Posted by
glen ropella on
URL: http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/How-do-forces-work-tp7582853p7582931.html
On 04/22/2013 06:53 PM, Steve Smith wrote:
> And is it possible that this neurological structure literally co-evolved
> with language itself? [...] How much does sharing some
> basic language (structure?) get involved in empathic understanding?
Yes, it's entirely possible that they happened to evolve together. But
it may not be necessary that they will/would always evolve together.
Personally, I think sharing basic language _requires_ the ability to
empathize, to put yourself in another's position. Without that ability,
we devolve into silly arguments like the Chinese room or the existence
of consciousness-less zombies.
> What I think we are both talking about is: 1) Taking a(n educated?)
> guess that involves causal relations; 2) Formulating a way to test this
> guess by *doing something*; 3) Doing something; 4) Observing the
> results; 5) Recording the results; 6) repeat any/all of 1,2,3,4,5
> until 5 matches 1 (excluding the obvious cheat of simply adjusting 5 to
> match 1, also practiced for the purpose of gaining future funding but
> generally frowned upon)
> [...]
> Hypothesis generation and testing combined with repeatability (by
> others) is all I mean by "the Scientific Method". I think you do too?
I don't include hypothesis generation. We could classify scientists
into different types, at least "minimal" vs. "sophisticated". And if we
did that, then the sophisticated ones would develop clear hypotheses and
then test them with a reality-bifurcating experiment. But I think there
are "street scientists" who spend their lives bifurcating reality
without ever pausing to yap about what they've demonstrated. And to
keep the conversation simple, it is my intention to focus on these
"minimal" scientists.
Well, the point of the conversation I wanted to have was about science
WITHOUT language, if such is possible. If you have a way to show me how
a hypothesis can be an _action_ as opposed to a thought or something
that's is primarily represented in written or spoken form, then we can
talk about a "science" that includes non-lingual hypotheses and, of
course, non-lingual experimentation.
--
glen =><= Hail Eris!
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe
http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com