Posted by
Marcus G. Daniels on
URL: http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/re-the-French-and-Furriners-tp7585975p7585986.html
Russ Abbott quoted the New Yorker:
> In other words, you can ridicule the prophet, but you cannot incite
> hatred toward his followers. To take two more examples, the actress
> Brigitte Bardot was convicted and fined for having written, in 2006,
> about France’s Muslims, “We are tired of being led around by the nose
> by this population that is destroying our country.” Meanwhile, the
> writer Michel Houellebecq (whose new novel was featured in the issue
> of Charlie Hebdo that came out just before the attack) was brought up
> on charges, but acquitted, for having said in an interview that Islam
> “is the stupidest religion.” Bardot was clearly directing hostility
> toward Muslim people, and was thus found guilty, while Houellebecq was
> criticizing their religion, which is blasphemous, but not a crime, in
> France.
>
This makes me think of historian Ian Morris... That war is good because
it puts violence in the hands of governments, rather than in
individuals. In doing so, it greatly reduces it as rules and technology,
etc. need to be created for its use. (Of course, governments do not
necessarily do this because it is a good thing, but just because they
need to keep power.)
And the legal distinction above seems like it can only be about
maintaining order. Free speech is all fine and good in principle, but
don't think for a second it means any thing in practice in particular
cases. Another pacification tactic.. Get it out of your system and then
put it away.
Marcus
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe
http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com