http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/pluralism-in-science-tp7582640p7582680.html
Obviously happiness is a tensor--an ABM simulating this would sure help us figure out how to get there.
> Ron-
>> Here's the link to the Christakis/Fowler paper on happiness contagion I mentioned earlier...and a TEDx talk.
> Thanks... I was being a little flip when I suggested all this, but I'm glad to see that there *is* work tied in already underway.
>> Are they building off of Epstein's work? He's not mentioned in the citations.
> I doubt it. I think we are talking somewhat separated paradigms. I suspect there *could* be a tie in with some work, but I can tell already that Doug is not going to be our Emissary over beer and ribs... <grin>.
>
> I have worked on two projects that tie in to Fowler's talk and his referencing of the Digital Village.
>
> One was an early days(public) internet project ( entitled "Digital Village", no kidding) to try to understand how the growing participation in the internet of the first and third world population might change the nature of these populations. I don't remember any amazing results, I seem to remember that the project was overcome by events such that we were running on pre-internet time trying to keep up with the actual progress of the internet. A related project I think was to try to help the USPS anticipate what the internet was going to mean to them... and what they could do to remain relevant as the digital age overwhelmed the atom-age.
>
> The other was a paper on "Collective Intelligence" Circa 2001 which involved some simple simulations to demonstrate that a connected group could have more problem-solving ability than any individual (or small subset?).
>
> A lot of my research and contribution overlaps a lot of what Fowler is saying in his TED talk... in particular our evolutionary roots as nomadic tribal groups of order 100... and the potential implications for our (future) social networks when they are no longer geographically, familial, or job constrained.
>
> I'm mildly disturbed by his verbage in the talk which seems to conflate correlation with causation (are obese friends on facebook actually influencing the others to become (more) obese or are they choosing eachother because they are obese, or do obese people share common interests (love food and sedentary pursuits while eschewing physical activities?). I realize it is a popular talk jammed into a short period of time... I'll get more out of the paper I'm sure.
>
> I'm also interested in whether "Happiness" is considered a scalar, a vector or even a tensor? And if there are iterated network models (roughly ABMs or Network Automata) trying to simulate this?
>
> So much for trying to be flip. Now I'm hooked (a little).
>
> Happily hooked?
> - Steve
> ============================================================
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
> to unsubscribe
http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.comMeets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College