Good news, your mind hasn’t been damaged by the popular programming languages.
http://learnyouahaskell.com/
From: Friam <[hidden email]> on behalf of Nick Thompson <[hidden email]>
Reply-To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <[hidden email]>
Date: Wednesday, January 9, 2019 at 3:56 PM
To: 'The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group' <[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Motives - Was Abduction
Hi, Marcus,
This is the kind of comment that makes me which I knew more about … um … what it is you do. I get these intimations that your experience might be very useful to philosophical cogitations if only I could share
it.
Nick
Nicholas S. Thompson
Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Biology
Clark University
From: Friam [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of
Marcus Daniels
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2019 2:10 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Motives - Was Abduction
Nick writes:
< One solution I am exploring is trying to make every assertion that something is real into a three valued assertion including point of view. >
Confounding variables, like your example with Simpson’s Paradox. In functional programming, the life history of said person’s evolving point of view might live in a monad (a big object). Every assertion could be bind inside the monad
and access private information. Sometimes the assertions would fail, but it would fail in a subjective way.
Marcus
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |