Thanks, David,
No. I mean the text. I guess the only way is to block copy into Word and
go from there.
It's a small thing.
Earthlink has a neat web page for idiots tool that could be used
collaboratively.... Sort of PBWIKI on speed, with fonts and frames and
colors and styles etc. Called Trellix.
The styles suck ... they all seem like designs for a funeral parlor. But
one can do quite a lot outside them.
But of course that does not help in a situation in which you see a friend
struggling with a site (or see your former department doing violence to the
english language on their site) and want help (or whatever it is that old
people do when they offer unsollicited advice.
Best,
Nick
> [Original Message]
> From: Prof David West <profwest at fastmail.fm>
> To: <nickthompson at earthlink.net>; The Friday Morning Applied
ComplexityCoffee Group <friam at redfish.com>
> Date: 10/15/2007 3:02:09 PM
> Subject: Re: [FRIAM] critique-ing a web page
>
>
> Depends on what you mean by critique. Technical accuracy of HTML, XML,
> etc. yes. Aesthetics, value to world, idiocy of blinking text, no. You
> would have to go to a wiki technology for the latter, or hope that the
> site designers included a feedback option. Most Web pages are not meant
> to be collaborative.
>
>
> davew
>
> On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:08:33 -0600, "Nicholas Thompson"
> <nickthompson at earthlink.net> said:
> > All or any,
> >
> > Is there any software ... analgous, say, to the reviewing taskbar in
Word
> > ... that allows one to critique a web page?
> >
> >
> > Nick
> >
> > Nicholas S. Thompson
> > Research Associate, Redfish Group, Santa Fe, NM (nick at redfish.com)
> > Professor of Psychology and Ethology, Clark University
> > (nthompson at clarku.edu)
Locked
