http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/Any-non-biological-complex-systems-tp7589731p7589787.html
Greetings from Jerusalem! Quite an amazing city. Never been here before. Quite an amazing discussion too.
My interest, I think, is not so much in defining what we (want to) mean by a complex system buy in exploring the implications of systems consisting of agents as described earlier. The ability to process symbols seems to me to make all the difference in the world.
Physical entities capable of processing symbols seem to me to live it two worlds: the physical and the symbolic. (The original question was prompted by the notion that complexity requires that sort of dual worldness. But that's not my core concern. You can probably get pretty far wrt complexity in a world that includes switches, where by a switch I mean one energy flow that controls another, a light switch for example. So systems of multiple energy flows where one controls another like weather and geology are good candidates.)
Symbolic processing, including computers, is a step beyond switches. Half a century ago Newell and Simon defined computers as physical symbol machines. We and many biological organisms are physical symbol machines also. I think that's an important way to look at it.
The thing about physical symbol machines is that the rules of causation they follow are more complex than those of physics.
That's enough rambling for now on my cell phone.
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
by Dr. Strangelove