Login  Register

Re: Fwd: TED talk

Posted by Marcus G. Daniels on Nov 18, 2016; 4:17pm
URL: http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/Fwd-TED-talk-tp7588295p7588309.html

"Your numbers below may provide some justification for a (slightly) increased performance for those who consider a larger space of possibilities."

You might think the effect would be less, adjusting for population by respective state, but actually the reverse is true:

  Clinton       meanPerCapita2015
      0    50.08945
      1    65.10534

(units: billions of dollars / millions of people)

"But there are confounding factors that can't all be chalked up to that core ability/preference.  For example, we could argue (as Haidt does) that we're all parochial, but some of us (simply) stumble into or are born into different influences.  E.g. someone born near a large city with cheap flights overseas will be much more likely to travel widely.  So, they're still parochial, just with a different set of impinging influence.  The same could be said of people born in a place like Wyoming.  We could say that none of us _are_ parochial in any sense; we just seem that way because of our history/ontogeny."

I am not convinced for two reasons:

1) I grew up in the country and only traveled because my parents felt it was important.  I saw the major eastern cities of the United States and some in Europe before I was an adult.  Most of my childhood friends did not have had this experience.  

2) If people have the ability to follow @realDonaldTrump (i.e. they have access to the Internet), they have the means to follow other things too, and geographic isolation is less relevant than it once was.

I selected the word `parochial' because Haidt did, and to play along with that point of view.   I would have chosen a word like `reactionary'.   Even Bannon seems to know that his ilk can't use economics to justify their BS.   (Note how he pivots to terms like "Civic Society".)

http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2016/11/steve-bannon-racist-comments-silicon-valley-inaccurate

I understand that social scientists need to step back, even to biochemistry sometimes, to model things.   I'm not coming at this from that perspective.  I'm coming at this as a member of the accused set of `elites' that the mighty whitelash mob complains about.   So, to deal directly and fairly, mind-to-mind, what basis do we have to negotiate?  Money and productivity, for starters..  

Marcus
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove