Frank has been unfairly accused. His was an Anti-Rant Quip.
The material Roger cites doesn’t obviously relate (for me) to Frank’s and my standing argument about the efficacy of inner life. But its themes, continuity and anti-determinism, are Peirceian themes. And my respect for Roger is such that I know that he don’t never say somethin’ for nothin’. So, can somebody explicate? Perhaps even Roger?
NIck
Nicholas S. Thompson
Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Biology
Clark University
http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/
From: Friam [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Frank Wimberly
Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2019 12:20 AM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] a problem in how we think, not just in how we act
Rant??
I am a proponent, in human affairs, of both/and rather than either/or propositions. In math I use the law of the excluded middle, however.
Frank
-----------------------------------
Frank Wimberly
My memoir:
https://www.amazon.com/author/frankwimberly
My scientific publications:
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Frank_Wimberly2
Phone (505) 670-9918
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019, 10:08 PM Roger Critchlow <[hidden email]> wrote: