Re: Live Q&A with Edward Snowden: Thursday 23rd January, 8pm GMT, 3pm EST

Posted by Gary Schiltz-4 on Jan 26, 2014; 11:20pm
URL: http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/Live-Q-A-with-Edward-Snowden-Thursday-23rd-January-8pm-GMT-3pm-EST-tp7584887p7584900.html

You obviously have no future in politics, my friend (nor do most of us here, I’m proud to say).

:-)

On Jan 26, 2014, at 6:16 PM, Owen Densmore <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Well, if you were to read the content of the thread, it reminds me of an occasional theme that also occurs here.  It's the notion that conversations about philosophy are stupid and technical topics are substantive.
>
> As a possible target of having that sentiment, I'd like to be clear that I don't hold it.
>
> What I do object to are the traps of:
> - Deadly Embrace: The idea that if we only go at it long enough, we'll agree somehow.  In math, convergence.  Judging from the length of this type of thread, I think they are divergent.
> - Semantic Arguments: Endless fine points on the meaning of the words and goal of the conversation.
> - Ill Defined: This actually is less a problem as we tend to notice the ill defined discussions and correct.  But it is annoying.  As I am :)
> - TL;DR: I'd prefer long posts to be in two parts, as is becoming standard on the web: summarize in a paragraph or two the core of the discussion, followed by "TL;DR" (Too Long; Didn't Read), followed by the detail, especially when difficult to separate the wheat from the chaff.
>
> There, that's not so bad is it?
>
>    -- Owen

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com