Hi, Glen,
Rushing now, so no time to answer properly. Only time to taunt you.
So: What is it exactly for an experience to "pass as reality".
Nick
Nicholas S. Thompson
Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Biology
Clark University
http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/
-----Original Message-----
From: Friam [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of u?l? ?
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2018 4:06 PM
To: FriAM <[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] On old question
On 10/24/18 2:58 PM, Nick Thompson wrote:
> First of all, the a priori distinction between the real and the modeling world is indefensible.
As a person who *simulates* the real world for money, that's just plain offensive! 8^) Were I to go into, say, NASA or somewhere and claim that my simulations are *indistinguishable* from the real world, I'd be unable to make a living. So, the distinction is not only defensible, but necessary. In fact, I'd argue the opposite. It's parsimonious to *assume* the distinction and the burden of proof is on the simulant to show that a simulacrum is similar enough to pass as reality.
--
☣ uǝlƃ
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |