Re: PRISM/AP kerfluffle, etc
Posted by
Roger Critchlow-2 on
URL: http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/The-AP-kerfuffle-tp7583146p7583440.html
This article points out some of the real fun:
So several months ago the DOJ got a suit by the usual anti-surveillance do-gooders dismissed in the SCOTUS by arguing that the do-gooders had no standing to sue, only someone who's actually being tried by the USGOVT based on or derived from surveillance evidence had the standing to challenge the constitutionality of the surveillance. The majority opinion parrotted the DOJ's argument.
Now, the DOJ is arguing in court cases that those being tried by the USGOVT have no right to challenge the constitutionality of the surveillance, either.
-- rec --
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe
http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com