Re: constructionism, textualism, and originalism

Posted by gepr on Oct 19, 2020; 1:55pm
URL: http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/constructionism-textualism-and-originalism-tp7598797p7599197.html


Amy Coney Barrett's "originalist" doctrine may sound good — but it's
incoherent
https://www.salon.com/2020/10/19/amy-coney-barretts-originalist-doctrine-may-sound-good--but-its-completely-incoherent/

Merely more fodder for "methods".

On Wed, 23 Sep 2020 06:39:13 -0400
David Eric Smith <[hidden email]> wrote:

> I don’t know how one defines it as a method, but the approach I
> usually hear contrasted with Originalism comes associated with
> “living document” language.

- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/