Re: detritus from vFRIAM

Posted by thompnickson2 on
URL: http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/detritus-from-vFRIAM-tp7597543p7597544.html

In other words, there is some sense in which the notion of Self-serving Action is incoherent.

 

Nicholas Thompson

Emeritus Professor of Ethology and Psychology

Clark University

[hidden email]

https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/

 

 

From: [hidden email] <[hidden email]>
Sent: Friday, July 3, 2020 1:07 PM
To: 'The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group' <[hidden email]>
Subject: detritus from vFRIAM

 

I tried to post this on the vFRIAM chat, but wouldn’t “take”, so I am posting it here:

 

“Don't do this now, but …. as a favor to me, could you-guys devote some of your shaving time this week to the proposition: "No system ever acts on its own behalf."  My intuition is that whenever we investigate a system that appears to act in its own behalf, we will find that it is pursuing a goal that is short of the interest of the whole, but which will produce benefits to the whole because of some property of the world in which it acts.  I would love to hear a discussion among people trying to design a system that acts on its own behalf. Can someone come up with a simple example of such a system.” 

 

I grant you that the question is not clear.

 

Thanks,

 

Nick

 

Nicholas Thompson

Emeritus Professor of Ethology and Psychology

Clark University

[hidden email]

https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/

 

 

 


- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/