What evolves?

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
22 messages Options
12
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: What evolves?

Nick Thompson
Carl Tollander wrote:

 
That is very nearly a tautology.

NST replies:

You mean:

All thoughts are morbid
This is a thought
This thought is morbid?


============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: What evolves?

Sarbajit Roy (testing)
In reply to this post by Prof David West
Dear Dave

I'm not entirely sure that Vedic philosophy extends to ruling out a distinction between living and non-living. For example there is an ancient Vedic verse which states that all life exists to be consumed. Presumably meaning that the end result of the food chain is that we are all dead (non-living). The Buddhist schools, however, would concentrate on Karmic reincarnations through the device of the "immortal soul" etc.

Sarbajit

On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 1:53 AM, Prof David West <[hidden email]> wrote:
Nick - I am too much a Vedic/Buddhist to take seriously the idea that
there distinction between "living" and "non-living."  But not to despair
- the end result is all living.

davew


============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
12