washingtonpost.com: Verizon Wireless Lets You Get Online and Get Out --
Quickly washingtonpost.com Verizon Wireless Lets You Get Online and Get Out -- Quickly By Rob Pegoraro Sunday, March 14, 2004; Page F07 For too many people around the Washington area, getting broadband access in their homes is somewhere between difficult, expensive and impossible. Last week, though, I had broadband anywhere I took a laptop -- in my living room, at my desk, in a deli and on a speeding Metro train. Verizon Wireless's BroadbandAccess is the first wireless data service I've tried that could actually be mistaken for a cable or digital-subscriber-line connection. It routinely got me on the Internet in seconds, downloaded 600,000 bits of data each second and stayed online for as long as I wanted. But at $79.99 a month, it's only a good deal to those who can write it off as a business expense. In its favor, BroadbandAccess (Verizon's name for a technology called EvDO, short for Evolution Data Only) combines the speed of broadband, the weightless ease of WiFi and the coverage of cellular service. Have laptop, will surf -- provided you don't stray from the District and its suburbs or the San Diego area, the only two markets in the United States where Verizon offers this service. In its disfavor, BroadbandAccess costs about twice as much as what most people pay for either their cell phone or their broadband connection but can't readily replace either: Its Windows-only PC Card modem won't work in desktop PCs without some tweaking, and it includes neither an e-mail account nor voice phone service. What's clear is this: After years of false promises of fast wireless Internet access in our time, somebody has finally delivered it. BroadbandAccess is shockingly simple to use. Run a quick installer program (Win 98 SE or newer required), pop Verizon's PC Card into the laptop's slot, and click the "connect" button on the screen. Almost every time, I was online within five seconds of that click. That's not always-on access, but it's immensely better than dial-up and even many WiFi connections. Verizon says BroadbandAccess's downloads should average 3oo to 500 kilobits per second (kbps) and can hit 2 million bits per second (Mbps) at best. Although I never saw peak speeds that high, my everyday results comfortably exceeded those average estimates. First I ran a lengthy series of speed tests at a widely used benchmarking site (wdc.speakeasy.net). The worst performance I saw was a 540 kbps download and a 63 kbps upload, achieved at half signal strength. Most of the time, I clocked about 650 kbps down and 140 kbps up. Then I tested the reliability of the connection by tuning into a Web radio station's 128-kbps music stream; over about four hours, I heard two or three dropouts. Streaming video wasn't a problem either; a set of large RealVideo "Daily Show with Jon Stewart" interviews and Windows Media movie trailers played back stutter-free. Files downloaded as fast as they would over my DSL connection. I even logged in to The Washington Post's network and edited a few stories, easily the most bandwidth-sensitive task I do at home. I also took the laptop for a ride aboveground on Metro, to see if I'd lose the connection while moving from one antenna to another at high speeds. Aside from one fade-out around the Dunn-Loring station, BroadbandAccess worked the same at 60 mph as it did standing still. On the way back, I expected to get kicked offline as the train went underground, but the connection was silently handed off from the BroadbandAccess signal to the slower, older 1xRTT (1x radio transmission technology) service in the subway. All that should be great news to anybody who needs Internet access throughout the day for their job -- the consultants, salespeople, real estate agents and other "mobile professionals" to whom Verizon Wireless is pitching this service. But couldn't this technology also provide broadband to consumers as well as tech workers? EvDO should be cheaper to deploy than cable or DSL: Verizon says expanding its coverage beyond the Washington and San Diego beachheads, as planned for later this year, won't involve much more work than its routine system upgrades. Could Verizon offer a consumer-oriented version of this for closer to $40 a month? "Sure," said analyst Jane Zweig, chief executive of the Shosteck Group, a Wheaton-based research firm. There's only one problem: "Right now, they don't have to." Verizon has no competition at this speed and won't for a while. Carriers using the competing GSM (Global System for Mobile communications) wireless standard aren't close; for instance, AT&T's new EDGE (Enhanced Data Rates for Global Evolution) service tops out at 200 kbps. Nextel is trying out a different wireless-data technology in North Carolina that offers 1.5 to 3 Mbps downloads and 375 to 750 kbps uploads. But it hasn't said anything about when this trial might lead to a commercial service, or what it might cost. Sprint PCS does use the same wireless standard as Verizon, but it plans to skip EvDO in favor of a faster successor to it, EvDV (Evolution Data-Voice) that's probably two years off. In the meantime, Verizon Wireless can still make plenty of money catering to tech businesses. Would it want to risk undercutting its corporate parent's DSL business anyway? And yet: One of the major wireless carriers in Japan, KDDI Corp., charges less than $40 a month for unlimited use of its own EvDO service. If fast wireless Internet access wasn't too much to hope for after all, affordable, fast wireless Internet access shouldn't be impossible either. Living with technology, or trying to? E-mail Rob Pegoraro at [hidden email]. ? 2004 The Washington Post Company -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://constantinople.hostgo.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/attachments/20040315/d6deb64b/attachment.htm |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |