Posted by
glen ropella on
Feb 13, 2014; 9:40pm
URL: http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/NTY-Buy-Apple-gadgets-use-Google-services-buy-media-from-Amazon-tp7584915p7584918.html
TL;DR -- but you asked...
Well, I was being purposefully provocative, of course. When serious, I
advocate agnosticism. Use everything as often as you can.
For me, it's less about diversity and more about core skills. In my
experience (which is admittedly peculiar), the primary skill is the
ability to try something out, figure out the basic use cases, then move
on to the next tool. If your purpose is to get something done, then use
the first tool you try/learn that actually works. Do the job; move on.
If, however, your purpose is to understand, then use as many tools as
you can, taken to the extent of some predefined test.
RE: platforms. It seems to me platforms are primarily a way to avoid
learning, especially the more closed they are. Ease of use is the bogey
man. It's the scapegoat upon which all platform closures hang their
debt to society. This is why I cringe when I hear things like "They
[Apple's devices] are also the easiest to learn to use and the most
durable." This is antithetic to what I would teach a child. If you
always/only use the easiest tools to use, then you're only hurting
yourself. And you're setting yourself up to be exploited by nefarious
agents.
Sure, it's OK to (mostly) use easy to use tools... but only AFTER you've
become at least adequate at using the other tools in the same domain.
(In fact, anyone who claims something like OS X is the easiest or most
intuitive OS is just ASKING to be grilled about, say, the difference
between Gnome 3 and Unity. And if they show _any_ hint that they know
those aren't operating systems, then we get to grill them on Plan 9 or
the Hurd ... or maybe VMS if I'm feeling generous.) My point being that
ubiquity = ignorance.
If I were to try to write it down, it would read more like a book for
kindergarten. Pay attention. Poke everything that looks like it'll do
something when you poke it. Don't be afraid to break it. Actually, try
to break it. You learn more about a thing by learning what breaks it
than by doing what it's supposed to do. ("Bending" is the real
cognitive target, of course.
http://www.moogfest.com/circuit-bending)
You learn even more if you try to fix it after you broke it.
Anyway, my main point is that if you want to "survive" the next "mass
extinction" event, learn the _domains_ and their use cases. The
devices/tools that implement the use cases are interchangeable and
largely irrelevant.
On 02/13/2014 11:49 AM, Owen Densmore wrote:
> Good points. But diversity? Do you buy into that?
>
> I certainly use services outside of Google. Twitter mainly (have but don't
> use Facebook) but many forums which are not Google Groups.
>
> I try to use cross platform apps where possible. Sublime, for example, as
> a text editor. Chrome/Firefox. Terminal w/ standard CLI. Dropbox
> (mac/windows/linux) for files. iOS apps that are cross platform for the
> most part, although my cant-live-without-it Italian dictionary is iOS only
> and they tell me that it's the best choice for their market. Possibly iOS
> folks are more willing to pay? They seemed sincere.
>
> The article was about survival in a limited extent: how to deal with being
> jerked around by the demise of a popular service or platform.
>
> How do you deal with it? Could you teach a non-techie to follow your lead?
> Would write down a simpler set of rules that are easy to follow?
--
⇒⇐ glen
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe
http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com