Posted by
glen ep ropella on
Jul 08, 2011; 12:43am
URL: http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/The-Grand-Design-Philosophy-is-Dead-and-Hubris-tp6559131p6560583.html
[hidden email] wrote at 07/07/2011 03:21 PM:
> all that a
> measurement can do (and it's quite enough, and sometimes--very likely
> in this case--both intriguing and well worth celebrating), with
> regard to a philosophical stance, is provide evidence (possibly,
> as you seem to me to suggest here, categorical evidence) that the
> philosophical stance S and the theory T in which the measurement
> is embedded are incompatible
You have to be careful saying things like that on this list, though,
because it's tantamount to giving philosophical stances a stature on par
with scientific theories. OMG!
Personally, I think philosophy is on par with science. But they are in
two different categories. Science is limited to negation, the
demonstration that some sentence (or class of sentences) does not hold
(here, now, anywhere, anywhen). Philosophy is limited to inference, the
derivation of sentences from others (ab-, in-, or de-). Both are
necessary for any attempt at knowledge.
Perhaps Hawking and Mlodinow meant to say that "metaphysics is dead",
which would be a much more appropriate assertion for people who study
the physical stories that are steadily replacing our creation myths.
--
glen e. p. ropella, 971-222-9095,
http://tempusdictum.com============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at
http://www.friam.org