We have both a FriamGroup meeting in the morning and Gus Koehler speaking in the
afternoon. If you can only go to one, please attend Gus's talk! A powerpoint preview (2.3 Mb) is at: http://www.friam.org/Koehler_20050422.ppt TITLE: Chronocomplexity SPEAKER: Gus Koehler AFFILIATION: Time Structures (http://www.timestructures.com) TIME: Friday April 22, 2:00p (yes, tea and snacks will be available) LOCATION: 624 Agua Fria Conference Room ABSTRACT: Virtually all political and economic actors talk continually in time-related terms. Tactics, long-term strategy, and happenstance merge as time and timing become the common denominators of policy making and economic strategy. Is there more than one temporality that needs to be taken into consideration in such circumstances? Is temporality the same across all temporal levels and scales and across an ecology, including its layers? But this begs fundamental questions such as: Is the direction of causality always from the present into the future for all temporalities? Or, do stochastic events have the same temporal characteristics as events that are not uniformly temporally distributed? Is the behavior space created by a thousand computer agents moving in computer time with only about ten different behaviors enough to demonstrate the temporal complexity of a living population? Perhaps it would more interesting to focus on the collective spatial-time flows of changing events as they continuously structurate the agent and its environment according to some sort of morphodynamics rules. In this approach there would be no entity; only process. The theologian and philosopher, St. Augustine nicely summarized our dilemma. "What is time? If no one asks me, I know but if I wanted to explain it to the one who asks me, I plainly do not know." I will present my recent research that proposes a way to answer these questions drawing on concepts from biology (time-ecology, heterochrony), physics (back-ground independent time) and dimensions, cognitive psychology, complex systems, and the extensive scholarly literature on time. My goal is to propos a problem that is so juicy that some of you might be interest in creating a new approach to autonomous agent simulation. This work received initial funding from NSF, has received a favorable review from the Advanced Technology Program, and is published in various academic journals. |
are we meeting at st john's
----- Original Message ----- From: "Stephen Guerin" <[hidden email]> To: "Friam" <[hidden email]> Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2005 10:29 AM Subject: [FRIAM] reminder: Gus Koehler talk tomorrow 4/22 > We have both a FriamGroup meeting in the morning and Gus Koehler speaking in the > afternoon. > > If you can only go to one, please attend Gus's talk! > > A powerpoint preview (2.3 Mb) is at: > http://www.friam.org/Koehler_20050422.ppt > > TITLE: Chronocomplexity > SPEAKER: Gus Koehler > AFFILIATION: Time Structures (http://www.timestructures.com) > TIME: Friday April 22, 2:00p (yes, tea and snacks will be available) > LOCATION: 624 Agua Fria Conference Room > > ABSTRACT: > Virtually all political and economic actors talk continually in > time-related terms. Tactics, long-term strategy, and happenstance merge > as time and timing become the common denominators of policy making and > economic strategy. Is there more than one temporality that needs to be > taken into consideration in such circumstances? Is temporality the same > across all temporal levels and scales and across an ecology, including > its layers? But this begs fundamental questions such as: Is the > direction of causality always from the present into the future for all > temporalities? Or, do stochastic events have the same temporal > characteristics as events that are not uniformly temporally distributed? > > Is the behavior space created by a thousand computer agents moving in > computer time with only about ten different behaviors enough to > demonstrate the temporal complexity of a living population? Perhaps it > would more interesting to focus on the collective spatial-time flows of > changing events as they continuously structurate the agent and its > environment according to some sort of morphodynamics rules. In this > approach there would be no entity; only process. The theologian and > philosopher, St. Augustine nicely summarized our dilemma. "What is time? > If no one asks me, I know but if I wanted to explain it to the one who > asks me, I plainly do not know." > > I will present my recent research that proposes a way to answer these > questions drawing on concepts from biology (time-ecology, heterochrony), > physics (back-ground independent time) and dimensions, cognitive > psychology, complex systems, and the extensive scholarly literature on > time. My goal is to propos a problem that is so juicy that some of you > might be interest in creating a new approach to autonomous agent > simulation. This work received initial funding from NSF, has received a > favorable review from the Advanced Technology Program, and is published > in various academic journals. > > > ============================================================ > FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv > Meets Fridays 9:30a-11:30 at ad hoc locations > Lecture schedule, archives, unsubscribe, etc.: > http://www.friam.org |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |