It's not clear to me that the intent of that dependency project is to concatenate proofs. Is that what you guys think it's purpose is? It seems, to me, more like a reliability analysis, where the trustworthiness of any component depends (to a greater or lesser) extent on the trustworthiness of its parts ... weakest link of the (inferential) chain and all that. I've seen the misapplication of various numerical solutions throughout my career. And one of the important aspects of applying any given algorithm is the assurance that its inputs satisfy whatever requirements/assumptions are necessary for the output to be trustworthy. This seems similar.
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
by Dr. Strangelove