Re: deductive fidelity (was Re: ideas are lies)

Posted by gepr on Sep 29, 2020; 7:04pm
URL: http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/ideas-are-lies-tp7598884p7598911.html

Well, part of any data-driven policy would be rolling them back as well as enacting them. To that end, before enacting it, we'd have to define conditions that would trigger its rollback. E.g. when cars get airbags and are driven automatically by credible algorithms, rollback the seatbelt law. When we install universal basic income and poverty levels go below a given mark, rollback some entitlements. Etc.

On 9/29/20 11:16 AM, Marcus Daniels wrote:
> Don't wish something is true about people, insist upon it.    Say, if people don't wear their seat belt:  If they are injured in an accident, they need to be left to die.   Don't say social security is a good idea, set it aside; make the money unreachable.   IIRC, this is how it is done in Japan.


--
↙↙↙ uǝlƃ

- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/