Re: ABMs and Psychology
Posted by
Douglas Roberts-2 on
URL: http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/Re-comm-was-Re-FW-Re-Emergence-Seminar-BritishEmergence-tp3654051p3695563.html
Good question!
Let's see what my random philosophy generator has to say about this:
It is plain that we have not simply lost
an infinite horizon of approximations for phenomenology; we retain it,
however, by a freely actualizable return to experiences. Ah, yes: fine stuff.
;-}
--Doug
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 2:28 PM, glen e. p. ropella
<[hidden email]> wrote:
Thus spake Douglas Roberts circa 09-09-22 12:27 PM:
> Nah. Let's go with philosophy. Again.
Hm. Which is worse? Yahoos who have a tendency to wax philosophical or
yahoos who continually, insistently, repeat the same vapid objection to
philosophy over and over and over despite the lack of effect?
What's the definition of "insanity" again? [grin]
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at
http://www.friam.org
--
Doug Roberts
[hidden email][hidden email]505-455-7333 - Office
505-670-8195 - Cell
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at
http://www.friam.org