New Study: ‘Publish or perish’ factor in spiraling retractions

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
4 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

New Study: ‘Publish or perish’ factor in spiraling retractions

Tom Johnson
fyi

http://www.resourceshelf.com/2009/08/19/new-study-publish-or-perish-factor-in-spiralling-retractions/

-tj


============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: New Study: ‘Publish or perish’ factor in spiraling retractions

Pamela McCorduck
Tom, very interesting. Not surprising, but very interesting.


On Aug 20, 2009, at 12:13 PM, Tom Johnson wrote:

fyi

http://www.resourceshelf.com/2009/08/19/new-study-publish-or-perish-factor-in-spiralling-retractions/

-tj

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org


The earth/Seemed like to Heav'n, a seat where gods might dwell/Or wander with delight and love to haunt/Her sacred shades.


John Milton, "Paradise Lost"


============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: New Study: ‘Publish or perish’ factor in spiraling retractions

Eric Charles
In reply to this post by Tom Johnson

Interesting,
I am reminded of the talk surrounding Cronkite's death. Certainly the number of retracted news reports has increased much more quickly than the retraction of academic reports. However, it is also much harder to demonstrate the inaccuracy of a scientific publication.  Both phenomenon may be symptomatic of an attitude change towards the dissemination of information. Among other things, most evaluators of both reporters and academics share an unhealthy obsession with first reports, with quantity over quality, and with "sexyness" over other measures of importance or accuracy.

Eric



On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 02:13 PM, Tom Johnson <[hidden email]> wrote:

fyi

<a href="http://www.resourceshelf.com/2009/08/19/new-study-publish-or-perish-factor-in-spiralling-retractions/" onclick="window.open('http://www.resourceshelf.com/2009/08/19/new-study-publish-or-perish-factor-in-spiralling-retractions/');return false;">http://www.resourceshelf.com/2009/08/19/new-study-publish-or-perish-factor-in-spiralling-retractions/

-tj

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
Eric Charles

Professional Student and
Assistant Professor of Psychology
Penn State University
Altoona, PA 16601


Eric Charles

Professional Student and
Assistant Professor of Psychology
Penn State University
Altoona, PA 16601



============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: New Study: ‘Publish or perish’ factor in spiraling retractions

Tom Johnson
An additional factor surely must be tools like http://turnitin.com/static/index.html

That said, I do not know of a single newspaper or magazine in the U.S. that uses something like this on a regular basis.  Actually, relatively few professors use them, too.

-tj

On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 2:47 PM, ERIC P. CHARLES <[hidden email]> wrote:

Interesting,
I am reminded of the talk surrounding Cronkite's death. Certainly the number of retracted news reports has increased much more quickly than the retraction of academic reports. However, it is also much harder to demonstrate the inaccuracy of a scientific publication.  Both phenomenon may be symptomatic of an attitude change towards the dissemination of information. Among other things, most evaluators of both reporters and academics share an unhealthy obsession with first reports, with quantity over quality, and with "sexyness" over other measures of importance or accuracy.

Eric



On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 02:13 PM, Tom Johnson <[hidden email]> wrote:

fyi

http://www.resourceshelf.com/2009/08/19/new-study-publish-or-perish-factor-in-spiralling-retractions/

-tj

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
Eric Charles

Professional Student and
Assistant Professor of Psychology
Penn State University
Altoona, PA 16601


Eric Charles

Professional Student and
Assistant Professor of Psychology
Penn State University
Altoona, PA 16601



============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org



--
==========================================
J. T. Johnson
Institute for Analytic Journalism -- Santa Fe, NM USA
www.analyticjournalism.com
505.577.6482(c)                                    505.473.9646(h)
http://www.jtjohnson.com                 [hidden email]

"Be Your Own Publisher"
http://indiepubwest.com
==========================================

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org