Re: meritocracy (was Re: Openness amplifies Inequality?)
Posted by
Eric Charles-2 on
Apr 22, 2014; 11:30pm
URL: http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/Fwd-Major-bug-called-Heartbleed-exposes-Internet-data-tp7585135p7585287.html
Merle,
I'm not sure how that questions about "democracy" and questions about "meritocracy" are necessarily related. If I was to pick a historic example that most tried to do meritocracy, it would be imperial china, several hundred years ago. Certainly there was an elite class, but there was also incredible potential for social mobility because there were state run tests that allowed people to move into and to move up within the civil service. Of course such tests favored parents who could afford tutors, etc., but nobody cared because the function of tutors was to turn kids into more meritorious adults.
Nick,
I'm not sure we need too much ontological baggage to do the meritocracy game. What we do need is an agreement about the circumstances that we find ourselves in... once we get that, we just look for those who are best fit. ;- )
The biggest hindrance I see to the meritocracy game is that ultimately we will want people with a wide variety of merits (i.e., who exercise skills well-matched to a variety of circumstances). Of course, I know you agree with that (and have written about it at some point).
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe
http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com