Outbreak Simulation

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
18 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Outbreak Simulation

Jochen Fromm-5
Nice simulation:
https://meltingasphalt.com/interactive/outbreak/

-J.




============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Outbreak Simulation

Patrick Reilly
I can't find the Zoom invite.  Could you invite me?


On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 3:26 AM Jochen Fromm <[hidden email]> wrote:
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove


--
The information contained in this transmission may contain privileged and confidential information.  It is intended only for the use of the person(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient,  you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or duplication of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. To reply to our email administrator directly, please send an email to [hidden email].

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Outbreak Simulation

jon zingale
In reply to this post by Jochen Fromm-5
At home, we are discussing the effect of the virus and the effect
of social distancing on individuals that rely on soup kitchens.
What strategies can Friam produce for feeding these people
that is consistent with the social distancing strategy?
For bonus points, please justify posted strategies with a model, 
or simulation.

Jon

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Outbreak Simulation

thompnickson2

Hi, Y’all,

 

Just got done with the FRIAM ZOOM session, which seemed to divide into two sessions, equally interesting, but quite different.  Session one was an expert discussion of the complexity dynamics of the pandemic and how technology could be used to maximize privacy while slowing transmission.  Session two was an exploration of what it is actually going to be like to live through the next six months, and what, if anything we should be doing, psychologically and practically, to prepare ourselves for it. 

 

Most riveting quote of the day, perhaps more riveting because it was so paradoxical:

 

“One thing you better have in mind as you plunge into a phase transition is a clear idea of how you want the world to look like after you come through it.”

 

Most actionable suggestion of the day: 

 

Insist by every means possible that local and state election officials begin to plan (and practice in the primaries) a non-in-person voting system that will be regarded as legitimate by the general public.

 

Personally, speaking for myself, I was left with one meta-question: 

 

How much time do we devote to trying to imagine the unimaginable.  One the one hand, it seems like we have to; on the otherhand, trying to do it is so scarey that it runs the risk of bringing all thought to a stop. 

 

I know how to handle it individually:  If I start to panic, I just climb into bed, imagine that I am never going to wake up, and go to sleep.  But conversation-wise, I am not so sure.  Perhaps agree to devote small portion of the conversation to catastrophic thinking, with a clear boundary?  Assuming we can do that,  here is my suggestion for a catastrophic discussion:

 

Worse than the worst predictions for the virus acting alone, are the consequences of the virus acting in concert with a total collapse of our institututions, food production, distributution, our elections, public order, etc. (e.g., Who is going to plant and pick the crops if the borders are closed?  Draft out-of-school college students?)  Our country is run by a gerontocracy, which, being human, will try above all to protect themselves. But they will mosty fail, in any case,  because they are the most vulnerable. What if, in their vain attempt to protect themselves, they bring down the whole?   

 

Ok.  Now I am going to bed.

 

Nick

 

Nicholas Thompson

Emeritus Professor of Ethology and Psychology

Clark University

[hidden email]

https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/

 

 

From: Friam <[hidden email]> On Behalf Of Jon Zingale
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2020 12:02 PM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Outbreak Simulation

 

At home, we are discussing the effect of the virus and the effect

of social distancing on individuals that rely on soup kitchens.

What strategies can Friam produce for feeding these people

that is consistent with the social distancing strategy?

For bonus points, please justify posted strategies with a model, 

or simulation.

 

Jon


============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Outbreak Simulation

Frank Wimberly-2
Don't go to sleep, please

I think our institutions are more robust and durable than you do.

Frank
---
Frank C. Wimberly
505 670-9918
Santa Fe, NM

On Fri, Mar 20, 2020, 12:55 PM <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi, Y’all,

 

Just got done with the FRIAM ZOOM session, which seemed to divide into two sessions, equally interesting, but quite different.  Session one was an expert discussion of the complexity dynamics of the pandemic and how technology could be used to maximize privacy while slowing transmission.  Session two was an exploration of what it is actually going to be like to live through the next six months, and what, if anything we should be doing, psychologically and practically, to prepare ourselves for it. 

 

Most riveting quote of the day, perhaps more riveting because it was so paradoxical:

 

“One thing you better have in mind as you plunge into a phase transition is a clear idea of how you want the world to look like after you come through it.”

 

Most actionable suggestion of the day: 

 

Insist by every means possible that local and state election officials begin to plan (and practice in the primaries) a non-in-person voting system that will be regarded as legitimate by the general public.

 

Personally, speaking for myself, I was left with one meta-question: 

 

How much time do we devote to trying to imagine the unimaginable.  One the one hand, it seems like we have to; on the otherhand, trying to do it is so scarey that it runs the risk of bringing all thought to a stop. 

 

I know how to handle it individually:  If I start to panic, I just climb into bed, imagine that I am never going to wake up, and go to sleep.  But conversation-wise, I am not so sure.  Perhaps agree to devote small portion of the conversation to catastrophic thinking, with a clear boundary?  Assuming we can do that,  here is my suggestion for a catastrophic discussion:

 

Worse than the worst predictions for the virus acting alone, are the consequences of the virus acting in concert with a total collapse of our institututions, food production, distributution, our elections, public order, etc. (e.g., Who is going to plant and pick the crops if the borders are closed?  Draft out-of-school college students?)  Our country is run by a gerontocracy, which, being human, will try above all to protect themselves. But they will mosty fail, in any case,  because they are the most vulnerable. What if, in their vain attempt to protect themselves, they bring down the whole?   

 

Ok.  Now I am going to bed.

 

Nick

 

Nicholas Thompson

Emeritus Professor of Ethology and Psychology

Clark University

[hidden email]

https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/

 

 

From: Friam <[hidden email]> On Behalf Of Jon Zingale
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2020 12:02 PM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Outbreak Simulation

 

At home, we are discussing the effect of the virus and the effect

of social distancing on individuals that rely on soup kitchens.

What strategies can Friam produce for feeding these people

that is consistent with the social distancing strategy?

For bonus points, please justify posted strategies with a model, 

or simulation.

 

Jon

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Outbreak Simulation

thompnickson2

Frank,

 

Oh, I don’t mean THAT kind of sleep. 

 

I just mean that, if my head is full of shitty thoughts about the future, telling myself that I am not going to wake up is actually calming. 

 

It’s an instance of Thompson’s First Law: 

 

Thou shalt not worry about two mutually exclusive calamities.

 

I developed this law when I found myself sitting on my sunny front porch in New Braintree worrying, alternately, that the young elm tree growing near the porch would grow up and cast shade on the porch AND that the young elm tree growing near the porch would die of dutch elm disease. 

 

I figured that if I had nothing better to do with my mind, I should probably take a nap.

 

Nick

 

Nicholas Thompson

Emeritus Professor of Ethology and Psychology

Clark University

[hidden email]

https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/

 

 

From: Friam <[hidden email]> On Behalf Of Frank Wimberly
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2020 1:02 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Outbreak Simulation

 

Don't go to sleep, please

 

I think our institutions are more robust and durable than you do.

 

Frank

---
Frank C. Wimberly
505 670-9918
Santa Fe, NM

 

On Fri, Mar 20, 2020, 12:55 PM <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi, Y’all,

 

Just got done with the FRIAM ZOOM session, which seemed to divide into two sessions, equally interesting, but quite different.  Session one was an expert discussion of the complexity dynamics of the pandemic and how technology could be used to maximize privacy while slowing transmission.  Session two was an exploration of what it is actually going to be like to live through the next six months, and what, if anything we should be doing, psychologically and practically, to prepare ourselves for it. 

 

Most riveting quote of the day, perhaps more riveting because it was so paradoxical:

 

“One thing you better have in mind as you plunge into a phase transition is a clear idea of how you want the world to look like after you come through it.”

 

Most actionable suggestion of the day: 

 

Insist by every means possible that local and state election officials begin to plan (and practice in the primaries) a non-in-person voting system that will be regarded as legitimate by the general public.

 

Personally, speaking for myself, I was left with one meta-question: 

 

How much time do we devote to trying to imagine the unimaginable.  One the one hand, it seems like we have to; on the otherhand, trying to do it is so scarey that it runs the risk of bringing all thought to a stop. 

 

I know how to handle it individually:  If I start to panic, I just climb into bed, imagine that I am never going to wake up, and go to sleep.  But conversation-wise, I am not so sure.  Perhaps agree to devote small portion of the conversation to catastrophic thinking, with a clear boundary?  Assuming we can do that,  here is my suggestion for a catastrophic discussion:

 

Worse than the worst predictions for the virus acting alone, are the consequences of the virus acting in concert with a total collapse of our institututions, food production, distributution, our elections, public order, etc. (e.g., Who is going to plant and pick the crops if the borders are closed?  Draft out-of-school college students?)  Our country is run by a gerontocracy, which, being human, will try above all to protect themselves. But they will mosty fail, in any case,  because they are the most vulnerable. What if, in their vain attempt to protect themselves, they bring down the whole?   

 

Ok.  Now I am going to bed.

 

Nick

 

Nicholas Thompson

Emeritus Professor of Ethology and Psychology

Clark University

[hidden email]

https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/

 

 

From: Friam <[hidden email]> On Behalf Of Jon Zingale
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2020 12:02 PM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Outbreak Simulation

 

At home, we are discussing the effect of the virus and the effect

of social distancing on individuals that rely on soup kitchens.

What strategies can Friam produce for feeding these people

that is consistent with the social distancing strategy?

For bonus points, please justify posted strategies with a model, 

or simulation.

 

Jon

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove


============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Outbreak Simulation

Marcus G. Daniels
In reply to this post by Frank Wimberly-2

I thought this was kind of interesting. 

 

https://us.dantelabs.com/pages/coronavirus

 

If they were doing something like this, might be able to collect both the viral and human data from one sample:

 

https://www.illumina.com/content/dam/illumina-marketing/documents/products/appnotes/ngs-coronavirus-app-note-1270-2020-001.pdf

 

 

From: Friam <[hidden email]> on behalf of Frank Wimberly <[hidden email]>
Reply-To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <[hidden email]>
Date: Friday, March 20, 2020 at 12:02 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Outbreak Simulation

 

Don't go to sleep, please

 

I think our institutions are more robust and durable than you do.

