​Academia.edu​

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
13 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

​Academia.edu​

Owen Densmore
Administrator
Does any here use ​Academia.edu​? 

They are maturing slowly but surely and I'm wondering if they're soon to be the LinkedIn for published papers. 

They recently sent an invite to have your own page, and I wondered if it was worth it, or maybe scamy/phishy.

   -- Owen

Inline image 1

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: ​Academia.edu​

Nick Thompson

I cast my lot with R. G., and I am not at all sure of my decision. 

 

They are such BONEHEADS!

 

See, https://www.researchgate.net/project/HELPING-RESEARCH-GATE-TO-FULFILL-ITS-PROMISE If you clink the links, you will see 30 or so suggestions for improvement which they will not humble themselves to speak to, let alone make any changes. 

 

My feeling, when I scanned it a few moss ago, was that Academe wasn’t any more imaginative.

 

Nice graphic though.

 

Nick

 

Nicholas S. Thompson

Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Biology

Clark University

http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/

 

From: Friam [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Owen Densmore
Sent: Saturday, May 06, 2017 10:48 AM
To: Wedtech <[hidden email]>; Complexity Coffee Group <[hidden email]>
Subject: [FRIAM] ​Academia.edu​

 

Does any here use ​Academia.edu​? 

 

They are maturing slowly but surely and I'm wondering if they're soon to be the LinkedIn for published papers. 

 

They recently sent an invite to have your own page, and I wondered if it was worth it, or maybe scamy/phishy.

 

   -- Owen

 

Inline image 1


============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: ​Academia.edu​

Merle Lefkoff-2
In reply to this post by Owen Densmore
Hey Owen, I like it a lot.

On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 10:47 AM, Owen Densmore <[hidden email]> wrote:
Does any here use ​Academia.edu​? 

They are maturing slowly but surely and I'm wondering if they're soon to be the LinkedIn for published papers. 

They recently sent an invite to have your own page, and I wondered if it was worth it, or maybe scamy/phishy.

   -- Owen

Inline image 1

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove



--
Merle Lefkoff, Ph.D.
President, Center for Emergent Diplomacy
emergentdiplomacy.org
Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA

Visiting Professor in Integrative Peacebuilding
Saint Paul University
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

[hidden email]
mobile:  (303) 859-5609
skype:  merle.lelfkoff2

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: ​Academia.edu​

Owen Densmore
Administrator
Here's what I think: Nick should start on his creation of Friam Threads, captured snippets or gists, and post them on Medium. Then once a year, we'll choose which ones could lead to nifty papers and publish them.

I think it would be fun!

   -- Owen


============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: ​Academia.edu​

Marcus G. Daniels

According to  this..

 

http://www.city-data.com/income/income-Santa-Fe-New-Mexico.html

 

..there are about 8037 people in Santa Fe with a household income above $100k/year.   Baltimore has a 3% tax.  D.C. has a 8.5% income tax for income over $40k/year.

 

https://www.thebalance.com/cities-that-levy-income-taxes-3193246

 

Mimic that, only taxing just those with > $100k incomes, and Santa Fe would bring in $25-$70 million dollars a year.  Tax 5% across the board and it would be nearly $130 million (given the 2015 data).   

 

Throw in some property tax for the richer folks, maybe could haul in $150 or $200 million a year. 

 

From: Friam [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Owen Densmore
Sent: Sunday, May 07, 2017 10:48 AM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] ​Academia.edu​

 

Here's what I think: Nick should start on his creation of Friam Threads, captured snippets or gists, and post them on Medium. Then once a year, we'll choose which ones could lead to nifty papers and publish them.

 

I think it would be fun!

 

   -- Owen

 


============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: ​Academia.edu​

Eric Charles-2
I have been on both Research Gate and Academia for some time. I am not particularly active in either (except for an occasional foray into an R.G. forum). However, it seems evident that my uploaded works receive a wider readership. Proprietary search engines (JSTOR, etc.) are on the outs, and papers easily accessed via Google search and the like are much more likely to be read and cited. Google Scholar searches R.G. and Academia and will pop up a PDF link right next to the search results.

This is particularly obvious with regards to the professional book reviews I write every year or two. Because the venues for the reviews aren't easy for most to access, I doubt I get more than a handful of readers there. However, because I tend to give the flashy titles, a few have several hundred reads through the websites. That (I hope) helps the authors of the reviewed books more than it helps me, but it speaks strongly to the increased attention it is possible to get for work by virtue of posting on those sites. This has been much, much more effective than posting to a personal website, and takes less upkeep for steady traffic than my academic blog.

If I was in a field that used ArXiv, and didn't secretly like the idea of lay people and students sometimes reading my work, I wouldn't be on either. But psychology doesn't do ArXiv, and I do secretly like those ideas.

Our article on MOTH has 62 reads through Research Gate and 4 through Academia (via my upload). Probably it has more reads through JASSS. In contrast, I have an encyclopedia entry about the history of Clark University's psychology department that has 355 reads on Research Gate and 22 through Academia. That is probably far more than have read the work via its published source. My most read article on Academia is a statistical simulation I published during my grad school days, which has over 1,000 reads. Aside from indicating I made a poor career choices by sticking with my love of experimental psychology, that suggest the potential audience, even for highly technical papers, is quite large.

Best,
Eric




-----------
Eric P. Charles, Ph.D.
Supervisory Survey Statistician
U.S. Marine Corps

On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 8:08 PM, Russ Abbott <[hidden email]> wrote:
You might want to consider Zenodo.

Host institution

Zenodo is hosted by CERN which has existed since 1954 and currently has an experimental programme defined for the next 20+ years. CERN is a memory institution for High Energy Physics and renowned for its pioneering work in Open Access. Organisationally Zenodo is embedded in the IT Department, Collaboration Devices and Applications Group, Digital Repositories Section (IT-CDA-DR).

Zenodo is offered by CERN as part of its mission to make available the results of its work (CERN Convention, Article II, §1).

Funding

Zenodo is funded by:

  • European Commission via the OpenAIRE projects:
    • FP7: OpenAIRE (246686), OpenAIREplus (283595)
    • Horizon 2020: OpenAIRE2020 (643410) and OpenAIRE-Connect (731011).
  • CERN
  • Donations via CERN & Society Foundation

Zenodo is developed and supported as a marginal activity, and hosted on top of existing infrastructure and services at CERN, in order to reduce operational costs and rely on existing efforts for High Energy Physics. CERN has some of the world’s top experts in running large scale research data infrastructures and digital repositories that we rely on in order to deliver a trusted digital repository.


Content

  • Scope: All fields of research. All types of research artifacts. Content must not violate privacy or copyright, or breach confidentiality or non-disclosure agreements for data collected from human subjects.
  • Status of research data: Any status is accepted, from any stage of the research lifecycle.
  • Eligible depositors: Anyone may register as user of Zenodo. All users are allowed to deposit content for which they possess the appropriate rights.
  • Ownership: By uploading content, no change of ownership is implied and no property rights are transferred to CERN. All uploaded content remains the property of the parties prior to submission.
  • Data file formats: All formats are allowed - even preservation unfriendly. We are working on guidelines and features that will help people deposit in preservation friendly formats.
  • Volume and size limitations: Total files size limit per record is 50GB. Higher quotas can be requested and granted on a case-by-case basis.
  • Data quality: All information is provided “as-is”, and the user shall hold Zenodo and information providers supplying data to Zenodo free and harmless in connection with the use of such information.
  • Metadata types and sources: All metadata is stored internally in JSON-format according to a defined JSON schema. Metadata is exported in several standard formats such as MARCXML, Dublin Core, and DataCite Metadata Schema (according to the OpenAIRE Guidelines).
  • Language: For textual items, English is preferred but all languages are accepted.
  • Licenses: Users must specify a license for all publicly available files. Licenses for closed access files may be specified in the description field.

Access and Reuse

  • Access to data objects: Files may be deposited under closed, open, or embargoed access. Files deposited under closed access are protected against unauthorized access at all levels. Access to metadata and data files is provided over standard protocols such as HTTP and OAI-PMH.
  • Use and re-use of data objects: Use and re-use is subject to the license under which the data objects were deposited.
  • Embargo status: Users may deposit content under an embargo status and provide and end date for the embargo. The repository will restrict access to the data until the end of the embargo period; at which time, the content will become publically available automatically.
  • Restricted Access: Users may deposit restricted files with the ability to share access with others if certain requirements are met. These files will not be made publicly available and sharing will be made possible only by the approval of depositor of the original file.
  • Metadata access and reuse: Metadata is licensed under CC0, except for email addresses. All metadata is exported via OAI-PMH and can be harvested.



On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 10:23 AM Marcus Daniels <[hidden email]> wrote:

According to  this..

 

http://www.city-data.com/income/income-Santa-Fe-New-Mexico.html

 

..there are about 8037 people in Santa Fe with a household income above $100k/year.   Baltimore has a 3% tax.  D.C. has a 8.5% income tax for income over $40k/year.

 

https://www.thebalance.com/cities-that-levy-income-taxes-3193246

 

Mimic that, only taxing just those with > $100k incomes, and Santa Fe would bring in $25-$70 million dollars a year.  Tax 5% across the board and it would be nearly $130 million (given the 2015 data).   

 

Throw in some property tax for the richer folks, maybe could haul in $150 or $200 million a year. 

 

From: Friam [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Owen Densmore
Sent: Sunday, May 07, 2017 10:48 AM


To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] ​Academia.edu​

 

Here's what I think: Nick should start on his creation of Friam Threads, captured snippets or gists, and post them on Medium. Then once a year, we'll choose which ones could lead to nifty papers and publish them.

 

I think it would be fun!

 

   -- Owen

 

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove


============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: ​Academia.edu​

Nick Thompson

Thanks, Eric,

 

Sounds like, as an old friend used to say, “It’s a throw-up.”

 

Nick

 

Nicholas S. Thompson

Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Biology

Clark University

http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/

 

From: Friam [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Eric Charles
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2017 7:26 AM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] ​Academia.edu​

 

I have been on both Research Gate and Academia for some time. I am not particularly active in either (except for an occasional foray into an R.G. forum). However, it seems evident that my uploaded works receive a wider readership. Proprietary search engines (JSTOR, etc.) are on the outs, and papers easily accessed via Google search and the like are much more likely to be read and cited. Google Scholar searches R.G. and Academia and will pop up a PDF link right next to the search results.

 

This is particularly obvious with regards to the professional book reviews I write every year or two. Because the venues for the reviews aren't easy for most to access, I doubt I get more than a handful of readers there. However, because I tend to give the flashy titles, a few have several hundred reads through the websites. That (I hope) helps the authors of the reviewed books more than it helps me, but it speaks strongly to the increased attention it is possible to get for work by virtue of posting on those sites. This has been much, much more effective than posting to a personal website, and takes less upkeep for steady traffic than my academic blog.

 

If I was in a field that used ArXiv, and didn't secretly like the idea of lay people and students sometimes reading my work, I wouldn't be on either. But psychology doesn't do ArXiv, and I do secretly like those ideas.

 

Our article on MOTH has 62 reads through Research Gate and 4 through Academia (via my upload). Probably it has more reads through JASSS. In contrast, I have an encyclopedia entry about the history of Clark University's psychology department that has 355 reads on Research Gate and 22 through Academia. That is probably far more than have read the work via its published source. My most read article on Academia is a statistical simulation I published during my grad school days, which has over 1,000 reads. Aside from indicating I made a poor career choices by sticking with my love of experimental psychology, that suggest the potential audience, even for highly technical papers, is quite large.

 

Best,

Eric

 

 



-----------
Eric P. Charles, Ph.D.
Supervisory Survey Statistician

U.S. Marine Corps

 

On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 8:08 PM, Russ Abbott <[hidden email]> wrote:

You might want to consider Zenodo.

 

Host institution

Zenodo is hosted by CERN which has existed since 1954 and currently has an experimental programme defined for the next 20+ years. CERN is a memory institution for High Energy Physics and renowned for its pioneering work in Open Access. Organisationally Zenodo is embedded in the IT Department, Collaboration Devices and Applications Group, Digital Repositories Section (IT-CDA-DR).

Zenodo is offered by CERN as part of its mission to make available the results of its work (CERN Convention, Article II, §1).

Funding

Zenodo is funded by:

  • European Commission via the OpenAIRE projects:
    • FP7: OpenAIRE (246686), OpenAIREplus (283595)
    • Horizon 2020: OpenAIRE2020 (643410) and OpenAIRE-Connect (731011).

Zenodo is developed and supported as a marginal activity, and hosted on top of existing infrastructure and services at CERN, in order to reduce operational costs and rely on existing efforts for High Energy Physics. CERN has some of the world’s top experts in running large scale research data infrastructures and digital repositories that we rely on in order to deliver a trusted digital repository.

 

Content

  • Scope: All fields of research. All types of research artifacts. Content must not violate privacy or copyright, or breach confidentiality or non-disclosure agreements for data collected from human subjects.
  • Status of research data: Any status is accepted, from any stage of the research lifecycle.
  • Eligible depositors: Anyone may register as user of Zenodo. All users are allowed to deposit content for which they possess the appropriate rights.
  • Ownership: By uploading content, no change of ownership is implied and no property rights are transferred to CERN. All uploaded content remains the property of the parties prior to submission.
  • Data file formats: All formats are allowed - even preservation unfriendly. We are working on guidelines and features that will help people deposit in preservation friendly formats.
  • Volume and size limitations: Total files size limit per record is 50GB. Higher quotas can be requested and granted on a case-by-case basis.
  • Data quality: All information is provided “as-is”, and the user shall hold Zenodo and information providers supplying data to Zenodo free and harmless in connection with the use of such information.
  • Metadata types and sources: All metadata is stored internally in JSON-format according to a defined JSON schema. Metadata is exported in several standard formats such as MARCXML, Dublin Core, and DataCite Metadata Schema (according to the OpenAIRE Guidelines).
  • Language: For textual items, English is preferred but all languages are accepted.
  • Licenses: Users must specify a license for all publicly available files. Licenses for closed access files may be specified in the description field.

Access and Reuse

  • Access to data objects: Files may be deposited under closed, open, or embargoed access. Files deposited under closed access are protected against unauthorized access at all levels. Access to metadata and data files is provided over standard protocols such as HTTP and OAI-PMH.
  • Use and re-use of data objects: Use and re-use is subject to the license under which the data objects were deposited.
  • Embargo status: Users may deposit content under an embargo status and provide and end date for the embargo. The repository will restrict access to the data until the end of the embargo period; at which time, the content will become publically available automatically.
  • Restricted Access: Users may deposit restricted files with the ability to share access with others if certain requirements are met. These files will not be made publicly available and sharing will be made possible only by the approval of depositor of the original file.
  • Metadata access and reuse: Metadata is licensed under CC0, except for email addresses. All metadata is exported via OAI-PMH and can be harvested.

 

 

On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 10:23 AM Marcus Daniels <[hidden email]> wrote:

According to  this..

 

http://www.city-data.com/income/income-Santa-Fe-New-Mexico.html

 

..there are about 8037 people in Santa Fe with a household income above $100k/year.   Baltimore has a 3% tax.  D.C. has a 8.5% income tax for income over $40k/year.

 

https://www.thebalance.com/cities-that-levy-income-taxes-3193246

 

Mimic that, only taxing just those with > $100k incomes, and Santa Fe would bring in $25-$70 million dollars a year.  Tax 5% across the board and it would be nearly $130 million (given the 2015 data).   

 

Throw in some property tax for the richer folks, maybe could haul in $150 or $200 million a year. 

 

From: Friam [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Owen Densmore
Sent: Sunday, May 07, 2017 10:48 AM


To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] ​Academia.edu​

 

Here's what I think: Nick should start on his creation of Friam Threads, captured snippets or gists, and post them on Medium. Then once a year, we'll choose which ones could lead to nifty papers and publish them.

 

I think it would be fun!

 

   -- Owen

 

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove


============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove

 


============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: ​Academia.edu​

Nick Thompson
In reply to this post by Eric Charles-2

Eric,

 

I forgot to ask.  Are the people at Academe as STUPID as the people at R. G.?    I mean rigid, bone-headed,. Unimaginative, slow-witted, and lacking totally in humor and imagination? 

 

Just asking.

 

Nick

 

Nicholas S. Thompson

Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Biology

Clark University

http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/

 

From: Friam [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Eric Charles
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2017 7:26 AM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] ​Academia.edu​

 

I have been on both Research Gate and Academia for some time. I am not particularly active in either (except for an occasional foray into an R.G. forum). However, it seems evident that my uploaded works receive a wider readership. Proprietary search engines (JSTOR, etc.) are on the outs, and papers easily accessed via Google search and the like are much more likely to be read and cited. Google Scholar searches R.G. and Academia and will pop up a PDF link right next to the search results.

 

This is particularly obvious with regards to the professional book reviews I write every year or two. Because the venues for the reviews aren't easy for most to access, I doubt I get more than a handful of readers there. However, because I tend to give the flashy titles, a few have several hundred reads through the websites. That (I hope) helps the authors of the reviewed books more than it helps me, but it speaks strongly to the increased attention it is possible to get for work by virtue of posting on those sites. This has been much, much more effective than posting to a personal website, and takes less upkeep for steady traffic than my academic blog.

