Re: Climate Science Denial: A rational activity built on incoherence and conspiracy theories | HotWhopper

Posted by gepr on Nov 26, 2020; 12:49am
URL: http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/Climate-Science-Denial-A-rational-activity-built-on-incoherence-and-conspiracy-theories-HotWhopper-tp7599638p7599649.html

Well, at least we got rid of requirement #3. But I maintain that your requirement for logic is too ambiguous to defend. So if you'd drop that, we'd agree that "facts" are the only requirement for productive dialogue.


On November 25, 2020 4:11:33 PM PST, [hidden email] wrote:
>Thou strawmanest me!
>
>If I am guilty of tautology it is believing that an argument is the
>offering of facts and logic (of some sort) in the hope of changing
>another's mind, or even receiving counter arguments that will change
>one's own.

--
glen ⛧

- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/