Or.. (Even if a little 'zooey') couldn't it be a direct continuation of the earlier discussion of life being an 'ill-posed' question for information analysis?
Phil.
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
-----Original Message-----
From: Carl Tollander <
[hidden email]>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 22:47:56
To:The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <friam at redfish.com>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Very wierd science NYT
Paul writes:
> FYI from a freak and somewhat confused observer
> _http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/15/science/15brain.html?th&emc=th_ <
http://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/2008-January/_http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/15/science/15brain.html?th&emc=th_>
> (
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/15/science/15brain.html?th&emc=th <
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/15/science/15brain.html?th&emc=th>)
>
> Paul
>
>
>
You may feel somewhat better after drilling through this (see topic of
the day):
http://backreaction.blogspot.com/2008/01/this-and-that_15.htmlCarl
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at
http://www.friam.org
Locked
