SPEAKER: Carlos Gershenson
Centrum Leo Apostel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel TITLE: A General Methodology for Designing Self-Organizing Systems TIME: Wed May 31, 12:30p LOCATION: 624 Agua Fria Conference Room Lunch will be available for purchase ABSTRACT: Our technologies complexify our environments. Thus, new technologies need to deal with more and more complexity. Several efforts have been made to deal with this complexity using the concept of self-organization. However, in order to promote its use and understanding, we must first have a pragmatic understanding of complexity and self-organization. This paper presents a conceptual framework for speaking about self-organizing systems. The aim is to provide a methodology useful for designing and controlling systems developed to solve complex problems. First, practical notions of complexity and self-organization are given. Then, starting from the agent metaphor, a conceptual framework is presented. This provides formal ways of speaking about "satisfaction" of elements and systems. The main premise of the methodology claims that reducing the "friction" or "interference" of interactions between elements of a system will result in a higher "satisfaction" of the system, i.e. better performance. The methodology discusses different ways in which this can be achieved. A case study on self-organizing traffic lights illustrates the ideas presented in the paper. Full paper: http://uk.arxiv.org/abs/nlin.AO/0505009 |
Is a webcast or video broadcast available for this event ? Or a Macromedia Flash file (.SWF) for all the FRIAMers which can not be present physically ? I have heard you can create Flash files with OpenOffice. Powerpoint slides would be OK, too. -J. |
In reply to this post by Stephen Guerin
Neat, wish I could listen in. Maybe someone could ask a question for
me. "Do these methods address the response time limitations for human responses to change?" Phil Henshaw ????.?? ? `?.???? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 680 Ft. Washington Ave NY NY 10040 tel: 212-795-4844 e-mail: pfh at synapse9.com explorations: www.synapse9.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Friam-bounces at redfish.com > [mailto:Friam-bounces at redfish.com] On Behalf Of Stephen Guerin > Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 3:51 AM > To: friam at redfish.com > Subject: [FRIAM] ** this Wednesday** Lecture May 31 12:30p - > Carlos Gershenson: A General Methodology for Designing > Self-Organizing Systems > > > SPEAKER: Carlos Gershenson > Centrum Leo Apostel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel > > TITLE: A General Methodology for Designing Self-Organizing Systems > > TIME: Wed May 31, 12:30p > LOCATION: 624 Agua Fria Conference Room > > Lunch will be available for purchase > > ABSTRACT: Our technologies complexify our environments. Thus, > new technologies need to deal with more and more complexity. > Several efforts have been made to deal with this complexity > using the concept of self-organization. However, in order to > promote its use and understanding, we must first have a > pragmatic understanding of complexity and self-organization. > This paper presents a conceptual framework for speaking about > self-organizing systems. The aim is to provide a methodology > useful for designing and controlling systems developed to > solve complex problems. First, practical notions of > complexity and self-organization are given. Then, starting > from the agent metaphor, a conceptual framework is presented. > This provides formal ways of speaking about "satisfaction" of > elements and systems. > > The main premise of the methodology claims that reducing the > "friction" or "interference" of interactions between elements > of a system will result in a higher "satisfaction" of the > system, i.e. better performance. The methodology discusses > different ways in which this can be achieved. A case study on > self-organizing traffic lights illustrates the ideas > presented in the paper. > > Full paper: http://uk.arxiv.org/abs/nlin.AO/0505009 > > > ============================================================ > FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv > Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College > lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org > > |
In reply to this post by Jochen Fromm-3
Jochen,
We'll record Carlos's talk and post to friam.org. -S > -----Original Message----- > From: Jochen Fromm [mailto:fromm at vs.uni-kassel.de] > Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 2:55 AM > To: 'The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group' > Subject: Re: [FRIAM] ** this Wednesday** Lecture May 31 > 12:30p - CarlosGershenson: A General Methodology for > DesigningSelf-Organizing Systems > > > Is a webcast or video broadcast available for this event ? > Or a Macromedia Flash file (.SWF) for all the FRIAMers which > can not be present physically ? I have heard you can create > Flash files with OpenOffice. Powerpoint slides would be OK, too. > > -J. > > > ============================================================ > FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv > Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College > lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org > > |
In reply to this post by Phil Henshaw-2
Hi Phil,
> "Do these methods address the response time limitations for human > responses to change?" The answer is yes. Self-organizing systems are precisely useful for that, since elements of the system try to find solutions to a problem by themselves, without human intervention, so they help reduce human- induced delays. If there's a change in the environment, the elements reconfigure to find the solution for the current situation. Best regards, Carlos Gershenson... Centrum Leo Apostel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel Krijgskundestraat 33. B-1160 Brussels, Belgium http://homepages.vub.ac.be/~cgershen/ ?Tendencies tend to change...? |
Well, yes, that's the advantage of creative homeostatic systems like the
global economy. The question, though, is whether pushing such a system to grow exponentially toward critical response time failure is dangerous or not. I think homeostasis is quite dangerous in collapse, and it could easily precipitate a systemic failure in which virtually all systems fail at once. Historically the world system has been kind of loose and with system instability we suffered a bit, changed our model and kept on growing. The question that tests our practical knowledge of nature is whether we can do that indefinitely. I think we have not yet looked to see what growth is for in nature, just assumed it was some kind of divine right or something, and that our remarkable ignorance is hiding big surprises. I do systems design too, designs for government competence, self-correcting health care, etc. There's most certainly a need. Are your models designs for adaptive business systems or something? Phil Henshaw ????.?? ? `?.???? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 680 Ft. Washington Ave NY NY 10040 tel: 212-795-4844 e-mail: pfh at synapse9.com explorations: www.synapse9.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Carlos Gershenson [mailto:cgershen at gmail.com] On Behalf > Of Carlos Gershenson > Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 8:19 PM > To: sy at synapse9.com; The Friday Morning Applied Complexity > Coffee Group > Cc: stephen.guerin at redfish.com > Subject: Re: [FRIAM] ** this Wednesday** Lecture May 31 > 12:30p - Carlos Gershenson: A General Methodology for > Designing Self-Organizing Systems > > > Hi Phil, > > > "Do these methods address the response time limitations for human > > responses to change?" > > The answer is yes. Self-organizing systems are precisely useful for > that, since elements of the system try to find solutions to a > problem > by themselves, without human intervention, so they help reduce human- > induced delays. If there's a change in the environment, the elements > reconfigure to find the solution for the current situation. > > Best regards, > > Carlos Gershenson... > Centrum Leo Apostel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel > Krijgskundestraat 33. B-1160 Brussels, Belgium > http://homepages.vub.ac.be/~cgershen/ > > ?Tendencies tend to change...? > > > |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |