Login  Register

Re: Information request/Amazon EC2

Posted by Douglas Roberts-2 on Aug 20, 2009; 5:00pm
URL: http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/Re-Information-request-Amazon-EC2-tp3475158p3480390.html

Interesting article about cloud computing on Slashdot today:

http://tech.slashdot.org/story/09/08/20/0327205/Amazon-MS-Google-Clouds-Flop-In-Stress-Tests?art_pos=7

--Doug


On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Jack K. Horner <[hidden email]> wrote:
At 09:00 AM 8/19/2009, Doug Roberts wrote:

From: Douglas Roberts <[hidden email]>
Precedence: list
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <[hidden email]>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:38:23 -0600
Reply-To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
       <[hidden email]>
Message-ID: <[hidden email]>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016364ed7a89e0c4404716d2582
Subject: [FRIAM] Information request
Message: 1

Hi, all.

I am interested in learning what kind of experiences users of Amazon's EC2 resources have had.  What resources have you used; what has been your experience with availability, ease of use, cost, data transfer, privacy, etc.?

TIA,

--Doug

--
Doug Roberts
<mailto:[hidden email]>[hidden email]
<mailto:[hidden email]>[hidden email]
505-455-7333 - Office
505-670-8195 - Cell

_______________________________________________
Friam mailing list
[hidden email]
http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com



Doug,

I don't have direct experience with EC2.  However, I attended a computational biology conference about two years ago in which Amazon gave a talk on the system.  Here's what I distilled:

       1.  If computation-to-communication ratio of your application is >> 1 (e.g., the SETI power-spectrum analysis problem), EC2's network performance is benign.  If, in order to realize a time-to-solution in your lifetime, your application requires a computation/communication ratio approaching 1 (e.g., an extreme-scale adaptive Eulerian mesh radiation-hydrodynamics code), the EC2 network is your enemy.

       2.  For comparable problem setups, EC2 was less expensive than buying time on IBM's pay-per-use Blue Gene system.

       3.  For comparable problem setups and theoretical peaks, over the lifecycle the EC2 is less expensive per CPU-hour than a cluster of PCs linked by fast Ethernet.

       4.  There was general agreement among the half-dozen or so users of pay-per-use commercial clusters who were present at the talk that EC2 gave the best bang for the buck.


Jack K. Horner
P. O. Box 266
Los Alamos, NM  87544-0266
Voice:   505-455-0381
Fax:     505-455-0382
email:   [hidden email]




============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org




============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org