Visualizing Complexity

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Visualizing Complexity

Owen Densmore
Administrator
Not our kind of complexity, but interesting.
        http://weblogs.java.net/pub/wlg/652
Gosling sez that it would be better if a program could
use the expressions natural to a given expertise.  So
for example, a mathematician should be able to simply
write an equation in the program, similarly for other
fields.

Owen Densmore           451 Camino Don Miguel     Santa Fe, NM 87505
Italy: 339-477-2892     Cell: 505-570-0168        Home: 505-988-3787
[hidden email] http://complexityworkshop.com http://backspaces.net


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Visualizing Complexity

Roger Frye
> Not our kind of complexity, but interesting.
>     http://weblogs.java.net/pub/wlg/652
> Gosling sez that it would be better if a program could
> use the expressions natural to a given expertise.  So
> for example, a mathematician should be able to simply
> write an equation in the program, similarly for other
> fields.
>
> Owen Densmore


A friend told me that in Traub's recent SFI lecture on continuous
quantum algorithms, he suggested that Turing machines should be extended
to include real numbers so that they could more easily describe
algorithms on the continuum.  Strange idea since all of our actual
computers (lacking a dense set of infinite tapes) make do with finite
approximations.
-Roger