Posted by
Prof David West on
Feb 19, 2021; 3:41pm
URL: http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/Watch-Mars-landing-this-afternoon-tp7600834p7600851.html
A "market" found in aboriginal Australia and the South Pacific:
1- the two sides never spoke, only one side was "in the market" at any given time.
2- side A put out piles of the goods(A) they wanted to trade then leave.
3- side B would place their trade goods(B) near the goods(A) they wished to purchase, then leave.
4-Side A would remove piles that had no goods(B) and factor the goods(A) piles into smaller lots, then leave.
5-Side B would add good(B) to the smaller good(A) piles.
4-5 would continue until there was no change in the good(A) and good(B) piles — indicating that X amount of Good(A) was worth Y amount of Good(B)
No "commonality" of which glen speaks.
Academia does not function as such a market, but I think FRIAM might. Lot's of ideas put out that attract no response while others spawn long threads. This is a kind of "valuation" of the original idea to others on the list.
davew
On Thu, Feb 18, 2021, at 2:29 PM, uǝlƃ ↙↙↙ wrote:
> IDK, my joke response earlier was intended to say that I can't parse
> "market of ideas". A market requires some common measure (e.g.
> currency) to which everything is reduced and with which the things are
> bought and sold. If it's a market, what is that measure? You could make
> an argument that the measure need not be a reduction ... like some sort
> of barter. But there would still need to be some commonality, perhaps a
> language like English. And my guess is each idea domain has its own
> jargon, which implies the domains would all need to be
> inter-translatable ... and that would require some discussion of how
> isomorphic the languages are.
>
> I'd argue part of why Nick thinks Sober is a tourist is because their
> languages don't match very well. Hence, either it's not a market or
> these 2 traders are bad at trading ... or somesuch.
>
> On 2/18/21 12:44 PM,
[hidden email] wrote:
> > I would think the metaphor is quite precise, since the same force that
> > distorts a commercial market place -- accrued power -- also distorts an
> > academic one. I guess you might say -- I might say -- that when Sober
> > publishes in a behavior journal, he is using his power in one domain --
> > philosophy of biology -- to tour in another. To make that case I would
> > have to show that the argument he makes is not only shabby in behavioral
> > terms, but no reason to claim that behavioral presuppositions are
> > inconsistent with more general principles of science. A heavy lift?
> >
> > Nick Thompson
> >
[hidden email]
> >
https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Friam <
[hidden email]> On Behalf Of jon zingale
> > Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2021 1:37 PM
> > To:
[hidden email]
> > Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Watch Mars landing this afternoon
> >
> > Speaking of efficiency, to what extent is it fair to consider academia an
> > efficient market of ideas? To the degree that it is, would this justify
> > conceptual tourism?
>
> --
> ↙↙↙ uǝlƃ
>
> - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam
> un/subscribe
http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com> FRIAM-COMIC
http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/> archives:
http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/>
- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam
un/subscribe
http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.comFRIAM-COMIC
http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/archives:
http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/