Doug
You read me wrong. I found it uninteresting, but assumed that if it interested you there MUST b e a reason, and that if I knew the reason, I, too, would find it interesting.
Where we seem to disagree is on one of my most fundatmental ideas: if somebody finds something interesting, there must be an underlying question or issue to which the phenomenon has gotten attached in their mind that I WOULD find interesting if I knew it.
I was asking you to expand my experience.
Or not.
Nick
From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Douglas Roberts
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 5:09 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] So, *Are* We Alone?
<Lilke>
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 5:06 PM, Bruce Sherwood <[hidden email]> wrote:
Uh, does there have to be a reason? I'm interested just because I am
-- a portion of trying to understand as much about the Universe we
inhabit as is possible.
To put it another way: Why are you interested in the details of the
definition or use of induction? I found that discussion massively
uninteresting and irrelevant to the actual practice of science. There
are many variants of philistinism, and of engagement.
Bruce
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Nicholas Thompson
<[hidden email]> wrote:
============================================================
--
Doug Roberts
[hidden email]
[hidden email]
505-455-7333 - Office
505-670-8195 - Cell
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |