Login  Register

Re: it's world logic day!

Posted by thompnickson2 on Jan 14, 2021; 7:33pm
URL: http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/it-s-world-logic-day-tp7600254p7600268.html

"if it was so, it might be; and if it were so, it would be; but as it isn't, it ain't. That's logic."

 

Oh, surely this is a more heterodox definition than the one I offered. 

 

Glen, I have to say this:  You are at least as arrogant as I am, and I love you for it

 

So there,

 

Nick

 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Friam <[hidden email]> On Behalf Of u?l? ???
Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2021 1:26 PM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] it's world logic day!

 

I tend to follow the standard diagnostic caveat that some thing isn't a problem until/unless it *interferes* with one's daily activities. And the dose is the poison. Arrogance (or over-confidence), as Jon pointed out one time can be quite useful and appropriate in some circumstances. (I don't find it "endearing". But I admit it can be useful.) But when it interferes with your understanding, as your insistence about your understanding of logic *does*, then it's inappropriate and not useful.

 

You are debilitating yourself by this particular over-confidence. I don't think Merle is in the same boat. But I don't have time to respond to her contribution just yet.

 

E.g. here's my favorite definition of logic: "if it was so, it might be; and if it were so, it would be; but as it isn't, it ain't. That's logic."

 

On 1/14/21 10:43 AM, [hidden email] wrote:

> My definition arises from a logician, perhaps the foremost American logician.  I just did a quick run though some dictionary definitions of "logic", and the one I offer does not seem to be particularly exceptional.  I wonder if the "celebratory" announcement was even written by a logician, given that it left out the evaluation at the core of saying that an argument is "logical".   Finally, I am startled to be hauled before the court of FRIAM on the grounds of "arrogance".  I would have thought that arrogance was our most endearing feature.  Each of us -- including you, my friend -- feels qualified to re-examine any doctrine, no matter how authoritative and time-honored.  We are the little lad in the fable THE EMPEROR'S NEW CLOTHES.  I would not have it otherwise.  Would you?

 

 

--

↙↙↙ uǝlƃ

 

- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .

FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv

Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com

archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/

FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/


- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/