Posted by
Nick Thompson on
URL: http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/In-the-theater-of-consciousness-tp3875347p3881907.html
Hmmm. My assertion would be that if you articuilated what you MEAN by the
knowledge relation it would enevitably require those three elements.
But I can see it might be a hard sell.
Nick
Nicholas S. Thompson
Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Ethology,
Clark University (
[hidden email])
http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/> [Original Message]
> From: David West <
[hidden email]>
> To: nick thompson <
[hidden email]>
> Date: 10/23/2009 4:05:22 PM
> Subject: Re: In the theater of consciousness
>
>
> Nick, just a quick private reply until I get back from Florida and can
> participate in a more helpful manner. But to intrigue/annoy you in the
> meantime - you said
>
> > The argument is as follows: Any knowledge requires a
knowledge-gathering
> > mechanism that uses cues.
>
> As a dedicated mystic I would reject this premise outright - there is no
> mechanism and the cues are the knowledge. Of course, the self in the
> audience of the Cartesian Theatre is merely an illusion.
>
> dave west
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at
http://www.friam.org