Re: Direct conversation

Posted by Steve Smith on
URL: http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/Re-Direct-conversation-tp3137870p3140370.html

Russ Abbott wrote:

> Glen,
>
> That seems so defeatist. When one can't be clear, there may not be
> anything one can do about it at the time. But it seems to me that the
> positive arc of science, technology, philosophy, politics, culture,
> etc. (and I think it has been overall a positive arc) has been driven
> by the imperative to be as clear as possible as much as possible.
> Feynman famously said "Science is what we have learned about how not
> to fool ourselves about the way the world is. " Are you really
> objecting to that as a goal?  (It certainly won't work as a software
> development strategy!) I would have thought that this list especially
> would value clarity.
I used to reject Freeman Dyson's aphorism "It is better to be wrong than
vague" out of hand.  I now accept it conditionally.  I accept this
statement as a value judgement about "clarity" rather than one about
quantifying accuracy and uncertainty.

I specialize (personally and professionally) in trying to understand new
concepts outside of familiar paradigms.   This sometimes requires
embracing ambiguity or even ignorance.   I believe that many scientific
breakthroughs (leading to paradigm shifts) involved a great deal of
(temporary) lack of clarity.  I doubt that many understood Relativity
(general or special) or Quantum Theory on their first listen/read.... to
them the extant explanations were anything but clear...   but to quote
Einstien... the were  perhaps "as simple as possible but no simpler".

"Is it a wave or is it a particle?" seems like a pretty clear question
with (one of two) pretty clear answer(s).  But if you understand quantum
theory, you appreciate why this is not such a simple question.

All that said, I think most people here in most discussions are seeking
clarity.    I myself sometimes might be deliberately *expanding* the
ambiguity of a discussion or point with the goal of avoiding various
(potential) local minima in understanding.   I'm not as likely to be
exercising my zen-master impression with Koans, but I suspect a few here
of being good enough to do that.

- Steve



============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org