There have been some occasions recently when a particular technology or
solution we have been looking at was referred to as "Web 2.0". Some preliminary research on what is "Web 2.0" has only confused me some more. So (with Steve Guerin's blessing) I decided it would be useful to poll the FRIAM group with a few questions in an attempt to clarify the meaning of the term. I hope to include a summary of the various thoughts and opinions in an upcoming newsletter I put out. I'll post a copy here too. So, there are only a few ground rules: * I won't mention names of contributors in anything I publish. * In responding, you are letting me quote you (anonymously) and letting me use the compiled responses, without copyright infringement. * Please try not to bury me with long epistles, material that is excessively technical or laced with large doses of jargon. * Please send your contributions directly to me at robert at cirrillian.com by September 15, 2008. The newsletter (http://www.cirrillian.com/newsletters.html) is free and comes out about 4 times a year. So here are a few questions to get the gray matter going: * What was Web 1.0? * What is Web 2.0: a technology, a style of usage, a type of application, none of the above, all of the above? * What will follow? * Is there anything worth mentioning in between? * What can your share about your profession? Thanks for your contributions! Robert Cordingley www.cirrillian.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/attachments/20070906/4efc74a5/attachment.html |
Robert Cordingley wrote:
> * What was Web 1.0? HTML, with or without all the dynamic content capabilities, served by a web-server to a browser, primarily in a one-way information flow. Yes, Web 1.0 included information flow from browser to web-site (eCommerce, webmail, and webforums) but the duplex flow didn't have the purpose of explicitly connecting the browser users or taking advantage of multiple users at the same time. The relationships were, essentially, many to one. > * What is Web 2.0: a technology, a style of usage, a type of > application, none of the above, all of the above? Web 1.0 that takes advantage of the distributed user base and duplex communication to achieve emergent capability not possible through the standard, simplex, server-browser model. This implies some use of active content and possibly applications served through the browser (usually executed on the client's computer). Web 2.0 is web-server moderated many to many relationships. > * What will follow? Web 3.0? Seriously, the next step will be a peer-to-peer web. This will converge chat/IM, peer-to-peer file transfers, and web-server/browser capabilities. This will require new protocol specifications and software that combine the various components. None of the existing mechanisms will provide all the capability. Essentially, the browser will morph into a combined browser/server with peer-to-peer capability and standard plug-ins (or APIs) that integrate other applications such as chat/IM/VOIP. One will browse the web, still, but what one sees, hears, types and speaks will travel via other users and will not be moderated by servers. Security and privacy will be interesting. > * Is there anything worth mentioning in between? Web 2.1 through 2.9 - basically variants on existing protocols and standards that mash up the individual components of Web 3.0 until a fully capable protocol/standard emerges. Some of the in-between already exists in the form of apps like Google: Earth/Sky - web but not web. > * What can your share about your profession? I'm not a cracker, but I play one on TV? I perform authorized, adversary-based, system security assessments for defensive purposes. -- Ray Parks rcparks at sandia.gov Consilient Heuristician Voice:505-844-4024 ATA Department Mobile:505-238-9359 http://www.sandia.gov/scada Fax:505-844-9641 http://www.sandia.gov/idart Pager:800-690-5288 http://www.sandia.gov/redteam2007 |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |