Time perspectives

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
6 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Time perspectives

Jochen Fromm-4
In this wonderfully animated video, Philip Zimbardo
talks about the geography of time, time perspectives,
online gaming and sit-down family diners
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A3oIiH7BLmg

-J.



============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Time perspectives

Eric Charles
Jochen,
It is a wonderful video, but I worry about the content.

Zimbardo's ability to mix a small amount of science with a lot of common-sense vacuous, but appealing, bull shit, never ceases to amaze me. For example, "All addictions are addictions of present hedonism." Really? Have we checked ALL addictions. Do we have a good enough definition of 'addiction' to really test the hypothesis? Is that merely true by definition? If I came up with an alternative example, like say a compulsive collector of past-related items (old baseball cards, records, civil war memorabilia), would you simply keep twisting it until you could justify it in terms of your original statement. I think at least half of the things said could be subjected to similar criticism. For another example, as a kid I played far more than 10,000 hours of video games, I'm not so sure there is a direct relationship between that and school/life failure. Correlation? Maybe, but I'll bet Phil's intro stats classes mentioned something about the relationship between correlation and causation.

And yet I maintain my faith that in subjects other than Psychology Stanford has important people.

Eric



On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 07:01 AM, "Jochen Fromm" <[hidden email]> wrote:
In this wonderfully animated video, Philip Zimbardo 
talks about the geography of time, time perspectives,
online gaming and sit-down family diners
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A3oIiH7BLmg

-J.



============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org


Eric Charles

Professional Student and
Assistant Professor of Psychology
Penn State University
Altoona, PA 16601



============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Time perspectives

Jochen Fromm-4
Eric,

Yes, you are right, the content is a bit controversial, a wild hodgepodge of
unrelated things. It is certainly not an example of good science.. It would
be useful for marketing purposes, though, the animations are nice. And you
must admit that the video contains some thought-provoking issues.

-J.

----- Original Message -----
From: ERIC P. CHARLES
To: Jochen Fromm
Cc: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
Sent: Sunday, June 13, 2010 3:44 PM
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Time perspectives


Jochen,
It is a wonderful video, but I worry about the content.

Zimbardo's ability to mix a small amount of science with a lot of
common-sense vacuous, but appealing, bull shit, never ceases to amaze me.
For example, "All addictions are addictions of present hedonism." Really?
Have we checked ALL addictions. Do we have a good enough definition of
'addiction' to really test the hypothesis? Is that merely true by
definition? If I came up with an alternative example, like say a compulsive
collector of past-related items (old baseball cards, records, civil war
memorabilia), would you simply keep twisting it until you could justify it
in terms of your original statement. I think at least half of the things
said could be subjected to similar criticism. For another example, as a kid
I played far more than 10,000 hours of video games, I'm not so sure there is
a direct relationship between that and school/life failure. Correlation?
Maybe, but I'll bet Phil's intro stats classes mentioned something about the
relationship between correlation and causation.

And yet I maintain my faith that in subjects other than Psychology Stanford
has important people.

Eric



On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 07:01 AM, "Jochen Fromm" <[hidden email]> wrote:

In this wonderfully animated video, Philip Zimbardo talks about the
geography of time, time perspectives, online gaming and sit-down family
dinershttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A3oIiH7BLmg-J.============================================================FRIAM
Applied Complexity Group listservMeets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St.
John's Collegelectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
Eric Charles

Professional Student and
Assistant Professor of Psychology
Penn State University
Altoona, PA 16601


============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Time perspectives

Owen Densmore
Administrator
In reply to this post by Jochen Fromm-4
The RSA animations are quite a find!  Thanks.

I can respond to one part of the video: the Lega Nord:
        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lega_Nord
I first heard of it listening to an Italian audio magazine that comes out every other month.  There have been 3-4 articles over the last 4 years.

It has had a huge impact on fiscal laws.  For example, in recent elections a certain percentage of taxes collected in a region MUST be spent in that region.  This is to halt the flow of money from north to south.

Maybe Fabio and others of our Italian readers could comment.  As a traveler in Italy, I've not spent much time in the south, but going through Napoli to Capri, I did get some of that feel.  I don't get it as much in Rome, but then I was there on business once so got to see some of the non-turist side of Rome.

Relating to the video .. I really buy the fact that this invisible time artifact just might be quite important.  Certainly thought provoking.

How'd you happen across it?

    -- Owen


On Jun 13, 2010, at 5:01 AM, Jochen Fromm wrote:

> In this wonderfully animated video, Philip Zimbardo talks about the geography of time, time perspectives, online gaming and sit-down family diners
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A3oIiH7BLmg
>
> -J.


============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Time perspectives

Nick Thompson
In reply to this post by Jochen Fromm-4
Eric,
 
I agree. The most sucessful psychologists ... the ones that made the big bucks in textbooks, etc, and in circles of admiring chicks at conferences ... are the ones who made an industry of taking conventional wisdom and repackaging it as science. I think there is some point where I join the "hard" scientist critique of the "soft" sciences, not because the latter   not as methodologically rigorous, but more because the questions they ask are so maleable. A social scientist can always arrange to look like a leader by watching where the mob is running and strolling over to be there when it arrives.
 
"See. I was here first. I am your leader."
 
But am I envious? You bet!
 
Nick
 
PS to EPC:  Note the New Realist premise, here. 
 
Nicholas S. Thompson
Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Ethology,
Clark University ([hidden email])
http://www.cusf.org [City University of Santa Fe]
 
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
To: [hidden email]
Sent: 6/13/2010 9:44:38 AM
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Time perspectives

Jochen,
It is a wonderful video, but I worry about the content.

Zimbardo's ability to mix a small amount of science with a lot of common-sense vacuous, but appealing, bull shit, never ceases to amaze me. For example, "All addictions are addictions of present hedonism." Really? Have we checked ALL addictions. Do we have a good enough definition of 'addiction' to really test the hypothesis? Is that merely true by definition? If I came up with an alternative example, like say a compulsive collector of past-related items (old baseball cards, records, civil war memorabilia), would you simply keep twisting it until you could justify it in terms of your original statement. I think at least half of the things said could be subjected to similar criticism. For another example, as a kid I played far more than 10,000 hours of video games, I'm not so sure there is a direct relationship between that and school/life failure. Correlation? Maybe, but I'll bet Phil's intro stats classes mentioned something about the relationship between correlation and causation.

And yet I maintain my faith that in subjects other than Psychology Stanford has important people.

Eric



On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 07:01 AM, "Jochen Fromm" <[hidden email]> wrote:
In this wonderfully animated video, Philip Zimbardo 
talks about the geography of time, time perspectives,
online gaming and sit-down family diners
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A3oIiH7BLmg

-J.



============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org


Eric Charles

Professional Student and
Assistant Professor of Psychology
Penn State University
Altoona, PA 16601



============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Time perspectives

Russ Abbott
Jeremy Rifkin's RSA video (The Empathic Civilization) claims that we are wired for empathy but that empathy exists only because we can identify with others' suffering. According to Rifkin (at about 4 1/2 minutes) there is no empathy in Heaven; there is no empathy in Utopia. I also liked Daniel Pink's RSA presentation on motivation and drive.


-- Russ A



On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 9:02 AM, Nicholas Thompson <[hidden email]> wrote:
Eric,
 
I agree. The most sucessful psychologists ... the ones that made the big bucks in textbooks, etc, and in circles of admiring chicks at conferences ... are the ones who made an industry of taking conventional wisdom and repackaging it as science. I think there is some point where I join the "hard" scientist critique of the "soft" sciences, not because the latter   not as methodologically rigorous, but more because the questions they ask are so maleable. A social scientist can always arrange to look like a leader by watching where the mob is running and strolling over to be there when it arrives.
 
"See. I was here first. I am your leader."
 
But am I envious? You bet!
 
Nick
 
PS to EPC:  Note the New Realist premise, here. 
 
Nicholas S. Thompson
Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Ethology,
Clark University ([hidden email])
http://www.cusf.org [City University of Santa Fe]
 
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: 6/13/2010 9:44:38 AM
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Time perspectives

Jochen,
It is a wonderful video, but I worry about the content.

Zimbardo's ability to mix a small amount of science with a lot of common-sense vacuous, but appealing, bull shit, never ceases to amaze me. For example, "All addictions are addictions of present hedonism." Really? Have we checked ALL addictions. Do we have a good enough definition of 'addiction' to really test the hypothesis? Is that merely true by definition? If I came up with an alternative example, like say a compulsive collector of past-related items (old baseball cards, records, civil war memorabilia), would you simply keep twisting it until you could justify it in terms of your original statement. I think at least half of the things said could be subjected to similar criticism. For another example, as a kid I played far more than 10,000 hours of video games, I'm not so sure there is a direct relationship between that and school/life failure. Correlation? Maybe, but I'll bet Phil's intro stats classes mentioned something about the relationship between correlation and causation.

And yet I maintain my faith that in subjects other than Psychology Stanford has important people.

Eric



On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 07:01 AM, "Jochen Fromm" <[hidden email]> wrote:
In this wonderfully animated video, Philip Zimbardo 
talks about the geography of time, time perspectives,
online gaming and sit-down family diners
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A3oIiH7BLmg

-J.



============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org


Eric Charles

Professional Student and
Assistant Professor of Psychology
Penn State University
Altoona, PA 16601



============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org


============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org