http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/What-have-the-Romans-sorry-complexity-done-for-us-tp522232p522234.html
You beat me to it Mike. I was re-reading Kuhn this morning because I'm
cleverer than me. I'll report back on my readings...
represented in the new textbooks that accompany the paradigm shift. I'm
>
> Well, there's the roads, yeah, and then there's the...
>
> Romans are the right metaphor, since much of what's happened in the
> last X years has been diffusion of ideas--ideas, not measures--into
> numerous different domains. Like Kuhn said...
>
> Mike
>
>
> On Jul 24, 2006, at 7:21 AM, Robert Holmes wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I really enjoyed Joe's post and it set me thinking - exactly what
> > has complexity science achieved? IMHO, one measure of a field's
> > health is that the field moves forward (radical, huh?). If I look
> > at particle physics, they now know stuff that they didn't 15 years
> > ago (neutrino mass for example); if I look at high-temperature
> > superconductivity, Tc moves ever upwards. If I look at string
> > theory they ask (and occassionally answer) ever more abstruse and
> > unlikely questions that might not bear any relation to the real
> > world but are at least based on what was asked before.
> >
> > So here's the question: in the field of complexity science, exactly
> > what can we do now that we could not do 15 years ago?
> >
> > Robert
> > ============================================================
> > FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> > Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
> > lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at
http://www.friam.org>
>
> ============================================================
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
> lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at
http://www.friam.org>
URL: /pipermail/friam_redfish.com/attachments/20060724/9cfd38fd/attachment-0001.html