Very interesting work.
Sam Bowles had a nice 2001 SFI public lecture "In Search of "Homo
economicus:" Experiments on Five Continents" that reviewed anthropology
studies of Ultimatum. Here's a related paper.
<
http://www.santafe.edu/sfi/publications/Working-Papers/01-11-063.pdf>
Also, here's a link to a google search for Ultimatum confined to
site:santafe.edu
<
http://www.google.com/search?q=ultimatum+site:santafe.edu&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&start=20&sa=N>
____________________________________________________
http://www.redfish.com [hidden email]
624 Agua Fria Street office: (505)995-0206
Santa Fe, NM 87501 mobile: (505)577-5828
> -----Original Message-----
> From:
[hidden email] [mailto:
[hidden email]]On Behalf
> Of Roger E Critchlow Jr
> Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 9:10 AM
> To:
[hidden email]
> Subject: [FRIAM] neuro-economics
>
>
> Here's a NYTimes article about a study that appeared in Science
> last Friday:
>
>
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/06/17/science/17NEUR.html>
> They're watching brain region activity scans while people are playing
> the ultimatum game, in which one player proposes a division of the
> spoils which the other player can accept or reject. If the ultimatum is
> accepted, then each player gets the proposed split, but if the ultimatum
> is rejected, then each player gets nothing. In either case the game is
> over after one round. What they see that the game is played rationally
> as long as the ultimatum is fair. But when the ultimatum becomes
> greedy, rational economic behavior is abandoned in favor of
> scorched earth.
>
> -- rec --
>
>
> =========================================================
> FRIAM Complexity Coffee listserv
> Meets Fridays 9AM @ Jane's Cafe
> Archives, unsubscribe, etc.:
>
http://www.redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com>
>