 

Frank

---
Frank C. Wimberly
505 670-9918
Santa Fe, NM

 

On Fri, Mar 20, 2020, 12:55 PM <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi, Y’all,

 

Just got done with the FRIAM ZOOM session, which seemed to divide into two sessions, equally interesting, but quite different.  Session one was an expert discussion of the complexity dynamics of the pandemic and how technology could be used to maximize privacy while slowing transmission.  Session two was an exploration of what it is actually going to be like to live through the next six months, and what, if anything we should be doing, psychologically and practically, to prepare ourselves for it. 

 

Most riveting quote of the day, perhaps more riveting because it was so paradoxical:

 

“One thing you better have in mind as you plunge into a phase transition is a clear idea of how you want the world to look like after you come through it.”

 

Most actionable suggestion of the day: 

 

Insist by every means possible that local and state election officials begin to plan (and practice in the primaries) a non-in-person voting system that will be regarded as legitimate by the general public.

 

Personally, speaking for myself, I was left with one meta-question: 

 

How much time do we devote to trying to imagine the unimaginable.  One the one hand, it seems like we have to; on the otherhand, trying to do it is so scarey that it runs the risk of bringing all thought to a stop. 

 

I know how to handle it individually:  If I start to panic, I just climb into bed, imagine that I am never going to wake up, and go to sleep.  But conversation-wise, I am not so sure.  Perhaps agree to devote small portion of the conversation to catastrophic thinking, with a clear boundary?  Assuming we can do that,  here is my suggestion for a catastrophic discussion:

 

Worse than the worst predictions for the virus acting alone, are the consequences of the virus acting in concert with a total collapse of our institututions, food production, distributution, our elections, public order, etc. (e.g., Who is going to plant and pick the crops if the borders are closed?  Draft out-of-school college students?)  Our country is run by a gerontocracy, which, being human, will try above all to protect themselves. But they will mosty fail, in any case,  because they are the most vulnerable. What if, in their vain attempt to protect themselves, they bring down the whole?   

 

Ok.  Now I am going to bed.

 

Nick

 

Nicholas Thompson

Emeritus Professor of Ethology and Psychology

Clark University

[hidden email]

https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/

 

 

From: Friam <[hidden email]> On Behalf Of Jon Zingale
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2020 12:02 PM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Outbreak Simulation

 

At home, we are discussing the effect of the virus and the effect

of social distancing on individuals that rely on soup kitchens.

What strategies can Friam produce for feeding these people

that is consistent with the social distancing strategy?

For bonus points, please justify posted strategies with a model, 

or simulation.

 

Jon

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove


============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Outbreak Simulation

Merle Lefkoff-2
Below is information I just saw from the Center for American Progress on strategies to insure the election process can move forward.  This is in answer to Nick's (and my) concern.

Expand opportunities for people to vote from home or at quarantine locations

States should think seriously about adopting all vote-by-mail elections with vote centers or other in-person options for people who prefer or need them. States such as Colorado, Oregon, and Washington have already implemented all-mail elections with great success, and Hawaii will begin implementing all-mail voting during the 2020 elections. Another option is to adopt no-excuse absentee voting and extend deadlines for requesting absentee ballots. A handful of states have permanent absentee votinglists, whereby every registered voter who signs up receives an absentee ballot each election. As a precaution for upcoming elections, jurisdictions should automatically maila ballot to each registered voter well in advance of voting periods. Voters should be able to return their ballots by mail or by dropping their voted ballot off at conveniently located secure drop boxes or at drive-up, drop-off locations. Ballot envelopes should be self-sealing to protect the health and safety of election workers who handle absentee ballots. All absentee ballots postmarked on or before Election Day must be counted even if they are ultimately received days later due to postal service delays.



On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 1:56 PM Marcus Daniels <[hidden email]> wrote:

I thought this was kind of interesting. 

 

https://us.dantelabs.com/pages/coronavirus

 

If they were doing something like this, might be able to collect both the viral and human data from one sample:

 

https://www.illumina.com/content/dam/illumina-marketing/documents/products/appnotes/ngs-coronavirus-app-note-1270-2020-001.pdf

 

 

From: Friam <[hidden email]> on behalf of Frank Wimberly <[hidden email]>
Reply-To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <[hidden email]>
Date: Friday, March 20, 2020 at 12:02 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Outbreak Simulation

 

Don't go to sleep, please

 

I think our institutions are more robust and durable than you do.

 

Frank

---
Frank C. Wimberly
505 670-9918
Santa Fe, NM

 

On Fri, Mar 20, 2020, 12:55 PM <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi, Y’all,

 

Just got done with the FRIAM ZOOM session, which seemed to divide into two sessions, equally interesting, but quite different.  Session one was an expert discussion of the complexity dynamics of the pandemic and how technology could be used to maximize privacy while slowing transmission.  Session two was an exploration of what it is actually going to be like to live through the next six months, and what, if anything we should be doing, psychologically and practically, to prepare ourselves for it. 

 

Most riveting quote of the day, perhaps more riveting because it was so paradoxical:

 

“One thing you better have in mind as you plunge into a phase transition is a clear idea of how you want the world to look like after you come through it.”

 

Most actionable suggestion of the day: 

 

Insist by every means possible that local and state election officials begin to plan (and practice in the primaries) a non-in-person voting system that will be regarded as legitimate by the general public.

 

Personally, speaking for myself, I was left with one meta-question: 

 

How much time do we devote to trying to imagine the unimaginable.  One the one hand, it seems like we have to; on the otherhand, trying to do it is so scarey that it runs the risk of bringing all thought to a stop. 

 

I know how to handle it individually:  If I start to panic, I just climb into bed, imagine that I am never going to wake up, and go to sleep.  But conversation-wise, I am not so sure.  Perhaps agree to devote small portion of the conversation to catastrophic thinking, with a clear boundary?  Assuming we can do that,  here is my suggestion for a catastrophic discussion:

 

Worse than the worst predictions for the virus acting alone, are the consequences of the virus acting in concert with a total collapse of our institututions, food production, distributution, our elections, public order, etc. (e.g., Who is going to plant and pick the crops if the borders are closed?  Draft out-of-school college students?)  Our country is run by a gerontocracy, which, being human, will try above all to protect themselves. But they will mosty fail, in any case,  because they are the most vulnerable. What if, in their vain attempt to protect themselves, they bring down the whole?   

 

Ok.  Now I am going to bed.

 

Nick

 

Nicholas Thompson

Emeritus Professor of Ethology and Psychology

Clark University

[hidden email]

https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/

 

 

From: Friam <[hidden email]> On Behalf Of Jon Zingale
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2020 12:02 PM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Outbreak Simulation

 

At home, we are discussing the effect of the virus and the effect

of social distancing on individuals that rely on soup kitchens.

What strategies can Friam produce for feeding these people

that is consistent with the social distancing strategy?

For bonus points, please justify posted strategies with a model, 

or simulation.

 

Jon

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove


--
Merle Lefkoff, Ph.D.
President, Center for Emergent Diplomacy
emergentdiplomacy.org
Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
[hidden email]
mobile:  (303) 859-5609
skype:  merle.lelfkoff2
twitter: @Merle_Lefkoff

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Outbreak Simulation

Gillian Densmore
fuck "social distancing" this "shelter in place" shit has the assumption that we'll pull a rabbit out of our ass in 2-3 months tops. When in the history of medicine has that ever happend? I don't want people hurt by it.  Drumming up more hysteria than the news already does isn't helping matters either.


On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 5:01 PM Merle Lefkoff <[hidden email]> wrote:
Below is information I just saw from the Center for American Progress on strategies to insure the election process can move forward.  This is in answer to Nick's (and my) concern.

Expand opportunities for people to vote from home or at quarantine locations

States should think seriously about adopting all vote-by-mail elections with vote centers or other in-person options for people who prefer or need them. States such as Colorado, Oregon, and Washington have already implemented all-mail elections with great success, and Hawaii will begin implementing all-mail voting during the 2020 elections. Another option is to adopt no-excuse absentee voting and extend deadlines for requesting absentee ballots. A handful of states have permanent absentee votinglists, whereby every registered voter who signs up receives an absentee ballot each election. As a precaution for upcoming elections, jurisdictions should automatically maila ballot to each registered voter well in advance of voting periods. Voters should be able to return their ballots by mail or by dropping their voted ballot off at conveniently located secure drop boxes or at drive-up, drop-off locations. Ballot envelopes should be self-sealing to protect the health and safety of election workers who handle absentee ballots. All absentee ballots postmarked on or before Election Day must be counted even if they are ultimately received days later due to postal service delays.



On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 1:56 PM Marcus Daniels <[hidden email]> wrote:

I thought this was kind of interesting. 

 

https://us.dantelabs.com/pages/coronavirus

 

If they were doing something like this, might be able to collect both the viral and human data from one sample:

 

https://www.illumina.com/content/dam/illumina-marketing/documents/products/appnotes/ngs-coronavirus-app-note-1270-2020-001.pdf

 

 

From: Friam <[hidden email]> on behalf of Frank Wimberly <[hidden email]>
Reply-To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <[hidden email]>
Date: Friday, March 20, 2020 at 12:02 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Outbreak Simulation

 

Don't go to sleep, please

 

I think our institutions are more robust and durable than you do.

 

Frank

---
Frank C. Wimberly
505 670-9918
Santa Fe, NM

 

On Fri, Mar 20, 2020, 12:55 PM <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi, Y’all,

 

Just got done with the FRIAM ZOOM session, which seemed to divide into two sessions, equally interesting, but quite different.  Session one was an expert discussion of the complexity dynamics of the pandemic and how technology could be used to maximize privacy while slowing transmission.  Session two was an exploration of what it is actually going to be like to live through the next six months, and what, if anything we should be doing, psychologically and practically, to prepare ourselves for it. 

 

Most riveting quote of the day, perhaps more riveting because it was so paradoxical:

 

“One thing you better have in mind as you plunge into a phase transition is a clear idea of how you want the world to look like after you come through it.”

 

Most actionable suggestion of the day: 

 

Insist by every means possible that local and state election officials begin to plan (and practice in the primaries) a non-in-person voting system that will be regarded as legitimate by the general public.

 

Personally, speaking for myself, I was left with one meta-question: 

 

How much time do we devote to trying to imagine the unimaginable.  One the one hand, it seems like we have to; on the otherhand, trying to do it is so scarey that it runs the risk of bringing all thought to a stop. 

 

I know how to handle it individually:  If I start to panic, I just climb into bed, imagine that I am never going to wake up, and go to sleep.  But conversation-wise, I am not so sure.  Perhaps agree to devote small portion of the conversation to catastrophic thinking, with a clear boundary?  Assuming we can do that,  here is my suggestion for a catastrophic discussion:

 

Worse than the worst predictions for the virus acting alone, are the consequences of the virus acting in concert with a total collapse of our institututions, food production, distributution, our elections, public order, etc. (e.g., Who is going to plant and pick the crops if the borders are closed?  Draft out-of-school college students?)  Our country is run by a gerontocracy, which, being human, will try above all to protect themselves. But they will mosty fail, in any case,  because they are the most vulnerable. What if, in their vain attempt to protect themselves, they bring down the whole?   

 

Ok.  Now I am going to bed.

 

Nick

 

Nicholas Thompson

Emeritus Professor of Ethology and Psychology

Clark University

[hidden email]

https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/

 

 

From: Friam <[hidden email]> On Behalf Of Jon Zingale
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2020 12:02 PM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Outbreak Simulation

 

At home, we are discussing the effect of the virus and the effect

of social distancing on individuals that rely on soup kitchens.

What strategies can Friam produce for feeding these people

that is consistent with the social distancing strategy?

For bonus points, please justify posted strategies with a model, 

or simulation.

 

Jon

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove


--
Merle Lefkoff, Ph.D.
President, Center for Emergent Diplomacy
emergentdiplomacy.org
Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
[hidden email]
mobile:  (303) 859-5609
skype:  merle.lelfkoff2
twitter: @Merle_Lefkoff
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Outbreak Simulation

Marcus G. Daniels

It’s not about stalling for a treatment, it is to pace the hospital arrivals.

On Mar 20, 2020, at 10:44 PM, Gillian Densmore <[hidden email]> wrote:


fuck "social distancing" this "shelter in place" shit has the assumption that we'll pull a rabbit out of our ass in 2-3 months tops. When in the history of medicine has that ever happend? I don't want people hurt by it.  Drumming up more hysteria than the news already does isn't helping matters either.


On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 5:01 PM Merle Lefkoff <[hidden email]> wrote:
Below is information I just saw from the Center for American Progress on strategies to insure the election process can move forward.  This is in answer to Nick's (and my) concern.

Expand opportunities for people to vote from home or at quarantine locations

States should think seriously about adopting all vote-by-mail elections with vote centers or other in-person options for people who prefer or need them. States such as Colorado, Oregon, and Washington have already implemented all-mail elections with great success, and Hawaii will begin implementing all-mail voting during the 2020 elections. Another option is to adopt no-excuse absentee voting and extend deadlines for requesting absentee ballots. A handful of states have permanent absentee votinglists, whereby every registered voter who signs up receives an absentee ballot each election. As a precaution for upcoming elections, jurisdictions should automatically maila ballot to each registered voter well in advance of voting periods. Voters should be able to return their ballots by mail or by dropping their voted ballot off at conveniently located secure drop boxes or at drive-up, drop-off locations. Ballot envelopes should be self-sealing to protect the health and safety of election workers who handle absentee ballots. All absentee ballots postmarked on or before Election Day must be counted even if they are ultimately received days later due to postal service delays.



On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 1:56 PM Marcus Daniels <[hidden email]> wrote:

I thought this was kind of interesting. 

 

https://us.dantelabs.com/pages/coronavirus

 

If they were doing something like this, might be able to collect both the viral and human data from one sample:

 

https://www.illumina.com/content/dam/illumina-marketing/documents/products/appnotes/ngs-coronavirus-app-note-1270-2020-001.pdf

 

 

From: Friam <[hidden email]> on behalf of Frank Wimberly <[hidden email]>
Reply-To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <[hidden email]>
Date: Friday, March 20, 2020 at 12:02 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Outbreak Simulation

 

Don't go to sleep, please

 

I think our institutions are more robust and durable than you do.

 

Frank

---
Frank C. Wimberly
505 670-9918
Santa Fe, NM

 

On Fri, Mar 20, 2020, 12:55 PM <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi, Y’all,

 

Just got done with the FRIAM ZOOM session, which seemed to divide into two sessions, equally interesting, but quite different.  Session one was an expert discussion of the complexity dynamics of the pandemic and how technology could be used to maximize privacy while slowing transmission.  Session two was an exploration of what it is actually going to be like to live through the next six months, and what, if anything we should be doing, psychologically and practically, to prepare ourselves for it. 

 

Most riveting quote of the day, perhaps more riveting because it was so paradoxical:

 

“One thing you better have in mind as you plunge into a phase transition is a clear idea of how you want the world to look like after you come through it.”

 

Most actionable suggestion of the day: 

 

Insist by every means possible that local and state election officials begin to plan (and practice in the primaries) a non-in-person voting system that will be regarded as legitimate by the general public.

 

Personally, speaking for myself, I was left with one meta-question: 

 

How much time do we devote to trying to imagine the unimaginable.  One the one hand, it seems like we have to; on the otherhand, trying to do it is so scarey that it runs the risk of bringing all thought to a stop. 

 

I know how to handle it individually:  If I start to panic, I just climb into bed, imagine that I am never going to wake up, and go to sleep.  But conversation-wise, I am not so sure.  Perhaps agree to devote small portion of the conversation to catastrophic thinking, with a clear boundary?  Assuming we can do that,  here is my suggestion for a catastrophic discussion:

 

Worse than the worst predictions for the virus acting alone, are the consequences of the virus acting in concert with a total collapse of our institututions, food production, distributution, our elections, public order, etc. (e.g., Who is going to plant and pick the crops if the borders are closed?  Draft out-of-school college students?)  Our country is run by a gerontocracy, which, being human, will try above all to protect themselves. But they will mosty fail, in any case,  because they are the most vulnerable. What if, in their vain attempt to protect themselves, they bring down the whole?   

 

Ok.  Now I am going to bed.

 

Nick

 

Nicholas Thompson

Emeritus Professor of Ethology and Psychology

Clark University

[hidden email]

https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/

 

 

From: Friam <[hidden email]> On Behalf Of Jon Zingale
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2020 12:02 PM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Outbreak Simulation

 

At home, we are discussing the effect of the virus and the effect

of social distancing on individuals that rely on soup kitchens.

What strategies can Friam produce for feeding these people

that is consistent with the social distancing strategy?

For bonus points, please justify posted strategies with a model, 

or simulation.

 

Jon

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove


--
Merle Lefkoff, Ph.D.
President, Center for Emergent Diplomacy
emergentdiplomacy.org
Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
[hidden email]
mobile:  (303) 859-5609
skype:  merle.lelfkoff2
twitter: @Merle_Lefkoff
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Outbreak Simulation

Gillian Densmore
Mmm. Well. That is true our medical system is a fragile mess as is. My concern that I realize is a pretty unpopular opinion is a total lack of perspective. One side of that is you have a higher risk getting hit by a car than not making it through this, what ever it is.   I gather the real issue isn't that, it's people who for what ever reason don't quite stay at some dry caugh cold, nasty flue like stage but  then also get just nastily congested lungs that need sterrioids and oxygen. 
And all of that on top of a surreal amount of hyping up the negative and turning it into a WWF style match from media. "PANDEMIC 2000 (PANDEMIC, DEMIC EPIDEMIC MOOONSTER DEMIC RACING 2020!!! ALL THE...SAME SOUND BYTES NOW WITH MORE COWBELL!!!"  I don't know if that'll read well in text.  Anyone that was a kid of the 80s(us) and they'd have this truck rally adds on Saturdays and Sometimes Sundays. I imagine how that'd sound with this Max-Hendroomy thing of turning this epidemic into something like that. As if it's a 80s WWF wrestling match

But then also the scientists I don't think are saying lock yourself inside.(yet) Pretty disturbing to call 'Eh well try to avoid people' as Social Distancing.

On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 11:49 PM Marcus Daniels <[hidden email]> wrote:

It’s not about stalling for a treatment, it is to pace the hospital arrivals.

On Mar 20, 2020, at 10:44 PM, Gillian Densmore <[hidden email]> wrote:


fuck "social distancing" this "shelter in place" shit has the assumption that we'll pull a rabbit out of our ass in 2-3 months tops. When in the history of medicine has that ever happend? I don't want people hurt by it.  Drumming up more hysteria than the news already does isn't helping matters either.


On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 5:01 PM Merle Lefkoff <[hidden email]> wrote:
Below is information I just saw from the Center for American Progress on strategies to insure the election process can move forward.  This is in answer to Nick's (and my) concern.

Expand opportunities for people to vote from home or at quarantine locations

States should think seriously about adopting all vote-by-mail elections with vote centers or other in-person options for people who prefer or need them. States such as Colorado, Oregon, and Washington have already implemented all-mail elections with great success, and Hawaii will begin implementing all-mail voting during the 2020 elections. Another option is to adopt no-excuse absentee voting and extend deadlines for requesting absentee ballots. A handful of states have permanent absentee votinglists, whereby every registered voter who signs up receives an absentee ballot each election. As a precaution for upcoming elections, jurisdictions should automatically maila ballot to each registered voter well in advance of voting periods. Voters should be able to return their ballots by mail or by dropping their voted ballot off at conveniently located secure drop boxes or at drive-up, drop-off locations. Ballot envelopes should be self-sealing to protect the health and safety of election workers who handle absentee ballots. All absentee ballots postmarked on or before Election Day must be counted even if they are ultimately received days later due to postal service delays.



On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 1:56 PM Marcus Daniels <[hidden email]> wrote:

I thought this was kind of interesting. 

 

https://us.dantelabs.com/pages/coronavirus

 

If they were doing something like this, might be able to collect both the viral and human data from one sample:

 

https://www.illumina.com/content/dam/illumina-marketing/documents/products/appnotes/ngs-coronavirus-app-note-1270-2020-001.pdf

 

 

From: Friam <[hidden email]> on behalf of Frank Wimberly <[hidden email]>
Reply-To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <[hidden email]>
Date: Friday, March 20, 2020 at 12:02 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Outbreak Simulation

 

Don't go to sleep, please

 

I think our institutions are more robust and durable than you do.

 

Frank

---
Frank C. Wimberly
505 670-9918
Santa Fe, NM

 

On Fri, Mar 20, 2020, 12:55 PM <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi, Y’all,

 

Just got done with the FRIAM ZOOM session, which seemed to divide into two sessions, equally interesting, but quite different.  Session one was an expert discussion of the complexity dynamics of the pandemic and how technology could be used to maximize privacy while slowing transmission.  Session two was an exploration of what it is actually going to be like to live through the next six months, and what, if anything we should be doing, psychologically and practically, to prepare ourselves for it. 

 

Most riveting quote of the day, perhaps more riveting because it was so paradoxical:

 

“One thing you better have in mind as you plunge into a phase transition is a clear idea of how you want the world to look like after you come through it.”

 

Most actionable suggestion of the day: 

 

Insist by every means possible that local and state election officials begin to plan (and practice in the primaries) a non-in-person voting system that will be regarded as legitimate by the general public.

 

Personally, speaking for myself, I was left with one meta-question: 

 

How much time do we devote to trying to imagine the unimaginable.  One the one hand, it seems like we have to; on the otherhand, trying to do it is so scarey that it runs the risk of bringing all thought to a stop. 

 

I know how to handle it individually:  If I start to panic, I just climb into bed, imagine that I am never going to wake up, and go to sleep.  But conversation-wise, I am not so sure.  Perhaps agree to devote small portion of the conversation to catastrophic thinking, with a clear boundary?  Assuming we can do that,  here is my suggestion for a catastrophic discussion:

 

Worse than the worst predictions for the virus acting alone, are the consequences of the virus acting in concert with a total collapse of our institututions, food production, distributution, our elections, public order, etc. (e.g., Who is going to plant and pick the crops if the borders are closed?  Draft out-of-school college students?)  Our country is run by a gerontocracy, which, being human, will try above all to protect themselves. But they will mosty fail, in any case,  because they are the most vulnerable. What if, in their vain attempt to protect themselves, they bring down the whole?   

 

Ok.  Now I am going to bed.

 

Nick

 

Nicholas Thompson

Emeritus Professor of Ethology and Psychology

Clark University

[hidden email]

https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/

 

 

From: Friam <[hidden email]> On Behalf Of Jon Zingale
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2020 12:02 PM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Outbreak Simulation

 

At home, we are discussing the effect of the virus and the effect

of social distancing on individuals that rely on soup kitchens.

What strategies can Friam produce for feeding these people

that is consistent with the social distancing strategy?

For bonus points, please justify posted strategies with a model, 

or simulation.

 

Jon

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove


--
Merle Lefkoff, Ph.D.
President, Center for Emergent Diplomacy
emergentdiplomacy.org
Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
[hidden email]
mobile:  (303) 859-5609
skype:  merle.lelfkoff2
twitter: @Merle_Lefkoff
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Outbreak Simulation

Roger Critchlow-2

On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 8:54 AM Gillian Densmore <[hidden email]> wrote:
Mmm. Well. That is true our medical system is a fragile mess as is. My concern that I realize is a pretty unpopular opinion is a total lack of perspective. One side of that is you have a higher risk getting hit by a car than not making it through this, what ever it is.   I gather the real issue isn't that, it's people who for what ever reason don't quite stay at some dry caugh cold, nasty flue like stage but  then also get just nastily congested lungs that need sterrioids and oxygen. 
And all of that on top of a surreal amount of hyping up the negative and turning it into a WWF style match from media. "PANDEMIC 2000 (PANDEMIC, DEMIC EPIDEMIC MOOONSTER DEMIC RACING 2020!!! ALL THE...SAME SOUND BYTES NOW WITH MORE COWBELL!!!"  I don't know if that'll read well in text.  Anyone that was a kid of the 80s(us) and they'd have this truck rally adds on Saturdays and Sometimes Sundays. I imagine how that'd sound with this Max-Hendroomy thing of turning this epidemic into something like that. As if it's a 80s WWF wrestling match

But then also the scientists I don't think are saying lock yourself inside.(yet) Pretty disturbing to call 'Eh well try to avoid people' as Social Distancing.

On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 11:49 PM Marcus Daniels <[hidden email]> wrote:

It’s not about stalling for a treatment, it is to pace the hospital arrivals.

On Mar 20, 2020, at 10:44 PM, Gillian Densmore <[hidden email]> wrote:


fuck "social distancing" this "shelter in place" shit has the assumption that we'll pull a rabbit out of our ass in 2-3 months tops. When in the history of medicine has that ever happend? I don't want people hurt by it.  Drumming up more hysteria than the news already does isn't helping matters either.


On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 5:01 PM Merle Lefkoff <[hidden email]> wrote:
Below is information I just saw from the Center for American Progress on strategies to insure the election process can move forward.  This is in answer to Nick's (and my) concern.

Expand opportunities for people to vote from home or at quarantine locations

States should think seriously about adopting all vote-by-mail elections with vote centers or other in-person options for people who prefer or need them. States such as Colorado, Oregon, and Washington have already implemented all-mail elections with great success, and Hawaii will begin implementing all-mail voting during the 2020 elections. Another option is to adopt no-excuse absentee voting and extend deadlines for requesting absentee ballots. A handful of states have permanent absentee votinglists, whereby every registered voter who signs up receives an absentee ballot each election. As a precaution for upcoming elections, jurisdictions should automatically maila ballot to each registered voter well in advance of voting periods. Voters should be able to return their ballots by mail or by dropping their voted ballot off at conveniently located secure drop boxes or at drive-up, drop-off locations. Ballot envelopes should be self-sealing to protect the health and safety of election workers who handle absentee ballots. All absentee ballots postmarked on or before Election Day must be counted even if they are ultimately received days later due to postal service delays.



On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 1:56 PM Marcus Daniels <[hidden email]> wrote:

I thought this was kind of interesting. 

 

https://us.dantelabs.com/pages/coronavirus

 

If they were doing something like this, might be able to collect both the viral and human data from one sample:

 

https://www.illumina.com/content/dam/illumina-marketing/documents/products/appnotes/ngs-coronavirus-app-note-1270-2020-001.pdf

 

 

From: Friam <[hidden email]> on behalf of Frank Wimberly <[hidden email]>
Reply-To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <[hidden email]>
Date: Friday, March 20, 2020 at 12:02 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Outbreak Simulation

 

Don't go to sleep, please

 

I think our institutions are more robust and durable than you do.

 

Frank

---
Frank C. Wimberly
505 670-9918
Santa Fe, NM

 

On Fri, Mar 20, 2020, 12:55 PM <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi, Y’all,

 

Just got done with the FRIAM ZOOM session, which seemed to divide into two sessions, equally interesting, but quite different.  Session one was an expert discussion of the complexity dynamics of the pandemic and how technology could be used to maximize privacy while slowing transmission.  Session two was an exploration of what it is actually going to be like to live through the next six months, and what, if anything we should be doing, psychologically and practically, to prepare ourselves for it. 

 

Most riveting quote of the day, perhaps more riveting because it was so paradoxical:

 

“One thing you better have in mind as you plunge into a phase transition is a clear idea of how you want the world to look like after you come through it.”

 

Most actionable suggestion of the day: 

 

Insist by every means possible that local and state election officials begin to plan (and practice in the primaries) a non-in-person voting system that will be regarded as legitimate by the general public.

 

Personally, speaking for myself, I was left with one meta-question: 

 

How much time do we devote to trying to imagine the unimaginable.  One the one hand, it seems like we have to; on the otherhand, trying to do it is so scarey that it runs the risk of bringing all thought to a stop. 

 

I know how to handle it individually:  If I start to panic, I just climb into bed, imagine that I am never going to wake up, and go to sleep.  But conversation-wise, I am not so sure.  Perhaps agree to devote small portion of the conversation to catastrophic thinking, with a clear boundary?  Assuming we can do that,  here is my suggestion for a catastrophic discussion:

 

Worse than the worst predictions for the virus acting alone, are the consequences of the virus acting in concert with a total collapse of our institututions, food production, distributution, our elections, public order, etc. (e.g., Who is going to plant and pick the crops if the borders are closed?  Draft out-of-school college students?)  Our country is run by a gerontocracy, which, being human, will try above all to protect themselves. But they will mosty fail, in any case,  because they are the most vulnerable. What if, in their vain attempt to protect themselves, they bring down the whole?   

 

Ok.  Now I am going to bed.

 

Nick

 

Nicholas Thompson

Emeritus Professor of Ethology and Psychology

Clark University

[hidden email]

https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/

 

 

From: Friam <[hidden email]> On Behalf Of Jon Zingale
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2020 12:02 PM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Outbreak Simulation

 

At home, we are discussing the effect of the virus and the effect

of social distancing on individuals that rely on soup kitchens.

What strategies can Friam produce for feeding these people

that is consistent with the social distancing strategy?

For bonus points, please justify posted strategies with a model, 

or simulation.

 

Jon

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove


--
Merle Lefkoff, Ph.D.
President, Center for Emergent Diplomacy
emergentdiplomacy.org
Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
[hidden email]
mobile:  (303) 859-5609
skype:  merle.lelfkoff2
twitter: @Merle_Lefkoff
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Outbreak Simulation

Marcus G. Daniels
In reply to this post by Gillian Densmore
Gillian writes:

"One side of that is you have a higher risk getting hit by a car than not making it through this, what ever it is. "

In 2018 in Italy, there were 3,325 fatalities from road accidents.[1]   There have been 4,032 fatalities from COVID-19 so far.   The governor of California announced that 56% of the state could contract the virus.[2]  Extrapolating that to the whole country, an uncontrolled outbreak would kill about 1.8 million people at a 1% fatality rate.   There were 33,654 road fatalities in the United States in 2018.
Stay at home.

Marcus




From: Friam <[hidden email]> on behalf of Gillian Densmore <[hidden email]>
Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2020 6:53 AM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Outbreak Simulation
 
Mmm. Well. That is true our medical system is a fragile mess as is. My concern that I realize is a pretty unpopular opinion is a total lack of perspective. One side of that is you have a higher risk getting hit by a car than not making it through this, what ever it is.   I gather the real issue isn't that, it's people who for what ever reason don't quite stay at some dry caugh cold, nasty flue like stage but  then also get just nastily congested lungs that need sterrioids and oxygen. 
And all of that on top of a surreal amount of hyping up the negative and turning it into a WWF style match from media. "PANDEMIC 2000 (PANDEMIC, DEMIC EPIDEMIC MOOONSTER DEMIC RACING 2020!!! ALL THE...SAME SOUND BYTES NOW WITH MORE COWBELL!!!"  I don't know if that'll read well in text.  Anyone that was a kid of the 80s(us) and they'd have this truck rally adds on Saturdays and Sometimes Sundays. I imagine how that'd sound with this Max-Hendroomy thing of turning this epidemic into something like that. As if it's a 80s WWF wrestling match

But then also the scientists I don't think are saying lock yourself inside.(yet) Pretty disturbing to call 'Eh well try to avoid people' as Social Distancing.

On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 11:49 PM Marcus Daniels <[hidden email]> wrote:

It’s not about stalling for a treatment, it is to pace the hospital arrivals.

On Mar 20, 2020, at 10:44 PM, Gillian Densmore <[hidden email]> wrote:


fuck "social distancing" this "shelter in place" shit has the assumption that we'll pull a rabbit out of our ass in 2-3 months tops. When in the history of medicine has that ever happend? I don't want people hurt by it.  Drumming up more hysteria than the news already does isn't helping matters either.


On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 5:01 PM Merle Lefkoff <[hidden email]> wrote:
Below is information I just saw from the Center for American Progress on strategies to insure the election process can move forward.  This is in answer to Nick's (and my) concern.

Expand opportunities for people to vote from home or at quarantine locations

States should think seriously about adopting all vote-by-mail elections with vote centers or other in-person options for people who prefer or need them. States such as Colorado, Oregon, and Washington have already implemented all-mail elections with great success, and Hawaii will begin implementing all-mail voting during the 2020 elections. Another option is to adopt no-excuse absentee voting and extend deadlines for requesting absentee ballots. A handful of states have permanent absentee votinglists, whereby every registered voter who signs up receives an absentee ballot each election. As a precaution for upcoming elections, jurisdictions should automatically maila ballot to each registered voter well in advance of voting periods. Voters should be able to return their ballots by mail or by dropping their voted ballot off at conveniently located secure drop boxes or at drive-up, drop-off locations. Ballot envelopes should be self-sealing to protect the health and safety of election workers who handle absentee ballots. All absentee ballots postmarked on or before Election Day must be counted even if they are ultimately received days later due to postal service delays.



On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 1:56 PM Marcus Daniels <[hidden email]> wrote:

I thought this was kind of interesting. 

 

https://us.dantelabs.com/pages/coronavirus

 

If they were doing something like this, might be able to collect both the viral and human data from one sample:

 

https://www.illumina.com/content/dam/illumina-marketing/documents/products/appnotes/ngs-coronavirus-app-note-1270-2020-001.pdf

 

 

From: Friam <[hidden email]> on behalf of Frank Wimberly <[hidden email]>
Reply-To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <[hidden email]>
Date: Friday, March 20, 2020 at 12:02 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Outbreak Simulation

 

Don't go to sleep, please

 

I think our institutions are more robust and durable than you do.

 

Frank

---
Frank C. Wimberly
505 670-9918
Santa Fe, NM

 

On Fri, Mar 20, 2020, 12:55 PM <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi, Y’all,

 

Just got done with the FRIAM ZOOM session, which seemed to divide into two sessions, equally interesting, but quite different.  Session one was an expert discussion of the complexity dynamics of the pandemic and how technology could be used to maximize privacy while slowing transmission.  Session two was an exploration of what it is actually going to be like to live through the next six months, and what, if anything we should be doing, psychologically and practically, to prepare ourselves for it. 

 

Most riveting quote of the day, perhaps more riveting because it was so paradoxical:

 

“One thing you better have in mind as you plunge into a phase transition is a clear idea of how you want the world to look like after you come through it.”

 

Most actionable suggestion of the day: 

 

Insist by every means possible that local and state election officials begin to plan (and practice in the primaries) a non-in-person voting system that will be regarded as legitimate by the general public.

 

Personally, speaking for myself, I was left with one meta-question: 

 

How much time do we devote to trying to imagine the unimaginable.  One the one hand, it seems like we have to; on the otherhand, trying to do it is so scarey that it runs the risk of bringing all thought to a stop. 

 

I know how to handle it individually:  If I start to panic, I just climb into bed, imagine that I am never going to wake up, and go to sleep.  But conversation-wise, I am not so sure.  Perhaps agree to devote small portion of the conversation to catastrophic thinking, with a clear boundary?  Assuming we can do that,  here is my suggestion for a catastrophic discussion:

 

Worse than the worst predictions for the virus acting alone, are the consequences of the virus acting in concert with a total collapse of our institututions, food production, distributution, our elections, public order, etc. (e.g., Who is going to plant and pick the crops if the borders are closed?  Draft out-of-school college students?)  Our country is run by a gerontocracy, which, being human, will try above all to protect themselves. But they will mosty fail, in any case,  because they are the most vulnerable. What if, in their vain attempt to protect themselves, they bring down the whole?   

 

Ok.  Now I am going to bed.

 

Nick

 

Nicholas Thompson

Emeritus Professor of Ethology and Psychology

Clark University

[hidden email]

https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/

 

 

From: Friam <[hidden email]> On Behalf Of Jon Zingale
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2020 12:02 PM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Outbreak Simulation

 

At home, we are discussing the effect of the virus and the effect

of social distancing on individuals that rely on soup kitchens.

What strategies can Friam produce for feeding these people

that is consistent with the social distancing strategy?

For bonus points, please justify posted strategies with a model, 

or simulation.

 

Jon

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove


--
Merle Lefkoff, Ph.D.
President, Center for Emergent Diplomacy
emergentdiplomacy.org
Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
[hidden email]
mobile:  (303) 859-5609
skype:  merle.lelfkoff2
twitter: @Merle_Lefkoff
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Outbreak Simulation

Steve Smith

While I'm sympathetic with the idea that the relative magnitude of this threat *might* be on the same order as "hit by a car", and that to the extent that panic behaviour has it's own risks and unintended consequences, I think  there is a qualitative issue at hand as well.


It is as if the number of cars on the road just doubled and some of the drivers come from the UK right-hand-driving sphere such that while the risk of death has only roughly *doubled*, our instincts are not tuned to where to look (left/right) when we step out into the street.  Our intuitions just aren't well tuned to this.


Unfortunately, quantitative numbers are exponential not linear, so even if you could compare it to "hit by a car",  it doesn't calibrate for crazy fluctuations in traffic.   Like being the Frog in Frogger right after a level-up.


This just out from James Tamplin (founder of Firebase), providing a slightly finer grain model to refer to and build from: https://covidactnow.org/ .  It is worthwhile to read the assumptions that this model uses.  It is all transparent and implemented as spreadsheets that can be downloaded and tweaked if you choose.   It is strictly statistical and aggregated at the State level, but does not take into account variations in population density and personal encounters (this is a case where the style of mixing implied by suburban car-culture may be a lot safer than urban pedestrian-culture).


Mary and I have had to calibrate our sensitivity to risk several times during this episode.

  1. We were on our way to a long overdue visit to my mother (91) in her assisted living where most everyone else there is older and more at-risk even than she is.   Her TV has only one channel (Fox) and she was reluctant (2 weeks ago) to believe that my daughter in Portland with an 18 month old she hasn't met yet, really shouldn't risk gathering virus particles through 3 airports and 2 planes to visit her.    After they waved off, we planned to come ahead as a consolation prize, as did my other daughter and her 8 year old (we were both driving, avoiding high-risk virus-gathering opportunities).   Even though we were already on the road when things really started looking bad (over a week ago), I was pretty sure we shouldn't even risk *our* bringing her anything from here or our travels, but was reluctant to tell her that yet.  2 days in my daughter was leaving Denver with two kids promised a Spring Break and we negotiated a back-country tour of the 4 corners area, meeting up with them, and not risk delivering virus particles to their great/grandmother and her friends.    
  2. After listening to towns, counties, parks, states shut their doors on our heels as we traveled through, we were feeling a little "guilty" by the time we arrived back on our fairly isolated home(stead) 20 minutes outside of Santa Fe.   Our normal life involves at most 3 trips to *some* town, and even then very limited interaction with others usually.  Dropping back to 1 very careful grocery run a week is not that big of a step for us.
  3. We now have other semi-rural friends/neighbors trying to negotiate visits with us which we are trying to sort through.   In our early 60s, we are marginally at higher risk than many, but most of those friends/neighbors include at least 1 member in their late 70s or even 80s.   Their level of self-concern varies wildly from radical germophobe to devil-may-care libertarians.    I could mix with any *one* of these sub-cliques comfortably if I didn't feel like I was risking cross-contamination between them.    The highest-risk-taking groups aren't too high-risk for us, nor are the lowest-risk-takers too low, but I"m unwilling to accidentally bridge the two.
  4. Our 5 (collectively) adult children have roughly 5 different circumstances and sensibilities about this pandemic.  One is a virologist who is already engaged in working directly on the problem.  Two others are owners of small businesses which are direct personal service (crossfit gym and art framing-shop) and one is a child social worker who supervises dozens of people whose everyday job is to do home visits with families in crisis... this quarantine situation puts some of those families at yet higher risk in several ways.   The fifth just got the diagnosis (this week) that his wife very likely has a cancer that will need/deserve surgery AND chemo/rad ASAP.      Juggling our advice/support across this diversity is a challenge, though a tiny fraction I think of what *many* have to face.
  5. Mary is intrinsically more concerned about her personal health than I tend to be (about my own) which means she is moderately more healthy but at the same time more fragile in her concerns.   She took two weeks to recover from a COVID_like flu with bacterial (sinus) complications just a month ago... had that hit a week or two later, we would have had to respond *as-if* it were COVID19.   She did give over to a doc visit who threw antibiotics at her, and the secondary sinus (with fever) cleared up in days.   I have no idea how that would have unfolded under the current shadows.
  6. I just glanced through Barry's post just now and was reminded of the issue of Asymptomatic transmission vs what I prefer to think of as Presymptomatic.   Presymptomatic includes some coughing and sneezing that you don't attribute to an illness (yet)...  if you are an annual allergy sufferer, for example, it could be easy to assume the increased sneezing is an allergy (and it might be!) right up until you get hit with a fever or discover someone in your social network is symptomatic/positive.

Blah blah,

 - Steve

Gillian writes:

"One side of that is you have a higher risk getting hit by a car than not making it through this, what ever it is. "

In 2018 in Italy, there were 3,325 fatalities from road accidents.[1]   There have been 4,032 fatalities from COVID-19 so far.   The governor of California announced that 56% of the state could contract the virus.[2]  Extrapolating that to the whole country, an uncontrolled outbreak would kill about 1.8 million people at a 1% fatality rate.   There were 33,654 road fatalities in the United States in 2018.
Stay at home.

Marcus




From: Friam [hidden email] on behalf of Gillian Densmore [hidden email]
Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2020 6:53 AM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group [hidden email]
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Outbreak Simulation
 
Mmm. Well. That is true our medical system is a fragile mess as is. My concern that I realize is a pretty unpopular opinion is a total lack of perspective. One side of that is you have a higher risk getting hit by a car than not making it through this, what ever it is.   I gather the real issue isn't that, it's people who for what ever reason don't quite stay at some dry caugh cold, nasty flue like stage but  then also get just nastily congested lungs that need sterrioids and oxygen. 
And all of that on top of a surreal amount of hyping up the negative and turning it into a WWF style match from media. "PANDEMIC 2000 (PANDEMIC, DEMIC EPIDEMIC MOOONSTER DEMIC RACING 2020!!! ALL THE...SAME SOUND BYTES NOW WITH MORE COWBELL!!!"  I don't know if that'll read well in text.  Anyone that was a kid of the 80s(us) and they'd have this truck rally adds on Saturdays and Sometimes Sundays. I imagine how that'd sound with this Max-Hendroomy thing of turning this epidemic into something like that. As if it's a 80s WWF wrestling match

But then also the scientists I don't think are saying lock yourself inside.(yet) Pretty disturbing to call 'Eh well try to avoid people' as Social Distancing.

On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 11:49 PM Marcus Daniels <[hidden email]> wrote:

It’s not about stalling for a treatment, it is to pace the hospital arrivals.

On Mar 20, 2020, at 10:44 PM, Gillian Densmore <[hidden email]> wrote:


fuck "social distancing" this "shelter in place" shit has the assumption that we'll pull a rabbit out of our ass in 2-3 months tops. When in the history of medicine has that ever happend? I don't want people hurt by it.  Drumming up more hysteria than the news already does isn't helping matters either.


On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 5:01 PM Merle Lefkoff <[hidden email]> wrote:
Below is information I just saw from the Center for American Progress on strategies to insure the election process can move forward.  This is in answer to Nick's (and my) concern.

Expand opportunities for people to vote from home or at quarantine locations

States should think seriously about adopting all vote-by-mail elections with vote centers or other in-person options for people who prefer or need them. States such as Colorado, Oregon, and Washington have already implemented all-mail elections with great success, and Hawaii will begin implementing all-mail voting during the 2020 elections. Another option is to adopt no-excuse absentee voting and extend deadlines for requesting absentee ballots. A handful of states have permanent absentee votinglists, whereby every registered voter who signs up receives an absentee ballot each election. As a precaution for upcoming elections, jurisdictions should automatically maila ballot to each registered voter well in advance of voting periods. Voters should be able to return their ballots by mail or by dropping their voted ballot off at conveniently located secure drop boxes or at drive-up, drop-off locations. Ballot envelopes should be self-sealing to protect the health and safety of election workers who handle absentee ballots. All absentee ballots postmarked on or before Election Day must be counted even if they are ultimately received days later due to postal service delays.



On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 1:56 PM Marcus Daniels <[hidden email]> wrote:

I thought this was kind of interesting. 

 

https://us.dantelabs.com/pages/coronavirus

 

If they were doing something like this, might be able to collect both the viral and human data from one sample:

 

https://www.illumina.com/content/dam/illumina-marketing/documents/products/appnotes/ngs-coronavirus-app-note-1270-2020-001.pdf

 

 

From: Friam <[hidden email]> on behalf of Frank Wimberly <[hidden email]>
Reply-To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <[hidden email]>
Date: Friday, March 20, 2020 at 12:02 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Outbreak Simulation

 

Don't go to sleep, please

 

I think our institutions are more robust and durable than you do.

 

Frank

---
Frank C. Wimberly
505 670-9918
Santa Fe, NM

 

On Fri, Mar 20, 2020, 12:55 PM <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi, Y’all,

 

Just got done with the FRIAM ZOOM session, which seemed to divide into two sessions, equally interesting, but quite different.  Session one was an expert discussion of the complexity dynamics of the pandemic and how technology could be used to maximize privacy while slowing transmission.  Session two was an exploration of what it is actually going to be like to live through the next six months, and what, if anything we should be doing, psychologically and practically, to prepare ourselves for it. 

 

Most riveting quote of the day, perhaps more riveting because it was so paradoxical:

 

“One thing you better have in mind as you plunge into a phase transition is a clear idea of how you want the world to look like after you come through it.”

 

Most actionable suggestion of the day: 

 

Insist by every means possible that local and state election officials begin to plan (and practice in the primaries) a non-in-person voting system that will be regarded as legitimate by the general public.

 

Personally, speaking for myself, I was left with one meta-question: 

 

How much time do we devote to trying to imagine the unimaginable.  One the one hand, it seems like we have to; on the otherhand, trying to do it is so scarey that it runs the risk of bringing all thought to a stop. 

 

I know how to handle it individually:  If I start to panic, I just climb into bed, imagine that I am never going to wake up, and go to sleep.  But conversation-wise, I am not so sure.  Perhaps agree to devote small portion of the conversation to catastrophic thinking, with a clear boundary?  Assuming we can do that,  here is my suggestion for a catastrophic discussion:

 

Worse than the worst predictions for the virus acting alone, are the consequences of the virus acting in concert with a total collapse of our institututions, food production, distributution, our elections, public order, etc. (e.g., Who is going to plant and pick the crops if the borders are closed?  Draft out-of-school college students?)  Our country is run by a gerontocracy, which, being human, will try above all to protect themselves. But they will mosty fail, in any case,  because they are the most vulnerable. What if, in their vain attempt to protect themselves, they bring down the whole?   

 

Ok.  Now I am going to bed.

 

Nick

 

Nicholas Thompson

Emeritus Professor of Ethology and Psychology

Clark University

[hidden email]

https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/

 

 

From: Friam <[hidden email]> On Behalf Of Jon Zingale
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2020 12:02 PM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Outbreak Simulation

 

At home, we are discussing the effect of the virus and the effect

of social distancing on individuals that rely on soup kitchens.

What strategies can Friam produce for feeding these people

that is consistent with the social distancing strategy?

For bonus points, please justify posted strategies with a model, 

or simulation.

 

Jon

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove


--
Merle Lefkoff, Ph.D.
President, Center for Emergent Diplomacy
emergentdiplomacy.org
Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
[hidden email]
mobile:  (303) 859-5609
skype:  merle.lelfkoff2
twitter: @Merle_Lefkoff
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Outbreak Simulation

Gillian Densmore
@Stephen Smith
(while I find out how to a reply to the right person in Gmail): 
aaaaah ok. That's what I'm concerned about with distorted information.  From what I've heard, and read on this list it's basically the fear of the unknown and some really smart, and clever people making as best guesses as possible. Basically injured frogs, with as you say a lot more drivers and having to guess what the heck to do. 
Is it really also extra equipment (health buffs for that poor frog) even archaic Negative Pressure Rooms is simply not enough? 
Thanks that does help with the other side of needed perspective.




On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 9:48 AM Steven A Smith <[hidden email]> wrote:

While I'm sympathetic with the idea that the relative magnitude of this threat *might* be on the same order as "hit by a car", and that to the extent that panic behaviour has it's own risks and unintended consequences, I think  there is a qualitative issue at hand as well.


It is as if the number of cars on the road just doubled and some of the drivers come from the UK right-hand-driving sphere such that while the risk of death has only roughly *doubled*, our instincts are not tuned to where to look (left/right) when we step out into the street.  Our intuitions just aren't well tuned to this.


Unfortunately, quantitative numbers are exponential not linear, so even if you could compare it to "hit by a car",  it doesn't calibrate for crazy fluctuations in traffic.   Like being the Frog in Frogger right after a level-up.


This just out from James Tamplin (founder of Firebase), providing a slightly finer grain model to refer to and build from: https://covidactnow.org/ .  It is worthwhile to read the assumptions that this model uses.  It is all transparent and implemented as spreadsheets that can be downloaded and tweaked if you choose.   It is strictly statistical and aggregated at the State level, but does not take into account variations in population density and personal encounters (this is a case where the style of mixing implied by suburban car-culture may be a lot safer than urban pedestrian-culture).


Mary and I have had to calibrate our sensitivity to risk several times during this episode.

  1. We were on our way to a long overdue visit to my mother (91) in her assisted living where most everyone else there is older and more at-risk even than she is.   Her TV has only one channel (Fox) and she was reluctant (2 weeks ago) to believe that my daughter in Portland with an 18 month old she hasn't met yet, really shouldn't risk gathering virus particles through 3 airports and 2 planes to visit her.    After they waved off, we planned to come ahead as a consolation prize, as did my other daughter and her 8 year old (we were both driving, avoiding high-risk virus-gathering opportunities).   Even though we were already on the road when things really started looking bad (over a week ago), I was pretty sure we shouldn't even risk *our* bringing her anything from here or our travels, but was reluctant to tell her that yet.  2 days in my daughter was leaving Denver with two kids promised a Spring Break and we negotiated a back-country tour of the 4 corners area, meeting up with them, and not risk delivering virus particles to their great/grandmother and her friends.    
  2. After listening to towns, counties, parks, states shut their doors on our heels as we traveled through, we were feeling a little "guilty" by the time we arrived back on our fairly isolated home(stead) 20 minutes outside of Santa Fe.   Our normal life involves at most 3 trips to *some* town, and even then very limited interaction with others usually.  Dropping back to 1 very careful grocery run a week is not that big of a step for us.
  3. We now have other semi-rural friends/neighbors trying to negotiate visits with us which we are trying to sort through.   In our early 60s, we are marginally at higher risk than many, but most of those friends/neighbors include at least 1 member in their late 70s or even 80s.   Their level of self-concern varies wildly from radical germophobe to devil-may-care libertarians.    I could mix with any *one* of these sub-cliques comfortably if I didn't feel like I was risking cross-contamination between them.    The highest-risk-taking groups aren't too high-risk for us, nor are the lowest-risk-takers too low, but I"m unwilling to accidentally bridge the two.
  4. Our 5 (collectively) adult children have roughly 5 different circumstances and sensibilities about this pandemic.  One is a virologist who is already engaged in working directly on the problem.  Two others are owners of small businesses which are direct personal service (crossfit gym and art framing-shop) and one is a child social worker who supervises dozens of people whose everyday job is to do home visits with families in crisis... this quarantine situation puts some of those families at yet higher risk in several ways.   The fifth just got the diagnosis (this week) that his wife very likely has a cancer that will need/deserve surgery AND chemo/rad ASAP.      Juggling our advice/support across this diversity is a challenge, though a tiny fraction I think of what *many* have to face.
  5. Mary is intrinsically more concerned about her personal health than I tend to be (about my own) which means she is moderately more healthy but at the same time more fragile in her concerns.   She took two weeks to recover from a COVID_like flu with bacterial (sinus) complications just a month ago... had that hit a week or two later, we would have had to respond *as-if* it were COVID19.   She did give over to a doc visit who threw antibiotics at her, and the secondary sinus (with fever) cleared up in days.   I have no idea how that would have unfolded under the current shadows.
  6. I just glanced through Barry's post just now and was reminded of the issue of Asymptomatic transmission vs what I prefer to think of as Presymptomatic.   Presymptomatic includes some coughing and sneezing that you don't attribute to an illness (yet)...  if you are an annual allergy sufferer, for example, it could be easy to assume the increased sneezing is an allergy (and it might be!) right up until you get hit with a fever or discover someone in your social network is symptomatic/positive.

Blah blah,

 - Steve

Gillian writes:

"One side of that is you have a higher risk getting hit by a car than not making it through this, what ever it is. "

In 2018 in Italy, there were 3,325 fatalities from road accidents.[1]   There have been 4,032 fatalities from COVID-19 so far.   The governor of California announced that 56% of the state could contract the virus.[2]  Extrapolating that to the whole country, an uncontrolled outbreak would kill about 1.8 million people at a 1% fatality rate.   There were 33,654 road fatalities in the United States in 2018.
Stay at home.

Marcus




From: Friam [hidden email] on behalf of Gillian Densmore [hidden email]
Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2020 6:53 AM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group [hidden email]
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Outbreak Simulation
 
Mmm. Well. That is true our medical system is a fragile mess as is. My concern that I realize is a pretty unpopular opinion is a total lack of perspective. One side of that is you have a higher risk getting hit by a car than not making it through this, what ever it is.   I gather the real issue isn't that, it's people who for what ever reason don't quite stay at some dry caugh cold, nasty flue like stage but  then also get just nastily congested lungs that need sterrioids and oxygen. 
And all of that on top of a surreal amount of hyping up the negative and turning it into a WWF style match from media. "PANDEMIC 2000 (PANDEMIC, DEMIC EPIDEMIC MOOONSTER DEMIC RACING 2020!!! ALL THE...SAME SOUND BYTES NOW WITH MORE COWBELL!!!"  I don't know if that'll read well in text.  Anyone that was a kid of the 80s(us) and they'd have this truck rally adds on Saturdays and Sometimes Sundays. I imagine how that'd sound with this Max-Hendroomy thing of turning this epidemic into something like that. As if it's a 80s WWF wrestling match

But then also the scientists I don't think are saying lock yourself inside.(yet) Pretty disturbing to call 'Eh well try to avoid people' as Social Distancing.

On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 11:49 PM Marcus Daniels <[hidden email]> wrote:

It’s not about stalling for a treatment, it is to pace the hospital arrivals.

On Mar 20, 2020, at 10:44 PM, Gillian Densmore <[hidden email]> wrote:


fuck "social distancing" this "shelter in place" shit has the assumption that we'll pull a rabbit out of our ass in 2-3 months tops. When in the history of medicine has that ever happend? I don't want people hurt by it.  Drumming up more hysteria than the news already does isn't helping matters either.


On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 5:01 PM Merle Lefkoff <[hidden email]> wrote:
Below is information I just saw from the Center for American Progress on strategies to insure the election process can move forward.  This is in answer to Nick's (and my) concern.

Expand opportunities for people to vote from home or at quarantine locations

States should think seriously about adopting all vote-by-mail elections with vote centers or other in-person options for people who prefer or need them. States such as Colorado, Oregon, and Washington have already implemented all-mail elections with great success, and Hawaii will begin implementing all-mail voting during the 2020 elections. Another option is to adopt no-excuse absentee voting and extend deadlines for requesting absentee ballots. A handful of states have permanent absentee votinglists, whereby every registered voter who signs up receives an absentee ballot each election. As a precaution for upcoming elections, jurisdictions should automatically maila ballot to each registered voter well in advance of voting periods. Voters should be able to return their ballots by mail or by dropping their voted ballot off at conveniently located secure drop boxes or at drive-up, drop-off locations. Ballot envelopes should be self-sealing to protect the health and safety of election workers who handle absentee ballots. All absentee ballots postmarked on or before Election Day must be counted even if they are ultimately received days later due to postal service delays.



On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 1:56 PM Marcus Daniels <[hidden email]> wrote:

I thought this was kind of interesting. 

 

https://us.dantelabs.com/pages/coronavirus

 

If they were doing something like this, might be able to collect both the viral and human data from one sample:

 

https://www.illumina.com/content/dam/illumina-marketing/documents/products/appnotes/ngs-coronavirus-app-note-1270-2020-001.pdf

 

 

From: Friam <[hidden email]> on behalf of Frank Wimberly <[hidden email]>
Reply-To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <[hidden email]>
Date: Friday, March 20, 2020 at 12:02 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Outbreak Simulation

 

Don't go to sleep, please

 

I think our institutions are more robust and durable than you do.

 

Frank

---
Frank C. Wimberly
505 670-9918
Santa Fe, NM

 

On Fri, Mar 20, 2020, 12:55 PM <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi, Y’all,

 

Just got done with the FRIAM ZOOM session, which seemed to divide into two sessions, equally interesting, but quite different.  Session one was an expert discussion of the complexity dynamics of the pandemic and how technology could be used to maximize privacy while slowing transmission.  Session two was an exploration of what it is actually going to be like to live through the next six months, and what, if anything we should be doing, psychologically and practically, to prepare ourselves for it. 

 

Most riveting quote of the day, perhaps more riveting because it was so paradoxical:

 

“One thing you better have in mind as you plunge into a phase transition is a clear idea of how you want the world to look like after you come through it.”

 

Most actionable suggestion of the day: 

 

Insist by every means possible that local and state election officials begin to plan (and practice in the primaries) a non-in-person voting system that will be regarded as legitimate by the general public.

 

Personally, speaking for myself, I was left with one meta-question: 

 

How much time do we devote to trying to imagine the unimaginable.  One the one hand, it seems like we have to; on the otherhand, trying to do it is so scarey that it runs the risk of bringing all thought to a stop. 

 

I know how to handle it individually:  If I start to panic, I just climb into bed, imagine that I am never going to wake up, and go to sleep.  But conversation-wise, I am not so sure.  Perhaps agree to devote small portion of the conversation to catastrophic thinking, with a clear boundary?  Assuming we can do that,  here is my suggestion for a catastrophic discussion:

 

Worse than the worst predictions for the virus acting alone, are the consequences of the virus acting in concert with a total collapse of our institututions, food production, distributution, our elections, public order, etc. (e.g., Who is going to plant and pick the crops if the borders are closed?  Draft out-of-school college students?)  Our country is run by a gerontocracy, which, being human, will try above all to protect themselves. But they will mosty fail, in any case,  because they are the most vulnerable. What if, in their vain attempt to protect themselves, they bring down the whole?   

 

Ok.  Now I am going to bed.

 

Nick

 

Nicholas Thompson

Emeritus Professor of Ethology and Psychology

Clark University

[hidden email]

https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/

 

 

From: Friam <[hidden email]> On Behalf Of Jon Zingale
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2020 12:02 PM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Outbreak Simulation

 

At home, we are discussing the effect of the virus and the effect

of social distancing on individuals that rely on soup kitchens.

What strategies can Friam produce for feeding these people

that is consistent with the social distancing strategy?

For bonus points, please justify posted strategies with a model, 

or simulation.

 

Jon

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove


--
Merle Lefkoff, Ph.D.
President, Center for Emergent Diplomacy
emergentdiplomacy.org
Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
[hidden email]
mobile:  (303) 859-5609
skype:  merle.lelfkoff2
twitter: @Merle_Lefkoff
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Outbreak Simulation

jon zingale
In reply to this post by Jochen Fromm-5
Although kind of a silly simulation, and since we are offering simulations up,
here is one that I wrote for the Santa Fe Institute last year:

Jon

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Outbreak Simulation

David Eric Smith
In reply to this post by Marcus G. Daniels
Yes, exactly. 

1.8 million people at a 1% fatality rate.

That’s what you get in countries that can give the best of their health service to patients who get very sick.  Italy’s death rate is currently around 10%.  
So multiply 1.8 million by 10x.  

There may be several factors that contribute to the worse patient profile in Italy, but certainly a large part of it is just overwhelming their capacity.  

I was glad Roger forwarded the Emily Landon segment.  Sanjay Gupta did a similarly good one on Colbert last week.  This idea that we have responsibilities to each other was a prominent part of his overall message, and the one that I have wished to hear put forward more often.

Eric



On Mar 21, 2020, at 11:55 PM, Marcus Daniels <[hidden email]> wrote:

Gillian writes:

"One side of that is you have a higher risk getting hit by a car than not making it through this, what ever it is. "

In 2018 in Italy, there were 3,325 fatalities from road accidents.[1]   There have been 4,032 fatalities from COVID-19 so far.   The governor of California announced that 56% of the state could contract the virus.[2]  Extrapolating that to the whole country, an uncontrolled outbreak would kill about 1.8 million people at a 1% fatality rate.   There were 33,654 road fatalities in the United States in 2018.
Stay at home.

