recap on Rosen

Posted by Joost Rekveld on
URL: http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/Welcome-Jim-tp526087p526101.html

Hi Ken,

thanks for this, i'll report back to base as soon as I'm done reading  
(which might take a while)

ciao,

Joost.


On  21 Apr, 2008, at 10:12 PM, Ken Lloyd wrote:

> Hi Joost,
>
> Here's a case study.  Notice how the concept of a geometrical space  
> can be equated to a "context" in which patterns evolve, and see how  
> this differs from its primitive cousin - an evolutionary genetic ANN.
>
> http://eplex.cs.ucf.edu/papers/gauci_aaai08.pdf
>
> Ken
>
> =============================
> Kenneth A. Lloyd
> CEO and Director of Systems Science
> Watt Systems Technologies Inc.
> Albuquerque, NM USA
> kalloyd at wattsys.com
> kenneth.lloyd at incose.org  - MBSE Complex, Adaptive & Stochastic  
> Systems
> kenneth.lloyd at nmug.net - Director of Education
> www.wattsys.com
>
> http://www.linkedin.com/pub/7/9a/824
>
> This e-mail is intended only for the addressee named above. It may  
> contain privileged or confidential information.
> If you are not the addressee you must not copy, distribute,  
> disclose or use any of the information in it.
> If you have received it in error please delete it and immediately  
> notify the sender.
>
>
> From: friam-bounces at redfish.com [mailto:friam-bounces at redfish.com]  
> On Behalf Of Joost Rekveld
> Sent: Monday, April 21, 2008 1:54 PM
> To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
> Subject: Re: [FRIAM] recap on Rosen
>
> Hi Ken,
>
> in the context of Rosen's objections to course of mathematics since  
> pythagoras, in what respect would CPPN's be any better than 'rules  
> centered agent based modelling' ?
> I never heard about CPPN's; it seems interesting, but I can't  
> really find any examples of something they're better at than  
> 'straight' CA or neural networks ?
>
> curious,
>
> Joost.
>
>
> On  21 Apr, 2008, at 5:29 PM, Ken Lloyd wrote:
>> Phil,
>>
>> There is a fundamental quality in mathematics - equality - or  
>> reversibility,
>> if you will, that differs from nature.  This means that there is a
>> directionality in natural processes that cannot be deconstructed.  
>> Prigogine
>> calls the lack of directional and temporal equality "far from  
>> equilibrium".
>>
>> Mathematics works well at describing systems at equilibrium, and  
>> seems to
>> get progressively worse the further from equilibrium one gets.  
>> Emergence
>> creates an emergency, so to speak.
>>
>> This has been my criticism of rules centered agent based modeling,  
>> which is
>> a theme from Wolfram, and why I have been researching  
>> compositional pattern
>> producing networks (CPPN's) evolved by HyperNEAT.  It seems to  
>> take energy
>> to evolve.
>>
>> The interesting thing is a paradigmatic difference between solving  
>> problems,
>> and recognizing solutions.
>>
>> Ken
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------
>
>                               Joost Rekveld
> -----------    http://www.lumen.nu/rekveld
>
> -------------------------------------------
>
> "A is better off if B is better off.?
>
> (Heinz von Foerster)
>
> -------------------------------------------
>
> ============================================================
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
> lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/attachments/20080421/dab66745/attachment.html