reminder: Gus Koehler talk tomorrow 4/22

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

reminder: Gus Koehler talk tomorrow 4/22

Stephen Guerin
We have both a FriamGroup meeting in the morning and Gus Koehler speaking in the
afternoon.

If you can only go to one, please attend Gus's talk!

A powerpoint preview (2.3 Mb) is at:
http://www.friam.org/Koehler_20050422.ppt

TITLE: Chronocomplexity
SPEAKER: Gus Koehler
AFFILIATION: Time Structures (http://www.timestructures.com)
TIME: Friday April 22, 2:00p (yes, tea and snacks will be available)
LOCATION: 624 Agua Fria Conference Room

ABSTRACT:
Virtually all political and economic actors talk continually in
time-related terms.  Tactics, long-term strategy, and happenstance merge
as time and timing become the common denominators of policy making and
economic strategy. Is there more than one temporality that needs to be
taken into consideration in such circumstances?  Is temporality the same
across all temporal levels and scales and across an ecology, including
its layers? But this begs  fundamental questions such as: Is the
direction of causality always from the present into the future for all
temporalities? Or, do stochastic events have the same temporal
characteristics as events that are not uniformly temporally distributed?

Is the behavior space created by a thousand computer agents moving in
computer time with only about ten different behaviors enough to
demonstrate the temporal complexity of a living population? Perhaps it
would more interesting to focus on the collective spatial-time flows of
changing events as they continuously structurate the agent and its
environment according to some sort of morphodynamics rules.  In this
approach there would be no entity; only process.  The theologian and
philosopher, St. Augustine nicely summarized our dilemma. "What is time?
If no one asks me, I know but if I wanted to explain it to the one who
asks me, I plainly do not know."

I will present my recent research that proposes a way to answer these
questions drawing on concepts from biology (time-ecology, heterochrony),
physics (back-ground independent time) and dimensions, cognitive
psychology, complex systems, and the extensive scholarly literature on
time.  My goal is to propos a problem that is so juicy that some of you
might be interest in creating a new approach to autonomous agent
simulation. This work received initial funding from NSF, has received a
favorable review from the Advanced Technology Program, and is published
in various academic journals.


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

reminder: Gus Koehler talk tomorrow 4/22

Michele Huff
are we meeting at st john's
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stephen Guerin" <[hidden email]>
To: "Friam" <[hidden email]>
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2005 10:29 AM
Subject: [FRIAM] reminder: Gus Koehler talk tomorrow 4/22


> We have both a FriamGroup meeting in the morning and Gus Koehler speaking in
the

> afternoon.
>
> If you can only go to one, please attend Gus's talk!
>
> A powerpoint preview (2.3 Mb) is at:
> http://www.friam.org/Koehler_20050422.ppt
>
> TITLE: Chronocomplexity
> SPEAKER: Gus Koehler
> AFFILIATION: Time Structures (http://www.timestructures.com)
> TIME: Friday April 22, 2:00p (yes, tea and snacks will be available)
> LOCATION: 624 Agua Fria Conference Room
>
> ABSTRACT:
> Virtually all political and economic actors talk continually in
> time-related terms.  Tactics, long-term strategy, and happenstance merge
> as time and timing become the common denominators of policy making and
> economic strategy. Is there more than one temporality that needs to be
> taken into consideration in such circumstances?  Is temporality the same
> across all temporal levels and scales and across an ecology, including
> its layers? But this begs  fundamental questions such as: Is the
> direction of causality always from the present into the future for all
> temporalities? Or, do stochastic events have the same temporal
> characteristics as events that are not uniformly temporally distributed?
>
> Is the behavior space created by a thousand computer agents moving in
> computer time with only about ten different behaviors enough to
> demonstrate the temporal complexity of a living population? Perhaps it
> would more interesting to focus on the collective spatial-time flows of
> changing events as they continuously structurate the agent and its
> environment according to some sort of morphodynamics rules.  In this
> approach there would be no entity; only process.  The theologian and
> philosopher, St. Augustine nicely summarized our dilemma. "What is time?
> If no one asks me, I know but if I wanted to explain it to the one who
> asks me, I plainly do not know."
>
> I will present my recent research that proposes a way to answer these
> questions drawing on concepts from biology (time-ecology, heterochrony),
> physics (back-ground independent time) and dimensions, cognitive
> psychology, complex systems, and the extensive scholarly literature on
> time.  My goal is to propos a problem that is so juicy that some of you
> might be interest in creating a new approach to autonomous agent
> simulation. This work received initial funding from NSF, has received a
> favorable review from the Advanced Technology Program, and is published
> in various academic journals.
>
>
> ============================================================
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Meets Fridays 9:30a-11:30 at ad hoc locations
> Lecture schedule, archives, unsubscribe, etc.:
> http://www.friam.org