Posted by
Nick Thompson on
URL: http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/quick-question-tp3037681p3065470.html
Oh dear. I have to read bedau again.
Gawd what a muddle.
Back to you in a few days.
Nick
Nicholas S. Thompson
Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Ethology,
Clark University (
[hidden email])
http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/> [Original Message]
> From: russell standish <
[hidden email]>
> To: <
[hidden email]>; The Friday Morning Applied Complexity
Coffee Group <
[hidden email]>
> Date: 6/12/2009 3:17:44 PM
> Subject: Re: [FRIAM] quick question
>
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 07:01:38PM -0600, Nicholas Thompson wrote:
> > Steve,
> >
> > My understanding of the meaning of "strong" emergence is "inexplicable
> > emergence".
> >
> > Is there another meaning?
> >
> > N
>
> Bedau defines it as emergence with downward causation. For example, we
would say
> that consciousness is strongly emergent if we felt that we could
> consciously influence the activities of our neurons, rather than
> simply our consciousness simply being the result of neuronal activity.
>
> I'm not sure this notion has any use in discussions other than
> consciousness, and even there the notion of epiphenomenalism would say
> that it is void concept.
>
> Cheers
>
> --
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Prof Russell Standish Phone 0425 253119 (mobile)
> Mathematics
> UNSW SYDNEY 2052
[hidden email]
> Australia
http://www.hpcoders.com.au>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at
http://www.friam.org