Login  Register

What evolves?

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
22 messages Options Options
Embed post
Permalink
12
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
| More
Print post
Permalink

Re: What evolves?

Nick Thompson
2732 posts
Carl Tollander wrote:

 
That is very nearly a tautology.

NST replies:

You mean:

All thoughts are morbid
This is a thought
This thought is morbid?


============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
| More
Print post
Permalink

Re: What evolves?

Sarbajit Roy (testing)
199 posts
In reply to this post by Prof David West
Dear Dave

I'm not entirely sure that Vedic philosophy extends to ruling out a distinction between living and non-living. For example there is an ancient Vedic verse which states that all life exists to be consumed. Presumably meaning that the end result of the food chain is that we are all dead (non-living). The Buddhist schools, however, would concentrate on Karmic reincarnations through the device of the "immortal soul" etc.

Sarbajit

On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 1:53 AM, Prof David West <[hidden email]> wrote:
Nick - I am too much a Vedic/Buddhist to take seriously the idea that
there distinction between "living" and "non-living."  But not to despair
- the end result is all living.

davew


============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
12