http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/mystery-and-emergence-tp3599553p3600828.html
I believe you are correct... I think my (mis)quote is a common misquote,
For the T-shirt, I prefer Gehm's Corrolary... if one were to have to
>
>
>
> On Sep 7, 2009, at 8:24 PM, Steve Smith wrote:
>
>> All this talk of emergence and mystery reminds me wonderfully of
>> Clarke's third law:
>>
>> "Any sufficiently advanced science is indistinguishable from magic"
>>
>> and the many wonderful riffs on that including:
>>
>> "Any sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology"
>> - Niven & then Pratchett
>>
>> "Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced."
>> - Gehm's Corollary to Clarke's Law
>>
>> or my mostest favorites:
>>
>> "Any sufficiently analyzed magic is indistinguishable from science!"
>> - Agatha Heterodyne
>>
>> "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a
>> yo-yo,"
>> - Neal Stephenson (in the voice of Enoch Root)
>>
>>
>> So perhaps:
>>
>> "Any sufficiently subtle emergence is indistinguishable from mystery".
>> or
>> "Any sufficiently analyzed emergence is indistinguishable from ..."
>>
>>
>>
>> - Steve
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ============================================================
>> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
>> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
>> lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at
http://www.friam.org>>
>
>
> ============================================================
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
> lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at
http://www.friam.orgMeets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College