Marcus




From: Friam <[hidden email]> on behalf of Gillian Densmore <[hidden email]>
Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2020 6:53 AM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Outbreak Simulation
 
Mmm. Well. That is true our medical system is a fragile mess as is. My concern that I realize is a pretty unpopular opinion is a total lack of perspective. One side of that is you have a higher risk getting hit by a car than not making it through this, what ever it is.   I gather the real issue isn't that, it's people who for what ever reason don't quite stay at some dry caugh cold, nasty flue like stage but  then also get just nastily congested lungs that need sterrioids and oxygen. 
And all of that on top of a surreal amount of hyping up the negative and turning it into a WWF style match from media. "PANDEMIC 2000 (PANDEMIC, DEMIC EPIDEMIC MOOONSTER DEMIC RACING 2020!!! ALL THE...SAME SOUND BYTES NOW WITH MORE COWBELL!!!"  I don't know if that'll read well in text.  Anyone that was a kid of the 80s(us) and they'd have this truck rally adds on Saturdays and Sometimes Sundays. I imagine how that'd sound with this Max-Hendroomy thing of turning this epidemic into something like that. As if it's a 80s WWF wrestling match

But then also the scientists I don't think are saying lock yourself inside.(yet) Pretty disturbing to call 'Eh well try to avoid people' as Social Distancing.

On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 11:49 PM Marcus Daniels <[hidden email]> wrote:

It’s not about stalling for a treatment, it is to pace the hospital arrivals.

On Mar 20, 2020, at 10:44 PM, Gillian Densmore <[hidden email]> wrote:


fuck "social distancing" this "shelter in place" shit has the assumption that we'll pull a rabbit out of our ass in 2-3 months tops. When in the history of medicine has that ever happend? I don't want people hurt by it.  Drumming up more hysteria than the news already does isn't helping matters either.


On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 5:01 PM Merle Lefkoff <[hidden email]> wrote:
Below is information I just saw from the Center for American Progress on strategies to insure the election process can move forward.  This is in answer to Nick's (and my) concern.

Expand opportunities for people to vote from home or at quarantine locations

States should think seriously about adopting all vote-by-mail elections with vote centers or other in-person options for people who prefer or need them. States such as Colorado, Oregon, and Washington have already implemented all-mail elections with great success, and Hawaii will begin implementing all-mail voting during the 2020 elections. Another option is to adopt no-excuse absentee voting and extend deadlines for requesting absentee ballots. A handful of states have permanent absentee votinglists, whereby every registered voter who signs up receives an absentee ballot each election. As a precaution for upcoming elections, jurisdictions should automatically maila ballot to each registered voter well in advance of voting periods. Voters should be able to return their ballots by mail or by dropping their voted ballot off at conveniently located secure drop boxes or at drive-up, drop-off locations. Ballot envelopes should be self-sealing to protect the health and safety of election workers who handle absentee ballots. All absentee ballots postmarked on or before Election Day must be counted even if they are ultimately received days later due to postal service delays.


On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 1:56 PM Marcus Daniels <[hidden email]> wrote:
I thought this was kind of interesting.  
 
 
If they were doing something like this, might be able to collect both the viral and human data from one sample:
 
 
 
From: Friam <[hidden email]> on behalf of Frank Wimberly <[hidden email]>
Reply-To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <[hidden email]>
Date: Friday, March 20, 2020 at 12:02 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Outbreak Simulation
 
Don't go to sleep, please 
 
I think our institutions are more robust and durable than you do.
 
Frank
---
Frank C. Wimberly
505 670-9918
Santa Fe, NM
 
On Fri, Mar 20, 2020, 12:55 PM <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi, Y’all, 
 
Just got done with the FRIAM ZOOM session, which seemed to divide into two sessions, equally interesting, but quite different.  Session one was an expert discussion of the complexity dynamics of the pandemic and how technology could be used to maximize privacy while slowing transmission.  Session two was an exploration of what it is actually going to be like to live through the next six months, and what, if anything we should be doing, psychologically and practically, to prepare ourselves for it.  
 
Most riveting quote of the day, perhaps more riveting because it was so paradoxical:
 
“One thing you better have in mind as you plunge into a phase transition is a clear idea of how you want the world to look like after you come through it.”
 
Most actionable suggestion of the day:  
 
Insist by every means possible that local and state election officials begin to plan (and practice in the primaries) a non-in-person voting system that will be regarded as legitimate by the general public.
 
Personally, speaking for myself, I was left with one meta-question: 
 
How much time do we devote to trying to imagine the unimaginable.  One the one hand, it seems like we have to; on the otherhand, trying to do it is so scarey that it runs the risk of bringing all thought to a stop. 
 
I know how to handle it individually:  If I start to panic, I just climb into bed, imagine that I am never going to wake up, and go to sleep.  But conversation-wise, I am not so sure.  Perhaps agree to devote small portion of the conversation to catastrophic thinking, with a clear boundary?  Assuming we can do that,  here is my suggestion for a catastrophic discussion:
 
Worse than the worst predictions for the virus acting alone, are the consequences of the virus acting in concert with a total collapse of our institututions, food production, distributution, our elections, public order, etc. (e.g., Who is going to plant and pick the crops if the borders are closed?  Draft out-of-school college students?)  Our country is run by a gerontocracy, which, being human, will try above all to protect themselves. But they will mosty fail, in any case,  because they are the most vulnerable. What if, in their vain attempt to protect themselves, they bring down the whole?   
 
Ok.  Now I am going to bed. 
 
Nick
 
Nicholas Thompson
Emeritus Professor of Ethology and Psychology
Clark University
 
 
From: Friam <[hidden email]> On Behalf Of Jon Zingale
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2020 12:02 PM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Outbreak Simulation
 
At home, we are discussing the effect of the virus and the effect
of social distancing on individuals that rely on soup kitchens.
What strategies can Friam produce for feeding these people
that is consistent with the social distancing strategy?
For bonus points, please justify posted strategies with a model, 
or simulation.
 
Jon
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove


-- 
Merle Lefkoff, Ph.D.
President, Center for Emergent Diplomacy
emergentdiplomacy.org
Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
[hidden email]
mobile:  (303) 859-5609
skype:  merle.lelfkoff2
twitter: @Merle_Lefkoff
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove


============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Outbreak Simulation

thompnickson2
In reply to this post by thompnickson2

All,

 

Nothing more pathetic than a man answering his own emails, but SOMEBODY has to do it.

 

Not withstanding John’s reassurances that we aren’t the sort of people to let an election slide by, even in the roughest time, I still want to talk about as tyranny as the opportunistic infection that will kill us all.

 

One of the natural limits on tyranny, ultimately perhaps the only one, is that people can put down their tools and go out into the street.  Now, in a pandemic, that is not possible. But with social media we have perhaps the equivalent of digital “streets”.  The trouble is, of course, that social media can be choked off. Also, is there any equivalent to the effect that a million person march has on the city in which they are marching? 

 

I guess I am wishing you smart, up-to-date complexity theorists would devote some time to the political phase change that could happen sometime between the November election date and the inauguration.  Sometime between now and November we have to design, implement, and legitimize non-in-person elections in 50 states.  And we have to do that while staving off the worst effects of a pandemic.  And we have to do it while a substantial proportion of our leader-class is incapacitated with illness.  And the rest of them are frantically trying to stay alive by not being in contact with anyone, least-wise voters.   How do we stay connected as polity?  How do we go out into the streets? 

 

It’s a perfect storm. 

 

Now, I did not get to the FRIAM meeting until well into Stephen’s presentation, so it’s possible some of this was covered. 

 

Nick

 

Nicholas Thompson

Emeritus Professor of Ethology and Psychology

Clark University

[hidden email]

https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/

 

 

From: [hidden email] <[hidden email]>
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2020 12:55 PM
To: 'The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group' <[hidden email]>
Subject: RE: [FRIAM] Outbreak Simulation

 

Hi, Y’all,

 

Just got done with the FRIAM ZOOM session, which seemed to divide into two sessions, equally interesting, but quite different.  Session one was an expert discussion of the complexity dynamics of the pandemic and how technology could be used to maximize privacy while slowing transmission.  Session two was an exploration of what it is actually going to be like to live through the next six months, and what, if anything we should be doing, psychologically and practically, to prepare ourselves for it. 

 

Most riveting quote of the day, perhaps more riveting because it was so paradoxical:

 

“One thing you better have in mind as you plunge into a phase transition is a clear idea of how you want the world to look like after you come through it.”

 

Most actionable suggestion of the day: 

 

Insist by every means possible that local and state election officials begin to plan (and practice in the primaries) a non-in-person voting system that will be regarded as legitimate by the general public.

 

Personally, speaking for myself, I was left with one meta-question: 

 

How much time do we devote to trying to imagine the unimaginable.  One the one hand, it seems like we have to; on the otherhand, trying to do it is so scarey that it runs the risk of bringing all thought to a stop. 

 

I know how to handle it individually:  If I start to panic, I just climb into bed, imagine that I am never going to wake up, and go to sleep.  But conversation-wise, I am not so sure.  Perhaps agree to devote small portion of the conversation to catastrophic thinking, with a clear boundary?  Assuming we can do that,  here is my suggestion for a catastrophic discussion:

 

Worse than the worst predictions for the virus acting alone, are the consequences of the virus acting in concert with a total collapse of our institututions, food production, distributution, our elections, public order, etc. (e.g., Who is going to plant and pick the crops if the borders are closed?  Draft out-of-school college students?)  Our country is run by a gerontocracy, which, being human, will try above all to protect themselves. But they will mosty fail, in any case,  because they are the most vulnerable. What if, in their vain attempt to protect themselves, they bring down the whole?   

 

Ok.  Now I am going to bed.

 

Nick

 

Nicholas Thompson

Emeritus Professor of Ethology and Psychology

Clark University

[hidden email]

https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/

 

 

 

From: Friam <[hidden email]> On Behalf Of Jon Zingale
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2020 12:02 PM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Outbreak Simulation

 

At home, we are discussing the effect of the virus and the effect

of social distancing on individuals that rely on soup kitchens.

What strategies can Friam produce for feeding these people

that is consistent with the social distancing strategy?

For bonus points, please justify posted strategies with a model, 

or simulation.

 

Jon


============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove