Wolfram's 2,3 Turing Machine Not Universal

[Douglas Roberts-2]

Looks like there is a controversy brewing:

http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/10/29/2212226

--Doug
--
Doug Roberts, RTI International
droberts at rti.org
doug at parrot-farm.net
505-455-7333 - Office
505-670-8195 - Cell
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/attachments/20071030/1f35b6f0/attachment.html 

[Douglas Roberts-2]

I forgot to point out this comment.  I love SlashDot.

*Wolfram's 2,3 Turing Machine Not Universal*
HOLLYWOOD - In a shock move, MGM has undercut Universal in its bid for the
movie rights to *Wolfram's 2,3 Turing Machine*. Insiders had predicted that
Universal would make the deal to build on the phenomenal success of *Wolfram's
2,2 Turing Machine*, but it has since become apparent that Universal failed
to include an option for all sequels in the original contract. The exact
figure offered by MGM is unknown, but is believed to be approximately x + y,
and we can confirm that y is a finite number. More details will follow.

On 10/30/07, Douglas Roberts <doug at parrot-farm.net> wrote:

>
> Looks like there is a controversy brewing:
>
> http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/10/29/2212226
>
> --Doug
> --
> Doug Roberts, RTI International
> droberts at rti.org
> doug at parrot-farm.net
> 505-455-7333 - Office
> 505-670-8195 - Cell

--
Doug Roberts, RTI International
droberts at rti.org
doug at parrot-farm.net
505-455-7333 - Office
505-670-8195 - Cell
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/attachments/20071030/c85e69f4/attachment.html