Posted by
Steve Smith on
Nov 10, 2013; 4:37am
URL: http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/11-American-Nations-tp7584250p7584258.html
Ray -
I agree that (especially with Woodard's attempt to address the Tea
Party directly) his biases do show, but I would still contend that
while "tainted" by that, his general structure is far from invalidated.
Can you provide an alternative geo-political structuring or
modifications to his that you believe are more accurate (or even align
with your own biases better)?
I'm much less interested in the conclusions that Woodard draws from his
framework than the reframing of the conversation it implies. I'm very
tired of the traditional Blue/Grey, Rural/Urban, Coastal/Heartland,
North/South, East/West divisions.... they have their place but do not
suffice to explain a lot and seem to serve mainly to keep us high-centered.
- Steve
PS Response to StephenT in progress...
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe
http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com