Re: Pragmaticism and puritanism

Posted by Marcus G. Daniels on
URL: http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/Pragmaticism-and-puritanism-tp7594748p7594761.html

Temporary refrigeration for some FRIAM members?  Just until it all blows over?  

On 3/11/20, 9:30 AM, "Friam on behalf of [hidden email]" <[hidden email] on behalf of [hidden email]> wrote:

    Hi Dave,
   
    Well, at the very least, the kind of information that would convince me to take a somewhat dodgy drug to fend off covid19.  
   
    N
   
    Nicholas Thompson
    Emeritus Professor of Ethology and Psychology
    Clark University
    [hidden email]
    https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/
     
   
   
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Friam <[hidden email]> On Behalf Of Prof David West
    Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2020 9:05 AM
    To: [hidden email]
    Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Pragmaticism and puritanism
   
    May I add — what would convince you that psychedelic experiences are worth of the same kind of investigation as "ordinary" experiences.
   
    davew
   
   
    On Wed, Mar 11, 2020, at 3:18 PM, uǝlƃ ☣ wrote:
    > Well, I definitely privilege scientific ways of knowing more than any
    > other way of knowing [†]. So I don't disagree with what you *say*. But
    > it seems to me that *you* don't privilege scientific knowledge in
    > these discussions. You talk a LOT about philosophy and metaphysics,
    > but not much about scientific results. The recent 'round and 'round
    > about "sledgehammers", Peirce's metaphysics, or whatnot, largely
    > ignoring any attempts to discuss psychedelic research and medicine,
    > seems to imply that you do not privilege science.
    >
    > So, maybe if I pull out the old saw again?  If results published in
    > peer-reviewed literature and clinical trial data will NOT convince you
    > that psychedelics can be used as medicine, then what WOULD convince
    > you? If nothing will ever convince you, then you certainly do NOT
    > privilege science.
    >
    >
    > [†] It ain't perfect; and it ain't the only kind of knowledge. But
    > it's the best we have.
    >
    > On 3/10/20 11:03 AM, [hidden email] wrote:
    > > No, I am not sure that Dave and Glen would disagree with any of this.
    >
    > --
    > ☣ uǝlƃ
    >
    > ============================================================
    > FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe
    > at St. John's College to unsubscribe
    > http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
    > archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
    > FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
    >
   
    ============================================================
    FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
    Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
    archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
    FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
   
   
    ============================================================
    FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
    Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
    to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
    archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
    FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
   

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove