man (this
is a very coveted role in the region) rides his horse into the plaza in
Santa Fe each year during Fiesta decked in armor, sword in hand and the
entire population shouts "Onate!", celebrating his 'return' to Santa Fe.
   Nobody mentions the brutality of that moment, just the splendor.   A
friend of this list worked with Robert Mirabal (Taos Pueblo) last year
to help him produce an extremely moving production called "Poh Peh
Speaks", re-enacting the life and experience and perspective of the
Native Spirit starting with the experience of the Taos Pueblo Native who
instigated the uprising  nearly 400 years ago and leading up to the
present.  It is very moving.  He has even traveled to Spain this year to
present this performance.  I hope that he can continue to reach a wider
audience.

The problem of colonization and occupation is not an easy one.  It is
very hard to undo things that were done.   Things done centuries ago are
hard for one reason while things done today are hard for other reasons.

Good issue, IMO, but probably too rich for this lists blood.  We'll see.

- Steve
> It contains a map ("the lost land") which shows
> the shrinking land of the Indian reservation (esp. the ones from the
> Sioux) during the 19th century. Once the native Americans owned the
> whole country, from the Apache in the south west to the Massachusett
> in the north east. Then the British settlers and European colonists
> came, and in the name of their god they occupied and invaded the
> country. Now the Indians live in ever shrinking reservations.
> http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2012/08/pine-ridge/reservation-map
>
> Somehow this reminded me of the shrinking land
> of the Palestinian people. Palestinians are a bit
> like the native Americans, they are the native
> inhabitants of a countried occupied by foreign
> settlers. Today they live in a small confined area.
> http://sabbah.biz/mt/archives/2006/05/10/the-shrinking-map-of-palestine/
>
> In both cases, the occupying force justify the occupation with an
> higher entity which gave them the right to live there. Expelled from
> there original countries, the settlers (Puritans in American, Jews in
> Palestine) came to stay.
>
> In Australia, the native Australians ("Aborigines")
> are confined in aboriginal reserves. Like the
> native Americans, the indigenous Australians had not developed a
> system of writing. Does this
> lower cultural level justify an occupation?
>
> -J.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ============================================================
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
> lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org


============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org



--
Alfredo



--
Alfredo

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: The Lost Land

Bruce Sherwood
I draw everyone's attention to the widely unknown fact that violence
in the world has drastically diminished, which is something to be
celebrated (and extended). See the Stephen Pinker book "The Better
Angels of our Nature". To give just one striking example that he
cites, only a few hundred years ago the murder rate per year per
100,000 people in England was several hundred, but now it is ONE
murder! The huge fall in violence of all kinds has gone mostly
unnoticed in part because news reports concentrate on violence,
leaving the impression that violence has if anything increased.

Pinker also reviews the extensive scholarship devoted to trying to
understand the causes of this huge change.

Bruce

On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 9:45 PM, Alfredo Covaleda
<[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Of course I was kidding. Doctrine is maybe the term that I like the less.
> We, the human kind, need more objectivity, more generosity and less
> fundamentalisms; but naturally it is an utopia to think that doctrines will
> not rule the world. Societies will continue fighting because of ethnicity,
> religion and politics. Doctrine makes us different and is the argument
> behind the struggle for the power and the perfect excuse to do what humans
> like the most: to make the war. What a savage and pitiful specie is the Homo
> Sapiens!!.

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: The Lost Land

Steve Smith
Boys and Girls!

I feel sad to be leaving this conversation just as it is heating up
(this one and the one on the Iowa Markets predicting Obama well above
Romney) but I'm likely to drop out for several reasons, some fun, some
not so much.

On my way out of the conversation (hit and run), I'd like to thank Bruce
for correcting my goofy errors in timing and identity re: Pueblo Revolt
and DeVargas/Onate, etc.   I suppose I could fact check my rants and
raves a little better... in any case, I thank Bruce for fixing that up
for me and doing it in a polite and respectful way...

I have plenty opinions (and tedious anecdotes) about several things said
here, but I just don't have the bandwidth to blurt them out (much less
do some fact checking before hitting send)!

I *do* second Pamela's kudos to Tory on her comments (having just
watched my vegetarian daughter stoicly crush and dispose of a cochroach
just now).  I'm also with Tory and want to hear the colorly insightful
perspective we used to get from Vlad.   I hope he's just napping, not
fallen off the planet!

Also, I remember saying I didn't want to be political because despite
what feels like a disproportionate number of Lefties (the risk of
yuppiness and academia?), I know we have some pretty staunch righties
too.    A lot of folks here live most of their time in their heads so
I'd not be surprised if there werent a few more staunch ???XXXYYzzz... s
here roughly anarcho-libertarian-independent  ???  which I paint myself
and Doug with BTW.   Doug and I seem to agree on a lot (including the
taste of various distilled spirits), excepting I don't have an axe to
grind with Joseph Smith (no relation) or his followers.

I'm not completely sure I think Peggy understood my point, but I was
glad to hear her thinking this was a good conversation... I'm enjoying
the sound of the hornets buzzing as well! (I suspect *this* is a
mischaracterization of Peggy's comments!).

Carry on!
  - Steve


> I draw everyone's attention to the widely unknown fact that violence
> in the world has drastically diminished, which is something to be
> celebrated (and extended). See the Stephen Pinker book "The Better
> Angels of our Nature". To give just one striking example that he
> cites, only a few hundred years ago the murder rate per year per
> 100,000 people in England was several hundred, but now it is ONE
> murder! The huge fall in violence of all kinds has gone mostly
> unnoticed in part because news reports concentrate on violence,
> leaving the impression that violence has if anything increased.
>
> Pinker also reviews the extensive scholarship devoted to trying to
> understand the causes of this huge change.
>
> Bruce
>
> On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 9:45 PM, Alfredo Covaleda
> <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> Of course I was kidding. Doctrine is maybe the term that I like the less.
>> We, the human kind, need more objectivity, more generosity and less
>> fundamentalisms; but naturally it is an utopia to think that doctrines will
>> not rule the world. Societies will continue fighting because of ethnicity,
>> religion and politics. Doctrine makes us different and is the argument
>> behind the struggle for the power and the perfect excuse to do what humans
>> like the most: to make the war. What a savage and pitiful specie is the Homo
>> Sapiens!!.
> ============================================================
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
> lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org


============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org