Login  Register

Re: Analytic philosophy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Posted by Owen Densmore on Jul 15, 2009; 4:20pm
URL: http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/Analytic-philosophy-Wikipedia-the-free-encyclopedia-tp3235494p3264302.html

As the OP, I'd like to remind ourselves that the original question was:
         Why is it that philosophy does not build on prior work
         in the same way mathematics does?

Our wanderings are important, but can we also attempt to answer The  
Question?

Please note I did not say:
- Mathematics is superior to Philosophy.
- Language is bad, symbolics is good.

I think I have the answer, but I'd like yours as well.

     -- Owen


On Jul 9, 2009, at 8:17 PM, Owen Densmore wrote:

> Nick, Glen, Russ, Eric, and many of us who have participated in the  
> recent spate of philosophical conversations .. I'd like to ask a  
> question:
>
>         Why is it that philosophy does not build on prior work
>         in the same way mathematics does?
>
> In trying to answer this, I looked briefly into the philosopher  
> recommended by Timothy Gowers in his VSI to Mathematics.  In Gowers'  
> wrestling with the abstract (or possibly purely pragmatic) approach  
> to mathematics, he was profoundly affected by Wittgenstein.  I'm  
> enjoying the VSI to Wittgenstein, and am impressed by his analytic  
> approach.
>
> Frank, in the past, has mentioned that modern philosophy might be  
> becoming more formal, turning to a more mathematical approach  
> (apparently flourishing at CMU). Some call it Analytic Philosophy,  
> which includes Wittgenstein.
>  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Analytic_philosophy
>
> So the question to the philosophic amongst us: what is the answer to  
> the above question?  Is there a way in which philosophy can build on  
> past work in the same way mathematics does?  Is there an epsilon/
> delta breakthrough just waiting to happen in that domain?  Will  
> there be a "Modern Algebra" unification within philosophy, finding  
> the common ground amongst widely different concepts like symmetry  
> groups, fields, rings, Hilbert spaces and the like?
>
>    -- Owen


============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org