TITLE: Fearful Asymmetry: Terror, Power, and the Shape of Popular Action
SPEAKER: Jonathan Barker AFFILIATION: Professor Emeritus of Political Science, University of Toronto LOCATION: 624 Agua Fria Conference Room ABSTRACT: The deeper argument for participation holds that through participation in the decisions that affect their lives, people exercise and develop the best of themselves as full human and social beings. Participation takes further meaning from its potential for pushing social reforms that reduce injustices within and between societies. Today these positive qualities of participation are challenged by core features of globalization. Participation requires spaces in which equality of voices is recognized and protected, yet globally and in most economies and large-scale organizations inequality of social and economic power is on the rise. The most complete forms of participation take place in settings that make decisions for whole communities and encompass all the features of social life, yet power tends to become more fragmented and dispersed with the deliberative bodies losing power in relation to military machines, corporations, and administrative bureaucracies. New technologies of violence threaten participation from the mighty via bombs and security police, and from the margins via terrorist acts. New information technologies strengthen the strong, but also give new capacities to the weak. The fear inspired by terrorist acts and the so-called war on terrorism has skewed the field of action sharply in favor of the holders of economic and military power. Those who work for the deeper benefits of expanded participation in particular activities are well-placed to assess this new fearful asymmetry and to act against it. Many of the most committed and creative participatory initiatives are local, but their success is not assured by only local strengths. Local participation works best when it is linked to wider networks of technical and political knowledge, when it gains some support from higher political and administrative officials, and where basic political rights are protected by laws and customs. Spreading the benefits of participation under today?s conditions will require new kinds of settings joined in new kinds of networks. BIO Jonathan Barker?s teaching, writing, and research have focused on issues of participation and political change in the developing world. His research on rural policy and politics in Senegal, Tanzania, and Uganda shows how political action is related to a crisis of livelihood and complex survival strategies (Rural Communities under Stress: Peasant Farmers and the State in Africa, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989). He developed a conception of political settings that can be used in field research on grass roots political action. The ideas are explained and put to use in a series of case studies in India, Pakistan, Nigeria, Uganda, Nicaragua, the United States, and England he carried out in collaboration with graduate researchers. That work showed how people with little power and few resources often can create and use political space to defend their livelihoods and to assert their identities (Street-Level Democracy: Political Settings at the Margins of Global Power, Toronto: Between the Lines, 1999 and West Hartford, Connecticut: Kumarian Press, 1999.) Most recently he has tried to understand the ways popular political action is affected by terrorist acts and the war on terrorism (No-Nonsense Guide to Terrorism, Toronto, Between the Lines and the New Internationalist, 2003 and London: Verso, 2003). Jonathan Barker is Professor Emeritus of Political Science at the University of Toronto. His email is [hidden email] |
Oops, I forgot to include the time for Jonathan's lecture...Wed June 8
12:30p-1:30 -Steve TITLE: Fearful Asymmetry: Terror, Power, and the Shape of Popular Action SPEAKER: Jonathan Barker AFFILIATION: Professor Emeritus of Political Science, University of Toronto TIME: Wed June 8 12:30p-1:30 LOCATION: 624 Agua Fria Conference Room ABSTRACT: The deeper argument for participation holds that through participation in the decisions that affect their lives, people exercise and develop the best of themselves as full human and social beings. Participation takes further meaning from its potential for pushing social reforms that reduce injustices within and between societies. Today these positive qualities of participation are challenged by core features of globalization. Participation requires spaces in which equality of voices is recognized and protected, yet globally and in most economies and large-scale organizations inequality of social and economic power is on the rise. The most complete forms of participation take place in settings that make decisions for whole communities and encompass all the features of social life, yet power tends to become more fragmented and dispersed with the deliberative bodies losing power in relation to military machines, corporations, and administrative bureaucracies. New technologies of violence threaten participation from the mighty via bombs and security police, and from the margins via terrorist acts. New information technologies strengthen the strong, but also give new capacities to the weak. The fear inspired by terrorist acts and the so-called war on terrorism has skewed the field of action sharply in favor of the holders of economic and military power. Those who work for the deeper benefits of expanded participation in particular activities are well-placed to assess this new fearful asymmetry and to act against it. Many of the most committed and creative participatory initiatives are local, but their success is not assured by only local strengths. Local participation works best when it is linked to wider networks of technical and political knowledge, when it gains some support from higher political and administrative officials, and where basic political rights are protected by laws and customs. Spreading the benefits of participation under today?s conditions will require new kinds of settings joined in new kinds of networks. BIO Jonathan Barker?s teaching, writing, and research have focused on issues of participation and political change in the developing world. His research on rural policy and politics in Senegal, Tanzania, and Uganda shows how political action is related to a crisis of livelihood and complex survival strategies (Rural Communities under Stress: Peasant Farmers and the State in Africa, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989). He developed a conception of political settings that can be used in field research on grass roots political action. The ideas are explained and put to use in a series of case studies in India, Pakistan, Nigeria, Uganda, Nicaragua, the United States, and England he carried out in collaboration with graduate researchers. That work showed how people with little power and few resources often can create and use political space to defend their livelihoods and to assert their identities (Street-Level Democracy: Political Settings at the Margins of Global Power, Toronto: Between the Lines, 1999 and West Hartford, Connecticut: Kumarian Press, 1999.) Most recently he has tried to understand the ways popular political action is affected by terrorist acts and the war on terrorism (No-Nonsense Guide to Terrorism, Toronto, Between the Lines and the New Internationalist, 2003 and London: Verso, 2003). Jonathan Barker is Professor Emeritus of Political Science at the University of Toronto. His email is [hidden email] |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |