Login  Register

Re: emergence

Posted by Merle Lefkoff on Sep 07, 2009; 6:02pm
URL: http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/emergence-tp3586728p3598692.html

But we may have to have a useful conversation about emergence in order
to talk about soul, consciousness, or spirit.

Merle




Nicholas Thompson wrote:

> Try this:  a property of an entity is emergent when it depends on the
> arrangment or the order of presentation of the parts of the entity.  
> (It's /properties/ that are emergent, not /entities/ ... some
> properties of a pile of sand are emergent, some aggregate.)  Here, I
> believe, I am channeling Wimsatt.
>  
> The beauty of reading a collection such as Bedau and The Other Guy is
> that you experience the whip-lash of moving from point of view to
> point of view.   Good exercise for the neck.
>  
> By the way, Russ (was it?) was a ...leetle... unfair to Bedau.  I dont
> think Bedau thinks it's a mystery; i think he thinks others have
> thought  it a mystery.  But it's been a few months since I read it.
>  
> Implementation:  Consider the expression, "there is more than one way
> to skin a cat".   Equivalent to: "there are several programs you can
> use to implement a cat skinning."  
>  
> Consciousness:  the big source of confusion in emergence discussions
> is the attempt to attach emergence to such perennial mysteries as
> consciousness. (Actually, I dont think consciousness is a mystery, but
> let that go.)  The strength of a triangle is an emergent property of
> the arrangment of its legs and their attachments.   There are lots of
> ways bang together boards and still have a weak construction, which I
> learned when I put together a grape arbor with no diagonal members.  
> Worked fine until the grapes grew on it.  Emergent properties are
> everywhere in the simplest of constructions.  We dont need to talk
> about soul, or consciouness, or spirit to have a useful conversation
> about emergence.
>  
> Nick
>  
>  
> Nicholas S. Thompson
> Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Ethology,
> Clark University ([hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>)
> http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/ 
> <http://home.earthlink.net/%7Enickthompson/naturaldesigns/>
>  
>  
>  
>  
>
>     ----- Original Message -----
>     *From:* Victoria Hughes <mailto:[hidden email]>
>     *To: *The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
>     <mailto:[hidden email]>
>     *Sent:* 9/6/2009 10:32:59 AM
>     *Subject:* Re: [FRIAM] emergence
>
>     Consciousness / self-awareness?
>     Is this thus acceptable as an emergent phenomenon?
>     If so, how does this permit, or not, the definition of 'the self'
>     as a unique identity?
>
>
>>     Emergence is what happens when components of the "emergent
>>     entity" act in such a way as to bring about the existence and
>>     persistence of that entity.
>>
>>     When "boids" follow their local flying rules, they create
>>     (implement) a flock. It's not mysterious. We know how it works.
>>
>>     That's all emergence is: coordinated or consistent actions among
>>     a number of elements that result in the formation and persistence
>>     of some aggregate entity or phenomenon.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ============================================================
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
> lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org


============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org