 

If I was in a field that used ArXiv, and didn't secretly like the idea of lay people and students sometimes reading my work, I wouldn't be on either. But psychology doesn't do ArXiv, and I do secretly like those ideas.

 

Our article on MOTH has 62 reads through Research Gate and 4 through Academia (via my upload). Probably it has more reads through JASSS. In contrast, I have an encyclopedia entry about the history of Clark University's psychology department that has 355 reads on Research Gate and 22 through Academia. That is probably far more than have read the work via its published source. My most read article on Academia is a statistical simulation I published during my grad school days, which has over 1,000 reads. Aside from indicating I made a poor career choices by sticking with my love of experimental psychology, that suggest the potential audience, even for highly technical papers, is quite large.

 

Best,

Eric

 

 



-----------
Eric P. Charles, Ph.D.
Supervisory Survey Statistician

U.S. Marine Corps

 

On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 8:08 PM, Russ Abbott <[hidden email]> wrote:

You might want to consider Zenodo.

 

Host institution

Zenodo is hosted by CERN which has existed since 1954 and currently has an experimental programme defined for the next 20+ years. CERN is a memory institution for High Energy Physics and renowned for its pioneering work in Open Access. Organisationally Zenodo is embedded in the IT Department, Collaboration Devices and Applications Group, Digital Repositories Section (IT-CDA-DR).

Zenodo is offered by CERN as part of its mission to make available the results of its work (CERN Convention, Article II, §1).

Funding

Zenodo is funded by:

  • European Commission via the OpenAIRE projects:
    • FP7: OpenAIRE (246686), OpenAIREplus (283595)
    • Horizon 2020: OpenAIRE2020 (643410) and OpenAIRE-Connect (731011).

Zenodo is developed and supported as a marginal activity, and hosted on top of existing infrastructure and services at CERN, in order to reduce operational costs and rely on existing efforts for High Energy Physics. CERN has some of the world’s top experts in running large scale research data infrastructures and digital repositories that we rely on in order to deliver a trusted digital repository.

 

Content

  • Scope: All fields of research. All types of research artifacts. Content must not violate privacy or copyright, or breach confidentiality or non-disclosure agreements for data collected from human subjects.
  • Status of research data: Any status is accepted, from any stage of the research lifecycle.
  • Eligible depositors: Anyone may register as user of Zenodo. All users are allowed to deposit content for which they possess the appropriate rights.
  • Ownership: By uploading content, no change of ownership is implied and no property rights are transferred to CERN. All uploaded content remains the property of the parties prior to submission.
  • Data file formats: All formats are allowed - even preservation unfriendly. We are working on guidelines and features that will help people deposit in preservation friendly formats.
  • Volume and size limitations: Total files size limit per record is 50GB. Higher quotas can be requested and granted on a case-by-case basis.
  • Data quality: All information is provided “as-is”, and the user shall hold Zenodo and information providers supplying data to Zenodo free and harmless in connection with the use of such information.
  • Metadata types and sources: All metadata is stored internally in JSON-format according to a defined JSON schema. Metadata is exported in several standard formats such as MARCXML, Dublin Core, and DataCite Metadata Schema (according to the OpenAIRE Guidelines).
  • Language: For textual items, English is preferred but all languages are accepted.
  • Licenses: Users must specify a license for all publicly available files. Licenses for closed access files may be specified in the description field.

Access and Reuse

  • Access to data objects: Files may be deposited under closed, open, or embargoed access. Files deposited under closed access are protected against unauthorized access at all levels. Access to metadata and data files is provided over standard protocols such as HTTP and OAI-PMH.
  • Use and re-use of data objects: Use and re-use is subject to the license under which the data objects were deposited.
  • Embargo status: Users may deposit content under an embargo status and provide and end date for the embargo. The repository will restrict access to the data until the end of the embargo period; at which time, the content will become publically available automatically.
  • Restricted Access: Users may deposit restricted files with the ability to share access with others if certain requirements are met. These files will not be made publicly available and sharing will be made possible only by the approval of depositor of the original file.
  • Metadata access and reuse: Metadata is licensed under CC0, except for email addresses. All metadata is exported via OAI-PMH and can be harvested.

 

 

On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 10:23 AM Marcus Daniels <[hidden email]> wrote:

According to  this..

 

http://www.city-data.com/income/income-Santa-Fe-New-Mexico.html

 

..there are about 8037 people in Santa Fe with a household income above $100k/year.   Baltimore has a 3% tax.  D.C. has a 8.5% income tax for income over $40k/year.

 

https://www.thebalance.com/cities-that-levy-income-taxes-3193246

 

Mimic that, only taxing just those with > $100k incomes, and Santa Fe would bring in $25-$70 million dollars a year.  Tax 5% across the board and it would be nearly $130 million (given the 2015 data).   

 

Throw in some property tax for the richer folks, maybe could haul in $150 or $200 million a year. 

 

From: Friam [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Owen Densmore
Sent: Sunday, May 07, 2017 10:48 AM


To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] ​Academia.edu​

 

Here's what I think: Nick should start on his creation of Friam Threads, captured snippets or gists, and post them on Medium. Then once a year, we'll choose which ones could lead to nifty papers and publish them.

 

I think it would be fun!

 

   -- Owen

 

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove


============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove

 


============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: ​Academia.edu​

Gary Schiltz-4
In reply to this post by Eric Charles-2


On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 8:26 AM, Eric Charles <[hidden email]> wrote:
If I was in a field that used ArXiv, and didn't secretly like the idea of lay people and students sometimes reading my work, I wouldn't be on either. But psychology doesn't do ArXiv, and I do secretly like those ideas.

I'm curious why you say that you "secretly" like the idea of lay people and students reading your work. Is there some taboo among psychologists against non-professionals reading professional scientific articles?
 
Our article on MOTH has 62 reads through Research Gate and 4 through Academia (via my upload). 

I may have missed part of the thread, but what does MOTH stand for? Or are you talking about the psychology of the night time equivalent of butterflies? A la https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/head-strong/201404/what-the-military-can-learn-the-peppered-moth

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: ​Academia.edu

Barry MacKichan
In reply to this post by Owen Densmore

I’ve wondered about this also. Let us know if you find any answers. Like Nick, I’ve been on ResearchGate.

--Barry


On 6 May 2017, at 10:47, Owen Densmore wrote:

Does any here use ​Academia.edu​? 

They are maturing slowly but surely and I'm wondering if they're soon to be the LinkedIn for published papers. 

They recently sent an invite to have your own page, and I wondered if it was worth it, or maybe scamy/phishy.

   -- Owen


============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove


============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: ​Academia.edu

Owen Densmore
Administrator
I think "both"? But Academia seems to be "trending" .. i.e. providing better services, being (unlike Google) Slow and Steady wins the race. And offering your own website? Not sure RG does that.

   -- Owen

On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 12:16 PM, Barry MacKichan <[hidden email]> wrote:

I’ve wondered about this also. Let us know if you find any answers. Like Nick, I’ve been on ResearchGate.

--Barry


On 6 May 2017, at 10:47, Owen Densmore wrote:

Does any here use ​Academia.edu​? 

They are maturing slowly but surely and I'm wondering if they're soon to be the LinkedIn for published papers. 

They recently sent an invite to have your own page, and I wondered if it was worth it, or maybe scamy/phishy.

   -- Owen

Inline image 1

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove


============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove


============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: ​Academia.edu

Nick Thompson
In reply to this post by Barry MacKichan

I am going to be REALLY ANNOYED if Academe pulls away from R.G. 

 

N

 

Nicholas S. Thompson

Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Biology

Clark University

http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/

 

From: Friam [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Barry MacKichan
Sent: Friday, May 12, 2017 12:17 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] ​Academia.edu

 

I’ve wondered about this also. Let us know if you find any answers. Like Nick, I’ve been on ResearchGate.

--Barry

 

On 6 May 2017, at 10:47, Owen Densmore wrote:

Does any here use ​Academia.edu​? 

 

They are maturing slowly but surely and I'm wondering if they're soon to be the LinkedIn for published papers. 

 

They recently sent an invite to have your own page, and I wondered if it was worth it, or maybe scamy/phishy.

 

   -- Owen

 

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove


============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: ​Academia.edu​

glen ep ropella
In reply to this post by Gary Schiltz-4

Perhaps this:
http://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/2009-January/058912.html
http://backspaces.net/28/moth-my-way-or-the-highway/

On 05/10/2017 01:59 PM, Gary Schiltz wrote:
> I may have missed part of the thread, but what does MOTH stand for? Or are
> you talking about the psychology of the night time equivalent of
> butterflies? A la
> https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/head-strong/201404/what-the-military-can-learn-the-peppered-moth

--
glen ep ropella ⊥ 971-280-5699

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove